Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-10993011-20130618024431/@comment-80.216.214.210-20130822000213

Pickleseller wrote: 80.216.214.210 wrote: Pickleseller wrote: 80.216.214.210 wrote: VAULTEER wrote: Still modeled after it. Still the same rules. Still the same idea. Just a different leader. And that present leader is making humans second-class citizens and blatantly failing in keeping his empire safe.

Same rules?

So Talos worship was always banned?

Altmer could always killed anyone they pleased?

Same idea?

Elves were alway making the rules for everyone else?

Somehow I doubt that. Can you stop with this? Cant stop what I didn't start. Dovahkiin is the only one whose rise to the throne makes sense, after stopping Alduin the Dovahkiin is at the height of they're power and taking Cyrodiil and crushing the AD is pretty much what's left. You made it seem like that, by the way you were acting.

Anyway, the Dragonborn shouldn't be the Emperor. You know why? Since you are assuming that the Dragonborn killed Titus, why would they have the person who killed both Gaius and Commander Maro, as well as a member of the DB? Only in some peoples minds...

First off, in no way is that particular DB mission required to make Dovahkiin Emperor.

Second how is it common knowledge among the people of Tamriel which DB assassin killed Titus?

The only one who would know is the DB and Titus, who is dead.

All the Dovahkiin would need to do is introduce themselves to the Elder Council and present themselves, show how all the problems Tamriel is facing happened when they stopped having a Dragonblood Emperor and what do you know Dovahkiin happens to have Dragonblood hint hint.