Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131113224543/@comment-160529-20140101221321

Octo8 wrote: Yes, because we're talking about ecclestial laws here! Certainly! Makes perfect sense! Has Sheogorath blessed you or what's the matter? God damn...

But you certainly do seem to have an ecclestial mindset: Kirkbridge should not be considered canon, because that would be misinforming people, because his works aren't canon.... perfect circular logic. Your entire post is trying to argue that MK's work is non-canonical by pre-assuming his work is non-canonical. THAT is a fallacy in fact: Assuming the antecedent. All your arguiments only work if you assume already BEFORE that MK's works are not canon; hence they are not valid arguments at all.

what the hell are you talking about.

for the purpose of the arguement... yes we are, but the gods in question are not ones of fiction. But the gods are the creators and developers of the elder scrolls universe.

have you ever heard the phrase "word of god" when pertaining to fiction? You are treating kirkbride as if he is the metaphorical god, when he is in fact... not.