The Elder Scrolls Wiki talk:Chat Moderators/Archive 3

April 2014
{| class="collapsible collapsed" width="100%" style="border:2px solid white; background:#000000; -moz-border-radius:12px;" !

ShadowThief
Of late, ShadowThief has been helpful to me helping calm down discussions and stopping inappropriate talk around the chat. She also never gets into these kind of arguments, has a good notion of the chat rules and never gave me reason to warn her. She might not have the best edits nor the most, but she has definitely proven her worth around chat, in my opinion. PLPellegrini (talk) 03:59, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

Support
As nominator. PLPellegrini (talk) 03:59, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
Has left the wiki. Also, see some recent edits the user has made before considering nominating the user. --Speysider Talk Page 17:23, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

Change of vote. Evidence provided above this comment proves that said user does not deserve a promotion. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (talk) 19:03, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

Change of vote due to the evidence above provided bye Speysider. A Manic Monitor (talk) 19:12, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

Already acts like a mod, and many users are agains this movement. If this passes you are gaining drama, not a new mod. ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 19:33, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

Her recent actions make her unsuitable for the Chat Moderator position. Flugsmith (talk) 17:25, April 20, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
Don't you need to have at least 500 edits to become a Moderator? Drakwind (talk)

Not anymore. :P Zippertrain85 (talk) 06:21, April 16, 2014 (UTC)

You'd think they would. Set an example and all. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (You've got mail!)
 * That was discussed in this thread, and most people thought the edit requirement was unnecessary. 23:51, April 17, 2014 (UTC)

Unsuccessful. —TombRaiser  SPEAK!  01:01, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * }

May 2014
{| class="collapsible collapsed" width="100%" style="border:2px solid white; background:#000000; -moz-border-radius:12px;" !

ShawnHowellsCP
Shawn has been extremely active in the chat, is a very well known user around there and is used to the policy guides of the chat. Shawn is also on when most Mods can't. Lately, he's decided to change his behaviour, acting more friendly to other users and toning down a lot of the arguments he used to make. I believe he's fit to the position.

PLPellegrini (talk) 16:33, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Support
Shawn has grown to be responsible, and he really cares for the chat and the people in it. He would be great for a leadership position in our community. Skyrim Baby (talk) 00:08, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I agree what everyone says. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 00:01, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

As nominator. PLPellegrini (talk) 16:33, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Because of reasons mentioned by PLP Heisendalf the Skooma Wizard (talk) 16:37, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Reasons mentioned above. Mannimarco King of Worms (talk) 16:39, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

As stated, also an awesome guy when you get to know him! :D --Speysider Talk Page 16:40, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

As stated above. (EmperorJohnson (talk) 16:45, May 15, 2014 (UTC))

I have seen him on the chat often, when he is there he is usually following and enforcing the rules. He might have had some issues in the past, but he seems to be improving his attitude extremely. :) Zippertrain85 (talk) 16:47, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

He is nice and friendly, abides the laws, and I've never seen him do anything harmful. He would make an excellent mod. DivineTedrius (talk) 17:01, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Reasons stated above Veteran Legionary  "legio patria nostra"  17:08, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

The stuff the other guys said. MoS(Annoy me. Do it.)(Become a Stalker Today!) 17:25, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

He said he would improve, and I've seen some improvement yesterday. NukaTurtle (talk) 18:14, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

All reasons stated above. HolyWyvern (talk) 18:56, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Might be a tad rude, sometimes, but showed willingness to work on it. Knowledgeable about lore. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (talk) 21:26, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

All reasons above Legacyofhades (talk) 20:41, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Overall welcoming and friendly, and definitely all other reasons stated above. MisterSir (talk) 21:04, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Reasons stated above. — Profile/Talk 21:34, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

all of the reasons above --Heroesyatta (talk) 19:11, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

PLP bears good points --Tech21101 (talk) 22:46, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

