Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150828040116/@comment-1738746-20150828053944

I think this is a really good idea, but it does have a drawback. I'm afraid that people will rely too heavily on its use for judging good vs bad articles, and then which ones need more help/renovation over others. It's literally just a click and opens itself up to people giving random votes or trolling the system, especially if they see we rely heavily on it. If anons can vote on it, this will especially be the case.

Still, I think it can serve as a useful general benchmark with how articles are doing, so I'm still for the idea.