User blog comment:ScholarOfTheScrolls/Ulfric Stormcloak is NOT a racist./@comment-1600847-20131231000740/@comment-9062114-20131231014011

Give me an example. Stop saying you did all of these things and not explaining when. I consider an argument "refuted" when you can't come up with a viable excuse as to why it's wrong. And you have been in that position before, but instead of just admitting you may be wrong, you give ridiuclous reasons as to why it's not right. Granted, this isn't always the case, and sometimes the roles are reversed, but don't act like it never happens, because it does.

The only time you see him in-game is when he's deprived of Skooma. So no, he's not going to work with that. Here comes your extreme arrogance. Acting like you're completely right in this situation and I'm completely wrong (I've never said that about you, so don't try and pull that on me). I CAN admit when I'm wrong. For example, I used to have the argument that the Argonians can't live in the city because there isn't enough room, but I stopped using it when someone explained the "gameplay doesn't equal lore" ideas to me. You admit one thing about the Stormcloak but argue to outragously long leangths for everything else about them.