Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24.119.198.177-20130930002431/@comment-86.21.101.169-20141108224917

An overrated character says some ambiguous things he could have watched and everyone loses their minds assuming he's the player character from Oblivion and takes it as "canon" even though there's no real canon in Elder Scrolls games.

When you hear of the Nerevarine in Skyrim, all that's mentioned is that he was a male but the game doesn't go onto mention how he was a vampire werewolf hybrid and a murderer (but hero too) who became the leader of every guild and solved every problem in Morrowind before killing every living thing on the island including every NPC (which contradicts facts such as the fact that St.Jiub was responsible for killing most of the Cliff-racers...oh and also that the whole of Vvardenfell still had living creatures and people on it post-Morrowind so we can't assume that every action thinkable and doable by the player is canon).

Sheo's comments strike me simply as a past reference to Oblivion just as the Dragonborn DLC goes on to reference Morrowind. It's fan-service, nothing more, in both cases.

This article should be written from the main quest perceptive only just as the Nerevarine's article is since everything else is optional. Unless a TES game was to explicitly state a protagonist did everything then stuff like this should be written in a speculation/optional section.

This article is written with the idea that the hero did everything there was to do and became a master of every ability and the head of every guild which simply reads like a joke.