Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1738746-20150714113923/@comment-1738746-20150720051749

@Sajuuk: Oh I know DarthOrc said that, and I completely agree with your response regarding it. What I'm trying to point out is that DarthOrc has been suggesting this whole time different places to put speculation in when a CT has already passed saying speculation goes in Trivia, and the point of this CT is to better define the policy of said Trivia section.

@DarthOrc: "As for the CT about Trivia, the solution clearly doesn't work - hence this discussion." I really don't think you understand the point of this CT; please re-read my first post. Speculation is already allowed on articles, restricted to the Trivia section- we're not debating this as it's already been voted on, passed and works. This CT is to better define the policy on said Trivia section with regards to points of speculative nature, mostly because people apparently keep adding either huge theories to the section or unreferenced nonsense. The hope is that a better defined policy will help better guide users when they want to submit something of speculative nature to the Trivia section or to help proofreaders know what is ok or not ok to remove and avoid possible edit wars.