Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-28664595-20160605220956/@comment-26896471-20160607000047

Blademaster Jauffre wrote: Bronkiin wrote: Agreed, it should be taken with a grain of salt. That is a bit of a step back from saying it has no place on the wiki. It does. But we flag it quite strongly as being OOG and needs treating with skepticism. The point is that you really can't see which parts of an article belong to one source and which belong to the other. I don't even know why it's added if it should be taken with a grain of salt. You can see which parts belong where. They are very clearly signalled with "OOG" next to every out of game citation. There is also a notice at the top of the page. It should be taken with a grain of salt (as opposed to dismissed) because MKs work continues to be used by Bethesda, as linked above, and because of his extensive work while contracted and semi-contracted for them.