Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150520003550

As I mentioned in the last weekly update. I have a growing concern about our standards for good and featured articles. Some of our good articles do not meet the standards of featured, and this is extremely frustrating.

The two have similar standards, but a key difference is article size. Good article rule 15 says: "...counting the introduction and "Trivia" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc)."

our standards for good and featured articles can be seen Here and here. What I propose is that the standards be merged into one set of rules so that all articles from this point forward that become good are already at our standards and we just need to pick on to be featured via standard voting.

As for existing good articles, we will give them one month, starting at the time of this CT's closing, to meet the standards or they will be removed.

So, what do we all say in this matter.  