Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140825123912/@comment-26474238-20140828031847

Zurgane wrote: GarouxBloodline wrote: Zurgane wrote: RevolveGirl wrote: Disabling all Anon edits doesn't seem reasonable to me. They should still get to edit. They shouldn't hoowever get to make new pages. That should be for users with accounts to do. God&#39;s Army (talk) 02:35, August 28, 2014 (UTC) Look, sweetheart, I've been to many wikis and they all seem to face some kind of issue with anonymous users. In the event of extreme vandalism by anon users (which is clearly the case here, if you get vandalized by anons on a daily basis) logic dictates that anon edits should be disabled. The good faith contributors wouldn't have an issue with signing up for the wiki with an actual account, while most vandals would be deterred. Get a clue before running your mouth. Ad hominem, condescension, and narcissism rolled up into one neat bundle - buy now for the best way for people to take your opinions seriously. She seems to have gotten the message. Maybe it's your turn next? Not even going to dignify your arrogance with a proper response.