User blog comment:Zippertrain85/Why the Stormcloaks are right part 2/@comment-178.119.43.248-20130829124637

"Why exactly are we debating giants again?"

Because your singular example of Ulfric caring about non-Nords is his right hand man having peaceful, harmless Giants assassinated, while his supporters are vocally describing them as 'monsters' based on race, not actions.

"There is no segregation of the Dunmer. I explained how the Decree of Monument explains why they're in that position."

Define segregation in a way that does not include forcing a group of people to live in a specific area of the city.

"How would Viola Giordano possibly know this? Or have the power to raise taxes? It makes no sense."

Where did I say she has the power to raise taxes? She doesn't. She just has the pretenatural power of basic arithmetic and therefore can compare two numbers -specifically, how much taxes a Dunmer is paying and how much taxes a Nord is paying- and see that, lo and behold, the latter is lower.

"Cetching a killer takes a lot more then man-power."

Oh come on, this is turning into a lightbulb joke. How many Stormcloaks does it take to follow a trail of blood a street wide?

"What in the game shows that he doesn't understand politics? As a Jarl he should know politics, the whole Civil War is based on politics. If anything, it seems he had more political knowledge then Torygg."

The fact he lost to Torygg, politically, on two occasions. If he's the better politician and leader, why did the Jarls elect Torygg? Someone, I can't quite recall who, said that the Jarls should know politics, so they knew what they were doing. Furthermore, if he is a better politician, why did he fail to defeat Torygg politically?

Torygg was both deemed a better politician by his peers and subsequently proved his superiority in a test of direct skill. It is when Ulfric lost that he took the brute's way out.