Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-10789912-20151206230221/@comment-26320799-20151207042913

This isn't exactly what I and Crusader intended to propose. I am aware that the doc is quite a mess and I only comment to explain what was supposed to happen as well as what went down during the moot.

1. It wasn't anywhere near ready. Even I took into account that it was restricting in areas and meant to edit it. But as of now with the doc already shared even I agree with a majority of this thread.

2. It was proposed far too early, and not explained very well. By the time I entered the moot, there was mass confusion over the right to swear or not. (The intention was to avoid burning people). Under no circumstances did I wish to limit anybody's freedom within the chat. Again, serious editing was needed before the proposal but it was shared within the moot before I was able to edit.

3. The use of rules as guidelines to avoid drama and collisions with mods wasn't the best idea. I'll take the burn on this fault. All this really was meant to be was a suggestion to avoid drama and such. Turning to the rules was the first idea, and ended up being not the best (clearly).

I will say this thread is impressive and does prove many points towards the argument. But, I'd only like to clarify what the doc's initial purpose was for. I would like to be the one to step forward and apologize for the confusion that's spawned off of this howefer.

Kudos on the detail Shawn, and as for the users, I hope I was able to clear the confusion of the doc's intentions.

Ralvz&#39;jeshka Shakaraph (talk) 04:29, December 7, 2015 (UTC)