Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25020300-20141230050558/@comment-1738746-20150110024039

I've editing a while there now myself, and I can say that if an unconfirmed bug doesn't get added it's because no one physically adds it themselves, not because someone comes around and removes it. Yes, of course it's better if they can have confirmed bugs, but they understand that it's not always possible, hence the unconfirmed template.

But that again brings us to the issue brought up by the OP- bugs need to be confirmed via our Talk pages before being added, no one uses the Talk pages anymore so no bugs get confirmed on the Wiki and so no bugs ever get added. It's a vicious cycle with a truly subjective core- if a bug is known on other websites, why is it not deemed confirmed? When is a bug on our Talk page deemed confirmed? My point is that our Talk pages are not law, and they shouldn't be the sole method for confirming bugs.

You take my comment far too personally. I never mentioned your name specifically Ghost, I did say admins in general. NOTATHALMORSPY has also pointed out that enforcement of these policies varies across the admins, so it can't be that subjective especially considering the OP's main reason for starting this has also been because of the lack of consistency for policy enforcement.