Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-10789912-20151024212511

Do to the lack of evidence for it being an alt, and the fact the most vigilant user for the ban refuses to make a single point and simply acts out of bias, I'm going to say no. The ban was not justified. Evidence is going both ways, and choosing one side without complete evidence is pathetic, and favoritism for one result.

I say revert the punishment back to the original 2 week/1 month ban it was intended to be, because there isn't any evidence saying we shouldn't.