Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26896471-20151004010902/@comment-1738746-20151009020655

Bluesonic1 wrote: I'm not sure anymore if the Forward/Back more than 4 hours is a good option- why? Because looking at it in single options, sure it wins. But when compared to the votes for people who just want a slight change, those big changes are in the minority. And because those changes are so big, all the majority that voted for a small change are likely to not be able to attend the moot anymore (this realisation coming from myself who will be put in that situation if the time moves back by 4 or 4+ hours but I'll still be able to attend if it moves just a few hours back).

I think something should be considered in all of this- do we choose a time that works well for a few or a time that is slightly annoying but still do-able for a large group of people? I say this because while the current moot time suits me beautifully, I get that it doesn't suit others at all, so I'm willing to move to a more inconvenient but still achievable time in order to bring other users into the same situation as me who will then be able to attend the moot, albeit not in fantastic conditions for either of us, but we can still attend nonetheless. Highlight this again for those who haven't read it. If the moot gets moved back by more than 4 hours, those in Australia and nearby timezones would straight up not be able to attend as the moot would fall around 3-5am, which frankly is far worse than the issue that started this whole CT because the moot fell at midnight for them. I want again restate that people should consider an inconvenient but achievable time so that others may do the same and we can have more people at the moot as a result.