User blog comment:Zippertrain85/Top 10: Least favorite NPCs./@comment-6336669-20130819074943/@comment-9062114-20130819153545

I think you have good points with most of your list except for number 1. The only person who claims Torygg was willing to negociate is Sybille. And there's evidence against it. Everyone knew he wanted to succeed, If Torygg had any interest in doing it, he wouldn've just done it. The Imperials are the reason the Dominion is IN Skyrim! It's been proven with evidence that the Empire could've won and that the situation we're in is completely unnecessary. He's not racist, the Dunmer are not forced to live anywhere. Where they live is simply the part of the city where they govern themselves. It explains all this in the Decree Of Monument. The Argonians are not forced outside the city, they simply like to keep to themselves and near the water. They were homeless inside the city, where they live now is like a homeless shelter. I've never seen him act like this at all. He never even wanted power, it's the PEOPLE who put him on the throne. He wants to High Kingto help Skyrim. The Empire started the war! The Stormcloaks we're peaceful protestors. The beginning of the game is proof this is a lie. Ulfric being captured is proof that he DOES fight with his soldiers and does NOT do that. But the Empire started attacking them for years, so then they fought back. How does that show he started the war? Why would the Dominion not enforce the Talos ban? Think logically, they hate Talos. The fact that a human became a god defeys all of their beliefs. So it doesn't make any sense that they would not enforce it (or not force the Empire to).

Yes, if he didn't the sign the Concordat the war would've still gone on. Onslaught does NOT equal destruction of the Empire. Try again.