Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-9062114-20140217190926/@comment-24999978-20140805121256

HahnDragoner523 wrote: So to put it short: The answer to this thread is "Everybody can decide that for themselves"?

I agree 100% with 73.35.

But i also agree with King in the North.

The question now is if Bethesda-unconfirmed MK-writings, such as C0DA, should be marked as non-canon lore in wiki. How do we treat that? I think they already do that. If you scrolls down to the 'References' secton on 'The Towers' page, for example, they make a note of that, saying:

'The following are out-of-game references. They are not found in any in-game books, but can still be considered part of The Elder Scrolls lore and are included for completeness.'

Which I think is a good way of putting it.