Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24627553-20140316230248/@comment-28667390-20160921020410

I find a lot of this interesting and see good points on both sides, but  I believe it all comes down to if it is officially seen in game. MK is a very witty writer and has great influence on the lore, but that doesn't make him the decider of what's canon. He could say "The Nerevarine was a sheep" and it obviously wouldn't be true. Chances are the writers look at us having these debates and laugh. They purposely do this. It makes us wonder "what is truth"? That's why we have books in game contradict each other. Did Ulfric take Skyrim or Tullius? Is Paarthurnax dead? Was the Emperor assassinated?