Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150326212135/@comment-1738746-20150327165749

Building on what others have said, I do want to highlight that in the original CT, I did add that even points of speculative nature needed to be referenced. For example, in the trivia section of the Dwarven Sword, I had added a point that highlighted the similarities in design between said sword and old Roman Gladiator swords, and in the same line, linked out to an image of one so people could see the similarity for themselves and see where I was coming from. That's the type of referencing I mean- linking out to the place you got the information on the thing you think resembles the TES thing, so people know you've done your research on this. I do think if this policy gets changed, this referencing note needs to be added because otherwise it's a free-riegn for people to post BS and that wasn't my intention with this change in policy.

Also keep in mind, something else I mentioned in the original CT, unconfirmed information isn't necessarily incorrect information :)