Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150520003550/@comment-4544033-20150520072141

Nomar the Nomarian wrote: So my question would be: are we nominating articles that we consider to be "good" for being our "featured" articles? Because if we are, than I am all for there being only one standard. My reason being, we can then point to our other "good" articles and say see this is an article which we can feature. As it already meets our highest standards. If being "good" is a step bellow being featured, then no, I do not agree. If the real question is: should a good article also be a fetured article? Then my question is: why do we have both? What does being featured mean?

I would like to know more before I cast my vote.

Remember: knowing is half the battle, the rest is all lasers...

Nomar, the Nomarian We are voting to make the standards for both the same. Both are highly identical with a few differences. If this is approved, good articles will be asked to meet the same standards as Featured, and the only difference between the two will be that featured articles have appeared on the front page. At the same time, good articles that do not meet the standards will be removed. We will assign some of these articles to guilds for repairs, but some are to small to do anything with.