Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-10993011-20130618024431/@comment-8248675-20130718175654

That what I always say, Dragonborn have more right to ruby throne then Titus Mede. But Pink here claimes that that will just ruin the story. Not to mention few problems of describing the Dragonborn Emperor after Titus Mede. Although the developers might just use a default for Dovahkin, the Nord model. Just like in Oblivion it was an Imperial and in Morrowind it was Dunmer. It was basically suggested by Greybeards, that our Dovahkin is continuing the legacy of Talos himself. Just like Talos, he or she was found a Dragonborn at the time of important battle, then they were summoned by Greybeards, just like Talos was. Finally, they bestowed the same title on Dragonborn, like on Talos; Yismir-Dragon of the North. (Speaking of which, originaly Yismir was an ancient Nordic devine, who in term used to be Wulfheart of Atmora and was associated with fox. Technically, Wulfheart was the first mortal man to be made a devine and appearantly they also though of him as Avatar of Shor) Also, the time of strife during civil war, is similar, if on a smaler scale to the strife during stormcrown interregnum. Also, did Mede family had any right to crown themselves as Emperors? Shouldn't they have been Potentates instead? Or not being a Dragonborn doesn't matter in the Empire anymore and anyone who wants may contest the ruby throne?