Board Thread:Online Discussion/@comment-14350577-20131024162905/@comment-26332923-20150813181805

Draevan13 wrote: Platinum Luffy wrote: 1) No because your statement about us discussing about the fact that they're under the control of the Dominion makes zero sense.

2) And? It doesn't matter that he disagrees. What are you talking about? 1) All right, let's go back a bit, there seems to be a bit of confusion here.

You said: " And thus they control the Empire. "

I said " The Empire wouldn't be getting ready to fight the Dominion if they were under their control. "

You said: " Why not? What does being under control have to do with anything? "

What do you mean by that sentence? It seems to be the source of the confusion. It looks like you're saying "Why are we talking about the Empire being under the Dominion's control?".

2) You asked what Ifnsman meant when he/she said " That would make the case for the Empire even stronger, then." I was explaining that. 1. No, that's not confusing me. That's what's confusing you. And i don't know why, but i'll explain;

What i meant was how does the fact that the Empire is under their control change the fact they could fight back? You left out the my example, which was really useful; " It's just like revolutionaries" . I don't see how that could cause a confusion. I explained clearly what i meant.

2. No, you didn't, because your point is invalid. Even if you explained what he meant, your point is invalid therefore it's useless.