Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1738746-20150714113923/@comment-4564061-20150721045437

I'm comfortable with the proposed changes. I appreciate the feedback on my observation re: the distinction between in-game trivia (i.e. Notes) and external trivia. I honestly did not mention it to induce a change but merely mentioned it as a possible distinction between the two types of trivia. In-game trivia can be referenced easily enough because it is based on in-game books, loading screens and character dialog, as well as the wealth of lore written by the developers. External trivia is the type of points that would need some references to show the possibility of a connection. The phrasing of a point of trivia is an excellent way of showing possible connections. Use of the phrase "may be" and "could be" instead of "is" and "are" would go a long way in showing what is fact and what is speculation.