Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25075055-20140203153514/@comment-13446185-20140208185918

Speysider wrote: Dovahsebrom, it's not your intro, no edit on this wiki belongs to the editor and it's not up to you to decide how articles will be written here. Your lead is not a lead and just more a big description of Vivec, that is NOT what leads are meant to be for. It is clear you are biased and therefore your opinion is irrelevant here. My opinion is irrelevant? Then doesn't that make everyone's opinion irrelevant?

" a summary of its most important aspects. "

That is exactly what I have written,

if you want to make it look easier to read by splitting it into more paragraphs than be my guest but there is no point to making the lead only two sentences as that does not summarize at all. Seriousy dude I've been working on that page for months, close to everyword on it was written by me, I know what is a summary of the page and what is not.

As I said before look at wikipedia's lead to WW2 and you'll see that two sentences is not what wikipedia has in mind when they say "a summary of its most important aspects".