Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140825123912/@comment-26474238-20140828213506

Dire Skeever wrote: GarouxBloodline wrote: He has been globally banned. But for lesser vandalism, we already take care of it: that is why we have patrollers with the rollback tools to remove vandalism, and the Vandalism Reports page to alert administrators to ban those same vandals. When, on average, we are shown to only ban 1-3 vandals a day, then our rights holders are easily equipped to handle that. The original post, as well as other posts in this tread, all suggest that the current system and methods are no longer enough. (If the current measures were sufficient, I doubt this thread would even exist.)

CCC, of the list you have provided, I still think the first option is the best...even after considering all of the posts that oppose it. It's clearly not the best or most popular choice (nothing ever will be), but it is still the fastest, easiest, and most effective.

Anyway. This discussion was fun, but I've got nothing new to add. (And I'd rather be playing Oblivion.)  Have a good afternoon everyone. Just because someone personally perceives a problem, does not mean that the problem exists - that would be circular logic. The numbers I provided, along with the links, shows us that the problem does not actually exist, and there is nothing contradicting that evidence.

And thank you for your opinions. :) I might not agree with them, but at least you were civil in presenting them, and that is always appreciated.