Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26896471-20151004010902/@comment-1251315-20151010182702

In response to Bronkiin's question: I personally think that quantity is far more important for the Moot. The more people who are involved, the more opinions that can be gathered. The moot is not a selective banding of just users who are in the USA, that is unfair and locks out a massive portion of the community.

Quality is important yes, but for the moot, I don't agree that the "quality" is more important than the "quantity". If the moot policy was followed (as laid out on Project:Moot), then there shouldn't be an issue, but as it stands, I've been told that moot leaders don't even exist now because it's just the sysops doing all that stuff, simply because it's mostly the same people over and over. If more users who "weren't" regulars joined the moot, then moot leaders would become more of a necessity.