Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140808194933/@comment-14027812-20140809203501

GarouxBloodline wrote: Pelinal Whitestrake wrote: Flugsmith wrote: To make this consensus even remotely fair, you should make 2 separate consensuses, 1 putting forward your argument for his demotion, and his (whether he choses too or not) defense. The next consensus should then ask people whether they feel his demotion is necessary or not, and have people vote on their final decision.

Either way, the fact that you've said he can't comment is biased, and frankly, you can't control the people commenting. "To ensure the integrity of this consensus, Jimeee is not permitted to make any votes but he is permitted to discuss."

He can comment. He said "you've", which is past tense - he did, indeed, say at one point that Jimeee could not even comment.

In which way is that relevant again? I would appreciate it if you could keep the minor details out of this and actualky discuss the demotion.