User blog comment:Thedoucheinthenorth/Skyrim alignment charts-verdict?/@comment-4113369-20120804192048

This old trope? Morality is a rather complex thing; it feels like you're over-simplifying it when you break it down into nine categories. Still, most of them make sense, so maybe I'm overestimating the concept...

Have to disagree with your choices for lawful & chaotic good, though. Ulfric is trying to enforce his own law, which by nature means he isn't chaotic, despite starting a rebellion (I could be mistaken here, I never really delved too deep into D&D morality). I would also hardly call him good (I'd rather use words like "greedy", "short-sighted" or just plain "dumb"), but there have already been a metric ton of discussions on that subject, so I won't bother going into that.

Isran and the Dawnguard, meanwhile... Well, they're certainly lawful, but hunting vampires indiscriminately is hardly what I would call "good". The feral ones are real bastards, true, but not all vampires are evil. They believe what they're doing is good, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is. I'd probably peg them as "lawful neutral" as a whole.