User talk:PLPellegrini



Welcome, !

Hello, welcome to the Elder Scrolls Wiki! We're building a collaborative source of information for the Elder Scrolls, and we need your help. We saw you making some changes to our articles, and thank you for it. Hope you choose to further this project, and that we'll see you around in the future. If you choose to stay, here are some links to help you out:

Editing policies
 * Policies and Guidelines
 * Manual of Style
 * Media policies

Help out
 * Getting started
 * Pages needing attention
 * Image requests

User policies
 * User signatures
 * User images

FAQ
 * Help overview
 * Editing help

I hope you enjoy editing here! If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask one of our administrators.


 * --TombRaiser (talk) 21:39, August 15, 2013 (UTC)

Signature Help
Yep. It was actually supposed to do that. Just about every wiki does that, as it is the same process everywhere, and it affects every wiki on which you visit. (I guess the argument could be made that we could just copy the text from that site to ours, though). Thanks for letting me know, though - but yeah, for now, I designed it to do that, because that wikia is designed for those sorts of questions :) Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 10:36, November 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * Apologies. I did not realise that it did that. Perhaps we should, indeed, have one on our site, then. Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 11:53, November 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * No need to apologize, I was just reporting it. It's good to know it's fixed now.
 * PLPellegrini (talk) 20:05, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Keys
Hmm. Personally, I believe they should all be listed (only). I mean, sure, they could probably be listed in a table (i.e. if someone wanted too, they could add their ref id, and another row for where it is found. (I.e. location or person). But I personally dont think they are noteworthy enough to warrant an entire page for each key. (There are literally thousands upon thousands of keys - and the overwhelming majority of them are useless except for this one loot box, which can often be opened using lockpicks or an Unlock Spell (Depending upon preference or game). To add to that - we don't have pages for things such as Redware fork, for example, for much the same reason. Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 13:10, November 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * My point exactly. The table layout in Keys (Dragonborn) is so much better for it leaves no need for new pages, which would be extensive work and data space. My suggestion was use the table format in Keys (Dragonborn) as a standard for the Keys page. Simplicity itself.
 * PLPellegrini (talk) 13:36, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree. We already have an agreed method of dealing with keys. They should all have their own page based on game or add-on as was done on Keys (Dragonborn). The Keys pages simply need to be split up with links pointing to all the relevant key sub-pages. Books is a perfect example of how it should be done. Jimeee (talk) 15:18, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * For further clarification, of course a proper page isn't needed for each and every key. That's insanity. However if we take Keys (Dragonborn) as an example - I did in fact create a page then redirect the page to the overview Keys pages. Like this: http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/Alor_House_Key?redirect=no
 * Then using the, this allows you to link directly to the row in the table. If you wish to undertake such a project, I suggest you check out how Keys (Dragonborn) was created and use that as a standard example. Jimeee (talk) 16:55, November 20, 2013 (UTC)