Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26893431-20180203204530/@comment-26893431-20180219154352

Atvelonis wrote: The Crusader of Truth wrote: I have a question, instead of kind of really contributing to this as well as I probably could: Why not just completely skip using stuff like OOG, WOG, DEV, etc, and stick with something like this: The issue is that we still need to identify OOG references through in-text citations, so eventually we do have to come to some sort of decision about the terminology.

Wouldn't Crusader's idea fit that idea though? If we were to use a template, such as UL or DEV, and then just replace the OOG notice with Crusader's proposal for a DEV/UL notice, wouldn't that solve the problem?

Or am I missing something?