Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-27007772-20140611204941/@comment-26356342-20150618020020

71.51.129.218 wrote: Am I the only person who is pretty sure Bethesda tried to give picking a side no wrong answer as much as possible I mean there are two jarls on each side that annoy a lot of people (maven black briar and jarl siddgire or however you spell it on the empires side and the jarls of winterhold and dawnstar on the stormcloaks side) both leaders have their faults and both sides will realize that the thalmor have been benefiting from this,and on the topic of elisif and ulfic I think neither should be high king/queen as ulfic is to brash and elisif is to inexspirenced That, I do agree with. I had always assumed the next game would make mention of the conflict, but ultimately leave it ambiguous as to who the "victor" was. (with both ulfric and elisif both dead) With an explination like "the new high king brokered a deal with the empire to cecede and become independant but asked that imperial soldiers still maintain a pressence" or something like that.