Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131113224543/@comment-24358064-20140102024632

Okay, so I suppose we might in the end say similar things. The compromise would then be that yes, you can bring up MK references, even as argument in a discussion, but you have to accept that some will find them to be non-canonical. By the same token, the other side can say they don't consider those texts canonical, but will have to accept that they cannot shut down the debate with that argument. But I disagree on that there are any specific MK texts that should be held back. For one, I can't see any that are *specificalyl* controversial and second, well, you can only call then "lore distorting" if you preassume they aren't themselves canon ;)