Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-26213507-20150928140042/@comment-24075086-20151002150544

Draevan13 wrote: Phantasys wrote:

What? Are you drunk or something? Why would things made by their owner not be canon because one writer was replaced? Ignoring your weak attaempt at an ad hominem, it's because you said the tie-in novels weren't canon because MK didn't write them. That implies you think anything TES that MK didn't work on isn't canon.

No...I did not say works by bethesda aren't canon after mk left...I said the very opposite. Works done by MK after he left bethesda aren't canon because they're not bethesda approved. Of course bethesda's works are canon.