Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-95.94.124.138-20130922100323/@comment-1470368-20140708222737

Dovahsebrom wrote: Ifnsman wrote:

I'm still not counting the PGE 1st Edition as any bit trustworthy, despite some of the interesting things to be found within.

What's to be considered canon lore as far as the Pocket Guides are concerned is left up to MK to decide.

(Edit): As far as I know, however, MK seems to have been a little kinder toward the 3rd Edition. The Pocket Guides are definitely canon, they are just severely biased (if every bias book in TES wasn't canon then there wouldn't be such a thing as TES lore).

I don't think Kirkbride wrote the PGE 3. Compared to every other official piece of Lore written for the series?

Still untrustworthy propaganda (explicitly to be discounted).