Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-28664595-20160605220956/@comment-26893431-20160606150051

Bronkiin wrote: It's not quite like that. Simply because there is no definition of canon as endorsed by Bethesda. They deliberately don't say what is and is not canon. ie. Bethesda is a political party who doesn't announce it's policies. Then again, it is very clear that Bethesda do largely agree/endorse/follow what MK says. They are still fitting it into the lore and current members (Kurt Kuhlmann) have spoken of his importance. The best policy to go by is that it is 'canon' until directly contradicted in-game. This is the same with any out of game texts, including those by current developers. That's not how it works. That's like saying ''you're guilty until proven innocent. ''It should be the other way around, it's not canon until it's directly proven ingame.