Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-11458474-20130926235435/@comment-25109952-20130927182431

GarouxBloodline wrote: Man of steak wrote: Sorry, but you should put that back on. You have no reason to delete it, it should stay there, and I'm pretty sure it is confirmed trivia. Speculation is against wiki policy here. And no, there wasn't a source footer verifying its truth, meaning that yes, it is indeed speculation, and I was right to remove it.

Spectulation is also half the lore we have at the wiki. Whether confirmed or not, you should not delete anything like that.

Nobody said it was spectulation in the first place, did they? You can't dictate whether or not to delete something just because you think it is spectulation.

Heck, the Lady in the Lake reference isn't even confirmed to be a reference, neither are any easter eggs on the wiki. Why not delete all of them too?