Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26893431-20180203204530/@comment-26893431-20180219185533

Atvelonis wrote: Blademaster Jauffre wrote: Wouldn't Crusader's idea fit that idea though? If we were to use a template, such as UL or DEV, and then just replace the OOG notice with Crusader's proposal for a DEV/UL notice, wouldn't that solve the problem?

Or am I missing something? OOG citations are differentiated in the body of an article with tags that look like [OOG 1], [OOG 2], etc., where the ref group is "OOG." We need to choose a new reference group (in this case the group would be named "UL" or "DEV") to replace OOG here. Without one, it would be literally impossible to separate the references into two reference lists. So we're now voting between UL and DEV for which one replaces the OOG ref group?