Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-97.81.240.58-20130603234626/@comment-13446185-20140320034313

Smoking.Chimp wrote: Actually, whether Talos, or any of the other "Divines", really are "Divines" is a non-issue because it is a matter of meagre status (i.e. the difference between a king and a highwayman - which, solely, boils down to posession of a crown or other perceived totem). At most, it is a question of language. How is a "Divine" defined and does Talos fit that definition?

As for the Thalmor being correct - their strategy worked and they successfully incited civil war in Skyrim by taking a non-issue and turning it into the most flimsy excuse possible to abuse the inalienable right of people to freedom of thought. Think spark + air/fuel vapour mixture.

Of course, never confuse being correct or even "right" with doing good. Talos is a god as he mantled Lorkhan. The Thalmor even recognize Talos as a god, they just say he isn't to weaken his influence in Mundus. Though the Thalmor probably have created the illusion among lesser AD associates that Talos is a "False-God", as the Thalmor end-game is quite brutal.

The word Divine, when referring to the "Nine Divines" is a titular term at best. Basically all it says is that the god is worshiped in the "Nine Divines" pantheon, it's practically meaningless as the term could be used to refer to any god as long as the Empire wants to worship them in their pantheon.