Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4544033-20160207013932/@comment-10789912-20160208060300

Shockstorm wrote: Bronkiin wrote: tldr

I didn't know that the above was being suggested, and I assumed my pms to you were private anyways.

I trusted you, and tried to be nice to you.

But yeah, screw that, I guess.

Anyways, I'm out. I couldn't care less at this point. Shockstorm, I don't like the new system either (hence me voting against it; what you're supposed to do when you're against something) but how about instead of throwing a pissy fit, we wait and see this out. If those that are part of this system do not know the rules (your fear) or it is proven unnecessary, you and I can write a CT on it, and allow the community to decide based on a well formatted response and counter-argument.

Quitting from your position because of something this petty is asinine. Hell, it's not even a make-or-break situation for the wiki. If this fails, no mentionable damage is done to the wiki at all. It's just one failed system that we'll replace with something else in that scenario.

Whilst this isn't a job, the mainspace is supposed to be a place of professionalism. This isn't a business, it's a community project. What is happening now is a normal part of community projects- testing and seeing what better suits it. As I've stated, worst case scenario, I'll write a response with as large as a counter-argument as any other CT I've written. Thing about counter-arguments, is that you need something to strongly debate against. This is why you have to see if this system works well, or fails horribly. One side, we keep it and the wiki improves. The other side, we replace it and the wiki improves.

So, in short, stop acting like you're entitled to stand vigilantly against a system that was created because of your (among others) ignorance towards voting on those pages, and that we haven't even given a chance to breath yet.