Reasons stated above

Aye aye, capn. I return from the realm of the dead to support thy nomination, as I did with PLP. Satan be with ye! 23:16, May 15, 2014 (UTC)

I may not ge dead, but, I, too, support him. Sorry it took me so long to get online. Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 07:02, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

The community seems to be behind him might as well be too. Crazy131 (talk) 23:05, May 16, 2014 (UTC)

For reasons already stated :). Flugsmith (talk) 20:54, May 17, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
I personally don't feel that he's the right man for the job as he can be extreamly rude at times. Drakwind (talk) 19:15, May 21, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
Whoops, sorry. 135.19.47.8 was me. Forgot to sign in. :P \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (talk) 20:22, May 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * With all these support votes, the voting might as well close now, it's obvious Shawn will become a chat mod :D --Speysider Talk Page 11:47, May 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * Is it just me or does Shawn have the most supports out of anyone ever on the wiki? O_O Heisendalf the Skooma Wizard (talk) 15:53, May 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * He does. Even more than PLP. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (Break the silence)


 * I have promoted Shawn, but I am leaving the voting process open for a bit longer, to see how many votes we can get. Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 11:32, May 18, 2014 (UTC)

Lab Coat Billy
I am here to nominate LabCoatBilly, or LCB, as chat moderator. He is the perfect outline of a chat mod, and I think he could even surpass half the chat mods we have. Billy knows each rule, and follows them strictly. He gets along with all users, and some on a personal level. In all of his time here, he has never been banned, and has only been kicked twice (One from a trigger happy mod who is no longer a mod, one from myself for lyrics). He has never once directly insulted a user, and knows when things need to stop. He is the literal perfect outline of any moderator we could ever hope to get, and I am asking you all to help us get it. He would be lucky to be one, but we would be more lucky to have him. ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 17:08, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Support
He's always online and is respectful/respectable. When I was just a starting out little newb in our chat community, Bill made me feel welcome and taught me stuff about the site. He's pretty neat. Skyrim Baby (talk) 04:07, May 26, 2014 (UTC) as nominator ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 17:10, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

I have seen him act very well on the chat, and he uses diplomacy to try and calm down trolls, I think he could do good with this :) Zippertrain85 (talk) 17:10, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

I fully support this nomination. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 17:12, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Mature, friendly, helpfull, just give him the badge already. ;) Heisendalf the Skooma Wizard (talk) 17:18, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Billy definitely knows lore, respects all equally and never broke the rules once. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (I thought I told you to keep quiet?)

For all reasons stated above. The demented Breton (talk) 21:05, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Reasons stated above Tech21101 (talk) 03:42, May 24, 2014 (UTC)

You can't argue with Sean Bean, he's the perfect guy for this job! Let's just hope he doesn't die though. Fishy (talk) 22:37, May 25, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
I just don't think LCB is the right man for the job. He just seems too immature for the role. Mannimarco King of Worms (talk) 04:16, May 26, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
I don't remember kicking Billy once, though. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (I thought I told you to keep quiet?)

Zippertrain85
I acknowledge the fact that Zipper has had an...incident that made him lose his forum moderator responsibilities. I am here to nominate him for chat mod as I believed he still exhibits qualities that just cannot be allowed to go to waste, and therefore, I think he is suitable for being a chat moderator. Firstly, he frequents the chat, Second, he enforces the chat rules well and lastly, he is moderator material and can display a cool attitude when the chat is heating up.

Support
As nominator ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC  Say Hi! stalk edits 17:09, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

I am trusting he will be as good as last time, but without the ending ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 17:11, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Owen and Shawn, sometimes I even forget that he's not a mod anymore, we all mess up, it's a part of human nature, I think Zip deserves a 2nd chance at least in being a chat mod because as said before, it's a bit of a waste not having him as one. Heisendalf the Skooma Wizard (talk) 17:17, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

For knowing the rules, being diplomatic, keeping a level head, and being a prime example of a chat moderator in general. Lab Coat Billy (talk) 17:32, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Zipper performed admirably as a Forum Moderator and always kept a vigilant eye on the chat. Humans learn from their mistakes, and Zipper is no different than any of us in this regard. I say allow him to redeem himself. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (I thought I told you to keep quiet?)

