Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-32767830-20190908182120/@comment-25356303-20191006161635

My main concern would be that the titles differ between some iterations of books, as you pointed out, so we'd have to stick with just one, as we currently do. e.g. The Annotated Anuad vs. A Children's Anuad. I think a lot of those points are not really the end of the world for #3, because we already have the general book information combined in a manageable format (just without the corresponding content), but nevertheless I agree that the second option would be cleaner.

Another question: suppose we're referencing a book that has some changes between two games, but that the section of the book we're referencing is the same. Do we reference the disambiguation page, or link one of the individual versions, even though it would maybe be slightly misleading, because it would imply that that info isn't in the other one? My preference would be the disambig for this reason. We should also decide if we're transcluding the individual pages onto the disambig, or just linking to the pages.