Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-3225355-20150107041151/@comment-1600847-20150108152743

ShawnHowellsCP wrote: That is actually one of the stupidest things I've heard in a very long time. Daggerfall is canon, in a sense, with over 3/4ths of it's content being non-canon or ignored.

No TES games ignore previously established lore without giving a direct reason. (Cyrodill & CHIM Forests as an example).

And no, a publisher/developer does not need to comment on every non-canon thing. ESO was created and made as a separate idea, not part of the bunch. It was never meant to fit in at all, and that is easily seeable in all of it's content. And I disagree with that. I consider ESO canon, simply because Bethesda worked with ZOS to ensure accuracy. If it wasn't going to be canon, why would they bother helping with the game?

I guarantee you when TES VI comes out, we'll see references to the events of ESO, likely in book form.