Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3076045-20150927085345/@comment-4984687-20150928165809

Fghfghfgh510 wrote: The Rim of the Sky wrote:

"We also have to take the novels and the in-game books into account, which can date between Oblivion and Skyrim."

You're correct, I should have touched on that. I won't type as much this time I hope.

My idea to account for the books is to use the most recent books first (like the V books for now) and then IV, and so on. The book information can go with the game it goes with, essentially. The better solution is to use years. Oblivion was in 3E 433 and Skyrim was in 4E 201, and using years would work better than mentioning the game. All lore articles should still take into account all history, dating up to the most recent events in that happened as of Skyrim so that an article isn't missing any information.