User blog comment:Blood Reaper/Skyrim: Confirmed Creatures/@comment-24.106.53.59-20110728130909

http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog_comment:Kacj321/Skyrim_Fan_Interview/@comment-Jason_Fussell-20110707032758/@comment-Acegamer71-20110707181511

There moron - it's the very FIRST question asked. Read it and tell me honestly that isn't a "tight-lipped and elusive response". Basically doesn't directly answer the question at all. Hmmmm. . . . Yeah - that would constitute "elusive". . . . . And where do you get off that "hinted at" = confirmed ???? CONFIRMED is exacly that - CONFIRMED ( i.e. to establish the truth, accuracy, validity, or genuineness of; corroborate; to verify . . . . . Webster's dictionary). "Hinting at", insinuating, implying, is NOT confirmation. Secondly, (for the ANON above me who apparently isn't familiar with the established principles of logical debate), in this case, Mr. Contributor is the one who is purporting his list as "confirmed", hence - FACT. Every logical argument requires 2 elements, a premise and a conclusion. The premise also MUST support (verify) the conclusion. Since he is the one presenting this list as CONFIRMED, it is up to him to prove this list, not up to me to prove jackshit. I have already provided the above link from an interview which clearly demonstrates that were-creatures are by no means confirmed yet. If you (or anyone else for that matter) wants to try to punk me out in here as being wrong, Mr. Contributor (or you) had better provide proof that this list (specifically were-creatures) are CONFIRMED, otherwise fuck off. . . ..