Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-82.30.53.52-20130707190543/@comment-16473632-20131026163721

24.44.141.89 wrote: Hbxn wrote: 24.44.141.89 wrote: Hbxn wrote:

Dovahsebrom wrote:

Lorkhan is the first "son" of Padomay while Akatosh is the first "son" of Anu. Think of it like this, Lorkhan and Akatosh are two sides of the same coin existing on two different coins that only have one side.

The other Aedra are born from the Aurbis. The mixture of Anu and Padomay. If lorkhan is a son of Padomay, this will also make him a Daedra right....

but how come he have a realm in Aethirius which is called Sovngarde which is the place for the realms of the Aedras, rather than having a realm in Oblivion ? The term "Daedra" is not given to you because you were born from full Padomay blood. It is given to you if you did NOT take part in the creation of the world, which the Aedra did. Also, Shor is just the Nordic variant of Lorkhan. Is Daedric Prince the same as Daedra ? Yes because they did not take part in the creation of the world. Lorkhan is not a Daedra, however. He was born from half Anu and Half Padomay blood but he was the son of Padomay while Akatosh was the son of Anu. And he took part in the creation of the world. So Sheogorath & Malacath who don't take part in the creation of Nirn isn't a Daedra then....