Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150415101511/@comment-1600847-20150425004859

Bluesonic1 wrote:

Draevan13 wrote:

Madman97 wrote: Wait, if it was already gone over, what the heck are we doing digging up old arguments for? I'm honestly with Dave in saying that this is an issue that should have been left alone. I feel like there are more pressing matters at hand. Sajuuk brought it up, but he did vote AGAINST removing GramsJ's rights back when it was first raised (only Harold and I voted for, it was 13 against 2 for if I recall). This is why we're confused about your comments Draevan; you have a go at us because "This issue should have been done and moved on from months ago, for or against." and after pointing out that is was indeed done with and moved on from months ago, you still support Sajuuk re-dredging this consensus? If you're really so annoyed about this whole situation being re-dredged, have a go at Sajuuk, not us. If it doesn't annoy you and you are simply voting with your opinion, then please do so without having a go at the opposition for their opinion over it- we will only respect your opinion on the matter so long as you respect ours, it's a two-way street my friend. I'm not "having a go at you", or anyone here. I'm stating my opinion on this issue. I appologize if I came off that way, it wasn't my intent.

And the issue wasn't resolved a few months ago: barely anyone voted (15 or so) vs this vote where nearly every active user (30 or so) has voted.