Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-4984687-20151026183820

Timeoin wrote: Just to clarify here a little bit more.

Sajuuk got banned here (again) on chat for his abusive behaviour. (I say again because this is not the first time that it has happened - and if the admins here hadn't been extremely biased towards him, it would have been done months ago) - but regardless, he was banned from chat.

Then a few hours later, a person who has NEVER been to the wiki, and made zero edits, suddenly is joining our wiki's chat, talking about the "joke" thread of Sajuuks (which, incidentally, was an official CT thread), and seems to know everything about him, and talks exactly like him.

Being slightly concerned by this, Atvelonis sends an email to Wikia via the contact, to clarify whether or not this is the same person. Wikia respond.

So you're right, everyone - we do indeed have a choice.

We can unban the person who knowingly broke the rules, who tried to avert the ban, and who hasnt learned his lesson every other time he's been banned for being abusive, and who may never do so, or we can move on with our lives, and fix the wiki.

(p.s. still waiting to hear back from Wikia regarding that block - its almost like they agree that it was a legitimate block.)

I find that most people were discussing an issue with little context before this reply. I just have some more questions:


 * What did Sajuuk say that was considered abusive?
 * What was the presumed alt used?
 * Did Wikia confirm that the IPs used were the same, or did they just presume it was a sockpuppet?
 * Would the 1 year ban be considered correct and justified or too long and harsh?