Agreed with everything said above. Crazy131 (talk) 19:14, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

All of the above + he's on at times where other mods aren't. NukaTurtle (talk) 20:12, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

All reasons stated above. Very helpful. The demented Breton (talk) 21:06, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Reasons stated above Tech21101 (talk) 03:49, May 24, 2014 (UTC)

He's a'ight. Skyrim Baby (talk) 04:21, May 26, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

 * }

June 2014
{| class="collapsible collapsed" width="100%" style="border:2px solid white; background:#000000; -moz-border-radius:12px;" !

Rights Removal: Jett Cyber
I am making this topic to discuss the removal of chat moderator rights for user "Jett Cyber". Despite previous claims, this user does not go into chat and the last usage of the user's abilities was an abuse of the position (kicking someone by request). The contributions by the user indicate very sporadic activity on the site and most of which are posts in off-topic / roleplaying threads. Please use the voting templates as normal in the appropriate headers.

Support
- As requestor. --Speysider Talk Page 17:49, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

He has been on chat under 5 times. Not since I became mod. Since I joined the wiki. About 5 months I believe. Maybe 6 or 7.

ADDED NOTE: Not only have I completely sided with this vote, but in light of Scholar's picture, I think Jett should have never gotten power. He is, for lack of a better or more civilized term, sludge. Solitude Guard (talk) 16:59, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Was extremely corrupt during the time in which he was actually active, and has been inactive for 6 months now. During my time here, I've probably seen him come online only 3 times. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 18:12, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Wow. I seriously cannot believe why he isn't de modded yet, he is very inactive. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 18:55, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

I forgot he even existed. He was inactive for several months and almost never moderated appropriately. I'm only surprised his rights haven't already been removed. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ ( Awaken the somneling demon )

Doesn't act like a Chat Mod when he is on the chat, and only really used his rights when he abused his power. Needs to go. Zippertrain85 (talk) 21:12, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

No offense Jett, but there's no point in having a mod who doesn't even get on the chat. There are plenty of active users who fit the qualifications, so why give the star to somebody who is inactive and barely meets the requirements? Likes-That-Tail (talk) 03:29, June 14, 2014 (UTC)

I've seen this guy quite a lot....In the chat moderator semi-active section, as for the chat itself, not at all. Sera Scholy of House Telvanni (talk) 03:56, June 14, 2014 (UTC)

Jett should of never got the position of chat moderator, mainly because of bigotry. Him being inactive and some of his rude insults to people should of got him demoted in the reevaluation. EmperorJohnson (talk) 16:25, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

I have barely seen him on chat, and even then he never did anything. 17:10, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Inactive in chat, is immature as seen in Scholar's comment, and has previously caused disruption when actually in chat. ゆ (talk) 17:14, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Jett Cyber's lie about his broken computer is, excuse my French, the biggest fucking bullshit lie I've ever seen in my scum-ridden life. Not only has he RPed on one of his threads, he has continued to play the Browser-Based game NationStates for the duration of his 'Computer repairs', which shouldn't last that long anyway. Not only this, but the picture Scholar linked is just a brush cleaning his destroyed debate off the payment after the rubbish bin tipped over. Signed, MoS(Annoy me. Do it.)(Become a Stalker Today!) 17:21, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
Professional debater eh? Well why don't you debate your way out of this? What's up with you going around like a Jehovah Witness preaching how athiests will "go to hell" like in this: http://postimg.org/image/h288f27gv/? Sera Scholy of House Telvanni (talk) 13:12, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * Those comments should really result in Jett being banned for bringing the chat mods into disrepute and for spreading religious hate: if so, it should be for a long time. --Speysider Talk Page 17:24, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Rights removed per consensus - 19:26, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * }