Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25356303-20171105225004/@comment-26074798-20171118031234

That seems fair enough for the images, although I'm still not 100% sold for the article maintenance. At the end of the day, cracking open a cold hard infobox with the boys is pretty nice too. All sarcasm aside, I feel like even if the focus isn't on maintenance edits, what about edits that correct the information that's already there? The purpose is to add new content I suppose, but are we going to remove the bytes as a whole and not count it for people who reword articles? Reading entire articles and making sure they're correct can almost be more time consuming than just writing them.

Personally, I do enjoy staring at a perfectly formatted infobox for hours (why do you think my vision is so bad?) there are still other negative byte-sized edits that can happen. Ignoring all of the edits wouldn't be fair.

Also, I'm not particularly sure if it would be a fair to do licencing info either. It's not very hard to add in an extra row of spaces that nobody would notice, and add additional content to the file specs that wouldn't be hard to miss. I think it would be easier and better to just do images as a whole, instead of bytes. It's already going to be tedious as it is to count the bytes up on everything else.