Board Thread:Consensus track/@comment-3186827-20130128181104/@comment-4043978-20130215205531

Why, I wonder, would the news articles be so constrained by a grey area such as neutral point of view? Why can fans of a long-term series not simply digress and address their interests with informal expression?

Okay, in many ways, neutrality is essential where the progression (kind of like when news trails off into opinions and stuff) of articles are concerned; I support that idea in certain ways. For example, where and when formality becomes discourse: on occasion, it can get out of hand...but forcing others to stick to the point and topic in question may not alleviate the space between what is solid source, and what isn't.

Wait a minute! I read you wrong, Jimeee! Chatter is appropriate for forums and blog posts only, I apologize for the misinterpretation there. Therefore, I steadily agree with and support this move; this is a big step for the wiki, and a good one. Oops... :l (I need to work on that. I can't rely on guesswork alone.)