Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4544033-20160207013932/@comment-26107850-20160207202344

Atvelonis wrote:

High Goddess Venus-Afrodite-Finelia wrote: We should've CT:t that. Not CT:ing it was clearly against moot policy. I hope you're happy taking the choice away from the users :/ 2/7 people who voted thought it should be taken to CT, Fin. That wasn't contentious enough for it. If you really want you can start a CT now. The whole status article thing has nothing to do with taking away choices from users and everything to do with efficiency. The nominations system was extremely slow and rarely worked properly, so this is an improvement.

CT:ing shouldn't be a matter of vote. And I disagree, it is taking a choice away and they should have a say in it. But as for the actual system goes, I like the council idea and I think it will be a huge improvement. :3