Board Thread:Consensus track/@comment-4787430-20130806031837/@comment-5308644-20130812005029

TombRaiser wrote: It does sound reasonable to use Sublocations when needed, but individual pages shouldn't be created for sublocations, unless that location really is too huge to include all sublocations, an example of that would be Blackreach in Skyrim, it is a huge location and most of the sublocations would probably benefit from being on an individual page.

I guess I did not phrase that correctly. I was not suggesting creating articles for sublocations.

I support the use of sublocation headers if needed, because there are a lot of MW sublocations articles that already exist and need to be merged. When that happens headers will be probably be needed.

TombRaiser wrote: Eganogard wrote: It is my understanding that the lead is a brief overview of the article's subject. I am concerned that if it is not followed by a header that allows a more detailed description, location articles can end up with unusually long leads in comparison to other subjects, and push the table of contents down the page where it seems out of place. We can insert manually, but I highly prefer limiting the size of the lead and using a header.

Maybe this would be another case of "use it when it's needed". But, not under a "Description" header. The "Background" header seems to be the most widely used header for adding additional details on a subject. Can we agree to use the "Background" header if it's needed?

I believe that I am the only person who favors a header and limiting the size of leads. In that case I see no reason to even consider it, and humbly withdraw my earlier comments.