Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4799587-20140912224150/@comment-1600847-20140916121526

Bluesonic1 wrote:

@Draevan13: I wasn't clinging to the argument you highlight there and I apologise if I came across that way. My point was, using GramsJ's case to highlight, is that each person with the admin title worked hard to achieve it, and we don't know under what circumstances they left, and I find it sad that some people automatically assumed it was because of laziness, when it could have been something like a serious illness in GramsJ's case. Removing their adminship kind of is personal if you think about it; it's a pretty big achievement that person has gotten through a lot of hard work, something may have happened to them out of their control, and now a bunch of people get to decide to strip that person of their merit without knowing any better? You don't find that a little bit heart breaking? I find it odd you assume anyone who votes against her doesn't know she has cancer. I do, I remember her leaving 2 years ago. I still voted against her.

As Harold and I have said on the voting page itself, removing her Admin rights is not permanent. If she comes back, they can be returned in an instant with the click of a button. Normally I wouldn't mind her keeping them, but it's been 2 years. For all we know, she could have beaten cancer but just forgotten about this site and will never come back.