Board Thread:Skyrim/@comment-12599067-20130928060857/@comment-7953253-20131003072346

Twigman55 wrote:

Lord Hadron wrote:

Twigman55 wrote: This thread has gone from it's oringinal purpose but either way, I think that the Nords do have the right to kill them. They have killed many men, women, and have kidnapped children. The nords were oly trying to protect themselves from these invaders, but that doesn't mean the reachmen had to go berserk and go on a massacre. For instance the Empire lost the war, but they dont go around killing innocent elves for no reason. Are you serious? Nords are only trying to protect themselves from these invaders?

WHAT the Actual F**k? If anyone is an invader, it's the Nords.

The Reachmen didn't invade on an already inhabited Reach, inhabited by Nords.

The Reach was conrols by the Nords FIRST you may deny the fact but I think someone earler in th thread explained that. The Reach settled it after the Nords Empire broke apart but the they retoook it later. So as you can see the Forsworn are the invaders not the Nords the nords are technically the native reachmen. Doesn't matter who were there first. You know why? Because THESE GUYS were already in the Reach BEFORE the Nords, so you can't keep using the "Nords set foot in the Reach during the Jargon Wars, oh why look at this building or this or even THIS building" and use this as an excuse for calling the Reachmen the invaders. Why do you think the native Bretons are named Reachmen? The bretons (Reachmen) were living in the Reach until this asswipe killed them all off when he united all Tamriel.

Just look at Markarth itself. CLEARLY Dwarven architecture. You think the Nords lived peacefully side by side with the Dwemer while they built the city and even Nchuand-Zel?