User blog comment:Madman97/The CHIM Argument: The Renewed Version/@comment-25136035-20150617115302/@comment-11345660-20150622001321

Almost likely, not more than likely. Almost is near but less than likely, more than likely is...more than likely. Let's not get carries away here, and the discussion of CHIM's not being proven is factual given all we have. It has not yet been sufficiently proven. That much is certain, otherwise, there would be no problem. Arguing for CHIM's existence and non-existence would be a theoretical discussion. Aknowledging statistical likelihood (it could go either way at this point) is different than choosing a side. Sorry if I went off on a tangent here, I am a stickler for correctness. I want to make sure we are all on the same page.

And C0DA, well, you can read up on my Rivalries: C0DA blogs on how me and a friend of mine feel about it. It's not a blog that tries to prove a point rather than discuss what we have read.