Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-26213507-20150715194939/@comment-26356342-20150723205242

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THE IRONY OF IT ALL! I like that ym off-hand comment about the forsworn seems to have sparked such debate, and I was content to sit and watch it all unfold from the sidelines here but then I come accross this;

''- "um the Forsworn are savages. U don't think the Nords would have given them some land if they stop sacrifces, cannibalism, mass murder, hagraven transformations, hagraven worship and all that odd practice? Even the Dark Elfs don't do those kinds of suff and if they do they go into hiding or just get killed." -''

It's hard to argue you believe in religious freedom and then claim someone else doing the EXACT same thing is a savage, with odd practices. Are you aware that Bosmer are cannibals? Ever hear of the green pact? The forsworn also ruled Markarth without violance, totally fine, save for a few of the more prideful Nords.

If what you're saying is, that if the forsworn would be willing to give up their religion, in exchange for land, and to be left alone I will point you to the Empire who is asking the Nords give up Talos (FOR THE TIME BEING) in exchange to not be hassled by Thalmor.