Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-79.70.65.54-20130609192139/@comment-10445076-20130611074149

Erik Torvaldson wrote: Honestly the Dragonborne should be High King, Dragonborne as in what they show it as in lore. The Dragonborne is usually a male Nord, though I've seen a couple female Nord dragonborne, but Nord none the less. I get why its not possible in game, but lore wise it makes the most sense. All Ulfric did was throw a fit while the Empire was rebuilding after the lore, bet you anything if the Empire was at full strength he would have kept his mouth shut. I liked him at first, but after awhile it became all to obvious that he was nothing more than a power-hungry prick, who really doesnt give a shit about you if you aren't a Nord. Elisif is a good person, but shes much to naive and inexperienced to rule all of Skyrim, the Empire would easily make her their unintentional puppet. Balgruuf is good, i like Balgruuf, but he sided with the Empire -just- to spite Ulfric. He hates the Thalmor, he worships Talos, he clearly does not want to follow the White Gold Concordant, and when he's given a chance to change everything for the betterment of all of Skyrim, he turns it down because he doesnt like the Jarl leading it. Someone whos supposed to run a kingdom doesnt let their personal feeling of someone effect their people's lives. Maven Black-Briar is a corrupt bitch, so thats right out. Only person i could see in lore taking the throne other than the Dragonborne is Brunwulf Free-Winter. he cares about Skyrim, and by Skyrim i mean everybody and everything living there. Not just Nords. after the war, not after the lore xDD