Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25075055-20140203153514/@comment-13446185-20140208192857

Dovah, comparing your article to an article about a significant event on Wikipedia is invalidating your argument and has no relevance to this discussion.

If comparing my page to a wikipedia page is irrelevant, then UAM's comment about "wikipedia's definiton of lead" is also irrelevant.

No, you did not "write a summary of its most important aspects", your lead was essentially a summary of Vivec as a character

You should probably read the page then, so far I've really only written about Vivec as a character; and yes I did summarize his most important aspects, bringing up only relevant info to him such as how he is veiwed and how he disappeared, I put only a very small section on what he actaully did.

'which is what ALL articles are supposed to be like. '

According to you. You forget that I'm arguing my opinion on whether this whole thing is relevant.

'Also, what Flightmare said. My edit is to improve the standard of the article, but you are taking it as a personal insult (essentially). '

No I'm not, I'm saying that what your doing doesn't really improve the quality of the page, atleast how I see it.