Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140808194933/@comment-10906938-20140809223615

Sajuuk, I really think this is not a wise way to campaign against Jimeee. I think if it was done in a private setting where you confronted Jimeee and asked him for an explanation instead of taking it to the streets and raising a riot, a compromise could be made. Is it just (as in, morally correct) to strip him wholesale of all of his powers? Has he done enough harm to outweigh the benefits he brings to the wiki? Some of the evidence provided is over a year old. That must also be considered. That bit about Jimeee not being allowed to vote is rubbish. As stated above, that's unfair to him. I think that there are other ways to go about this issue than making a consensus. Then things tend to get out of hand, and what might have been fixed with something like an official warning have turned into a widespread call for blood. Only without the blood. Statements about him censoring those that oppose him seem very paranoid and pointless. If he had some sort of influence over others with his position, then maybe, but I really don't think there would be a reason for him to censor things.