Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-24349111-20140611203956/@comment-24274106-20140620061733

HumbleDaedricServant wrote: SuperSajuuk wrote:

Likes-That-Tail wrote: Spey, (Spey is Sajuuk, btw) something that makes the mods (at least in chat) seem superior is how some of them constantly break rules and then either only get told to stop by another mod or they don't get told anything at all. If a user is punished for breaking a rule, the mods should be punished for breaking that rule as well. We shouldn't tolerate mods breaking rules, they're supposed to be role models. Yes, I agree. Mods should not be given free license to do what they want. Hence, it ties back to the idea that mods are meant to be equal and not above other users. Exactly. I totally agree with this.

Then it seems to me like the moderators themselves are the problem. It's not that the names are colored, and it's that the mods themselves need to be removed and replaced. If a moderator breaks a rule that other users would be banned for, we definitely shouldn't need to consensus them for their powers to be revoked. They should lose their powers immediately and be banned, just like they'd be if they didn't have a flag.

Off topic: we've had three consensuses to remove the rights of staff members within 36 hours. Aren't we having a re evaluation soon? These posts are getting excessive. Please stop.