Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150326212135/@comment-27030334-20150330154907

I removed a contribution from an Anon about how a reanimated Lund says "At last" when killed from the trivia in the Lund's Hut article. I debated on leaving it, but it seemed too obvious that it did not belong. My reasoning is that many reanimated NPCs say "At last" when killed, and even if that was unique dialogue exclusive to Lund it should have gone in the article about Lund, not the one about his house. Is that a valid reason for removal?

Another time I removed something from the trivia in the article about the fat Dwemer guy from Morrowind (Can't remember his name at the moment) due to perceived speculation. I came to that conclusion because I saw the word "possibly" in the piece of trivia. Well a couple days later I thought I may have jumped the gun when I removed the piece of trivia, plus since I'm not that much of a TES lore expert, I thought it would be best to revert my change.

I guess my point is, if possible a policy should worked out to prevent stuff like my first example from ending up in trivia, yet also prevent the second example of users with out enough knowledge on a subject from deleting possibly relevant info.

I wish I could offer a good solution. I could recommend that only developer confirmed trivia is included in articles which a policy on the Mass Effect wiki. However there is for example stuff like the H. P. Lovecraft references in the articles about the Lurkers, Seekers, and Hermaeus Mora that may or may not be confirmed by the developers but seem relevant.