Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1738746-20150714113923/@comment-5824038-20150720091912

So far, then, we have come up with these ideas: some kind of tag, similar to the bugs sections tags, to show people that a point is unconfirmed; referencing must always be included, for example for a visual similarity a picture of what the in-game item of discussion is similar to; proofreading of other articles as a long-term project to remove trivia points that go against the rules; and keeping a careful eye on what is being added, to make sure it doesn't go against the rules.

Anything else I haven't mentioned?

(I know the last 2 aren't really things that need to be added to the policy, but they are still important.)