Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-29461586-20140228123159/@comment-24261859-20140228205706

First of all, it is nearly unenforcable. I myself have only recently (as in, a few days ago) passed the age requirement for "mature" games, but have falsified my age many times, mostly on Steam just for the sake of buying games like Skyrim. There is no reason to expect that the same will not happen with the wiki, and there is no way to check.

Secondly, there are some people, like Sky Above, who are mature yet below that limit. You say that exceptions can be made, but that introduces an absurd grey area. What exactly defines adequate maturity to be made an exception? Who gets to be the judge of that? And, as has been stated, if younger members are prohibited from contributing, how can they be noticed?

If someone is playing Skyrim, we can just hope that they (or their parents/guardians) have made the informed decision that they are mature enough to handle the game and related content. While we all know this is not the case, it is the best we can do.