User blog comment:Deyvid Petteys/Bethesda Reads Our Wiki?/@comment-69.217.203.55-20120712132545/@comment-2041582-20120712165703

He has a point. I own it on the PC, so I'm not really complaining, except of course, for having to wait out Dawnguard and the next DLC, which I mostly blame Microsoft for. Bethesda better be in some kind of financial debt for making that deal with Microsoft, which might explain why I'm not expecting much from this "expansion pack" hence the bad reviews. Either they're too lazy or they're running out of funds in which they're decreasing their budget. However, I'm still getting it for crossbows, etc. and how some mods will require it and even make it better. Aside from that, games that seem to run on Bethesda's engines always seem to be poorly optimized for the PS3 (wasn't Fallout: New Vegas like that?). Bugs exist on every platform, and Bethesda is infamous for them (I can sometimes respect that because their RPGs are huge-scale and there's a lot of things that can be overlooked), but PS3 runs on an OS that's entirely different from the PC and Xbox360, so that will always lead to more bugs and even gamebreakers (depending on how obvious the gamebreakers are, it's either a sign of laziness, faulty methods, or terrible deadlines). I also think Sony imposes a lot of restrictions on what can reach their platforms. Microsoft won't allow mods on their platform without SOME form of profit from it (meaning Microsoft would want you to pay $0.99 (or whatever your country's currency is) or some differing amount per mod), and I don't think Sony does either, or even wants modding to exist on their platform at all. It probably is part of Bethesda's fault, but it's also a matter of circumstance.