Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26896471-20151004010902/@comment-4544033-20151010180855

For the record, the fact you are doing this, despite being so new to the community compared to the rest of us, is amazing. Most people we have to pull in to get involved and you have jumped in and that is something I am grateful for, even if we do not see eye to eye on this deal.

And truth be told, if I was the only one out of the moot, and we where gaining more people, I think I could live with it, but as you said, we are also losing Blue, and Jarjarkine said that six hours would be impossible for him as well. While I want as many people as possible involved, I do think losing voices of experience would undermine what the moot is able to do. Despite the amount of people who show up on average (I think about 7 or 8) we have help start up some decent things, and handle matters that we don't need to do a CT for, but want community approval over just the admins. I feel this has worked well, as each admin has had at least one idea altered or removed entirely. This keeps the Admins humbled and once a week I am reminded that there are editors who want this community to grow, and want to be involved with it. While a wiki is made up of individuals, we do need to communicate with each other, and I feel it has made this wiki better.

I just want to make it clear, that I do respect what you are doing Brokiin, and there is nothing wrong in wanting to make sure everybody has a voice, I do see a logic in this, its just I see it in a different way.