Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-10789912-20151024221847

CynicalEarth wrote: Sajuuk may not deserve this ban, but anyone who can muster enough neurons and brain cells knows Sajuuk's reputation cannot redeem him by itself. Whenever someone disagrees with him or opposes his ideas, said Wikian always plays his harassement card and does everything in his imaginary power to encourage other users to "gang up" on whomever he perceives as "trolling", "oppresing", "harassing", et cetera.

Now, we aren't taking events into account here, since reports seem to disagree and no one has yet provided evidence behind any claim stated both here and on chat.

What I say, however, is that we should leave the current settings as they are. May his latest block remind him that throwing a issy fit whenever the ol' moment of the month occurs will not shield him against local policies.

Upon returning, Sajuuk attempted to become Administrator by becoming Patroller. When someone whose username I have forgotten blocked him, he swore never to return as this wiki was beyond help and unworthy of his unfathomable wisdom and knowledge.

Upon returning once again, Sajuuk once again attempted to help our community... by asking others to suggest ways to do just that even though 'twas his idea. When "people" (for all intents and purposes) exposed his inability to provide suggestions after creating a thread designed for just that, Spey once again became so agitated that his undergarnments entangled themselves and got stuck in his asscrack.

So the question here isn't whether or not Tim Hortons was right in blocking him -- something I can't argue since I didn't witness the event -- but rather:

Should we leave his ban and hope his temper dampens, or welcome him again and hope his temper doesn't cause a third storm? Reputation means nothing. Literally nothing. Snow, you of all people should know this- reputation only goes as deep as the offended's pathetic feelings.

You and I both had a very bad reputation at one point. We have users traded snuff films for a laugh. We have people whom have openly voiced their hatred for each other. Again, reputation means nothing. If someone gets offended because of text online- that's on them. Generally, I think they're pathetic as well, if they base their entire view on someone because of "he said I was annoying once ;(". Those people shouldn't have internet service.

I won't even bother countering your "drama causing" argument with history of events on the wiki, but we all know I could do so very easily.

Next argument?