Board Thread:Consensus track/@comment-4787430-20130809213148/@comment-5130940-20130816021804

TombRaiser wrote: Th3Antioch wrote: Eganogard wrote:

Th3Antioch wrote: I agree for the most part, although if someone is new to the game series, and is looking for a character that is in the Dragonborn DLC, but they only know the character is in Skyrim, it might be hard for them to find what they're looking for.

(Example: Guy new to the series is trying to remember the name of his friend's favorite nord. He'll remember when he sees it. He looks under Skyrim: Nords, and doesn't find it, not realizing that Frea is actually in Dragonborn: Nords) That was a good example, and you have a valid point - but there's two ways to look at it. Say someone has Skyrim but doesn't have Dragonborn. Do they want to see content that does not exist in Skyrim listed in Skyrim categories? That's a fair point. I assume in that case the tree/branch system you proposed is probably the best way, but I'm not sure if we can do that on the wiki. Perhaps TombRaiser can clarify for us.

Currently all characters are categorized by game which includes expansions. What you are suggesting would either remove expansions from that list or without removing any of the list categories, add it to the main game's "characters" category.

Eganogard gave the tree/branch example of, Category:Bloodmoon: Characters and Category:Tribunal: Characters should be listed in the Category:Morrowind: Characters category.

So, it is a doable option.

I like the idea, but how would this apply to categories like Category:Skyrim: Vampires (maybe a bad example, considering ) and Category:Skyrim: Merchants?