Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-6528030-20140124224808/@comment-6528030-20140128013434

Sky Above,Voice Within wrote: I feel as if a lot, if not all, of the problems stated here could be solved by creating different rooms, although I believe this is up to the Wikia staff. On the topic matter, the chat is not supposex to be an overall serious talking place, and, as such, the rules that apply to other spaces are to be toned down. Moving on to the age issue, I'm actually fairly upset you even brought this up. If i recall correctly, the age for joining any of Wikia's domains is 13, so no further checking on age on any of this Wiki's spaces. Conversation between other people should not be regulated according to the age of bystanders, regardless of what the rating given to the games is. rooms is what I have brought up previously many times and as well as here.

Age issue is an issue, respect of others is an issue, respect in general is an issue, (speaking of chat alone).... I am a father of three kids... youngest is 14, I would not allow her on the chat because her age is NOT respected in terms of SOME of the discussions appearing in said chat. MY POINT again!... Although the Games age restrictions are higher, this wiki allows from 13 and up to join, then it needs to regulate itself for that paticular age group as a whole. If YOUR child is subjected to such language and sexual inuendos as I have seen in the chat would you not agree that it is inappropiate to do so? If a Child of 13 is allowed to be here than the site itself needs to recognize them and respect them as such.. (A Child)... Raise the age requierment if you want to talk nasty, and those that lie are the ones that parental guideance is not there to begin with... but the ones that are 13 and here have a right NOT to be subjected to such things.

"Conversations between other people should not be regulated according to the age of bystanders"

So you think it appropiate to cuss and carry on about sex in PUBLIC, in front of children, (because that is what the chat is, PUBLIC), is appropiate?

I can see this is a pointless argument...