Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20140704200351/@comment-9062114-20140704202658

ShawnHowellsCP wrote: Zippertrain85 wrote: ShawnHowellsCP wrote: Zippertrain85 wrote: Likes-That-Tail wrote: Zip, I respect what you're trying to do, but it is only going to make it worse. Since the drama has reached other parts of the sites, shutting down to chat will lead to more drama outside of the chat. Not only that, but as soon as the chat is back, the drama will continue. Not only that, but this consensus will not be one sided at all. I guarantee it, and no matter how it plays out, whether the consensus passes or not, there will be even more drama by people bickering about this consensus. The answer to the problem is to actually enforce the rules of the chat, not to shut down the chat. We tried that LTT, but these issues involve Moderators too who are biased for their side of things. Drama could come up, but if that was the case it could rooted out much quicker, as on Wikis everything is written down and in the open, while in the chat people musrt rely on gossip and rumours. My point is, drama outside the chat is much easier to deal with. There is no drama. You and Spey are in a pety argument so you take it out on everyone. You are the one being bias. But, hey. You couldn't have done anything wrong. Must be all our users. Shawn, don'y you think you're being biased by acting like it's just two users who are responsible for everything? And didn't you resign because of all the drama, why are you denying it all the sudden? Because I actually can see what is going on; and don't you pull the bias card on me. I am the only person who actually stood up for the normal users at all, and the only one with the eyes to see it is all you and spey.

Or so I thought. People seem to agree with me. Maybe we should stop this before it becomes a petty "I'm right, you're wrong" discussion (which it already has.)

Also, Majority Opinion =/= Truth.