Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-10789912-20151109180419/@comment-10789912-20151116192355

1) A misunderstanding on your end. Saying you have no business here, does not mean you have no right to be here. If you can't understand a simple phrase, you should stay out of any business above working at a McDonalds register. You've managed to completely derail the thread, which leads me to the obvious choice/route of action.

2) I'm going to go the route of the majority. That's how the world works. If the majority believes something, you mention it. Notice I never asserted she was deceased, and even said that I had no clue which of the three options (which were provided for a reason) she fell under, and it didn't matter to the site at all. Like always, you need to have someone you target just to make yourself relevant. The second Spey was banned, I called this. In a CT, you mention every possibility and give background for it.

'''Notice "Funerary" is in quotations, as to question it itself. Notice I said "perhaps", and it was up to the community to chose. Notice the entire section detailing the fact that she very well could still be alive.'''I hope that one day you will learn to read, as to make yourself useful.

3) You're doing the exact opposite. You're purposefully using trigger words to start an argument, because that's simply what you're known for. You and Bluesonic1 had, and continue to have, no debate at all to offer, yet feel you need to be in the spotlight. If you wanted people to stick to facts, you can easily achieve that by listing one thing that could be seen as fact. If actually having reasoning makes me an edgelord, I'll take it over childish idiocy and blind egotism any day.