The Elder Scrolls Wiki talk:Chat Moderators


 * Users must be nominated into their position by an active chat moderator or chat frequent staff member. Nominations for Chat Moderator should be made here, by using the button below.

Casting a vote
Community votes should be cast using one of the following templates with a reason:

→ Write a reason for support

→ Write a reason for opposition

→ Write a reason for neutrality

→ Write a comment on the topic without voting

Voting generally lasts for 10 days, however, it may be shortened depending on number support/oppose votes.

Chat nominations are now open again, but with the re evaluations of staff, the existing chat mods will also go through the voting process. New nominations are welcome.

Please give your reasoning for the vote you cast. without it, it will not be counted.

Likes-That-Tail
Existing chat mod 21:07, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Support
Shille Talk Page 22:02, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

I really don't care if people don't like him or not to be honest, while I don't agree with him on many issues (*cough*Spey*cough*) I also don't believe he's corrupt either, he's one of our most active and dedicated mods and we all know there's not many of them around anymore. --&#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; &#34;Get Vehkt M8&#34; -CHIM Shady &#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; (talk) 22:12, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Tails is an exceptional moderator. One of the best ones I've ever seen, in fact. If I was a single girl, and if I had to pick between Shawn, Tails and other previous chat mods, I'd pick tails. He has mein vote! HolyWyvern (talk) 22:25, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

He is young and learning. He admits when he has wronged. He takes care of issues that rise in chat and he keeps a level head.  revolveGirl God's Army 22:27, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Even though there have been conflicts involving LTT, he is mature and an active Chat mod. He has my support. --Greeno200 (talk) 22:42, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

LTT is very active, and has been learning very well over his period of modship. The demented Breton (talk) 23:04, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Tail is a great moderator, in my holy opinion. I see no reason for him to step down. He is diplomatic and active. DivineTedrius (talk) 23:35, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

LLT is often in the chat, and I have seen no reason not to trust him. He does his job and loves this wiki and I see no reason for him to lose his rights..-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 03:09, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

LTT has solved many a problem for me and involving me. He is very active and is a great chat mod. Harkon Romney (talk) 20:59, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
Causes just as many problems as he seems to solve, continues to have a bias against a certain user on the chat. Enforces things that doesn't even exist & that he personally doesn't like, can't take criticism against him & has shown a disregard for opinions other then his own & those who support him. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 23:51, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Shuts down every discussion he personally doesn't like and generally enforces non-existent policies. He is also a liability for private conversations anywhere (PM's, Skype, Steam etc), as he screenshots excessively and will use just about anything as evidence to get you either demoted or banned from the chat (he made so many screenshots against me that I wondered if he simply wanted to screenshot everything I said, even completely innocent things). Spoken to plenty of people who feel the same way. Sorry, I have to oppose. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:28, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

I know Tail tries very hard but there are still some issues he can't master. Until then I'm not sure he is the person for the position. 19:02, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

I was neutral until I remembered him screencapping private conversations and even Skype. I believe this is highly inappropriate, backstabbing behavior that betrays the trust of others, just for the sake of a petty grudge. This is a clear show of immaturity and bias, therefore, I change to oppose, even though people might hit back The Binary Lovecraftian Dragon (talk) 08:42, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

I agree with those above. :P — Walter White Walker  Say My Name   ''' 00:45, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral
LTT is a friend of mine, and he enforces existing rules fairly well. It's just that... well, he takes things a bit too seriously. I'm not going to go into detail, but I've gotten in trouble for things that I (and many others) view as insignificant. Nick, please don't take this as being harsh. You're a great friend, but I really don't have a stance on your chat mod status. Indylord (talk) 23:14, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Probably one of the best mods of this chat. He is a great modo and an amazing person. He deserves to keep his rights. Emperor Jarjarkine   Senate Hall  02:02, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

A good and close friend of mine, it pains me to change my vote from a support. However, I have not forgotten the Spey consensus and events of the like. To Hell With God (talk) 16:40, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Tail has just the right amount of dedication to do the job superbly, but what troubles me is his strictness. At times he'll warn people for just mentioning potentially offensive matters, when said matters weren't, at the time, evolved to the point of inadequacy. Chat is being harmed in the long term, if Tail continues to act so forbidding, in my opinion, but, as I've said, he has huge potential. 19:33, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Comment
(Not voting, since not actually really part of the active community) I think LTT is a nice, devoted person that enforces the rules when they are necessary, but can also take part in a bit more loose conversation and joke with the rest. While admittingly not perfect, I think he shows an interest in getting better as well. Sincerely, Yaell Novella (talk) 07:08, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

I have never yet seen Tail take part in anything "loose", more often than not I see such discussions being shut down by Tail himself. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:29, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

M.Owen LFC!
Existing chat mod 21:07, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Support
Shille Talk Page 22:03, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Nice guy, hasn't been on chat as much as he used to, but seems to enforce the rules and act like a Role Model when there. — Walter White Walker  Say My Name   ''' 22:38, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Owen enforces policy very well on chat. He is also not corrupt. --Greeno200 (talk) 22:42, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Fantastic chat mod. Is a personal friend of mine, helps out, and enforces rules extremely well. 23:03, September 9, 2014 --Indylord (talk) 23:09, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Owen is a great friend, and a great moderator. Without a doubt he would be more active on the chat, if he could access it, but at the moment he cannot. The demented Breton (talk) 23:15, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Owen, well, he seems like a decent chat mod who doesn't show bias and is balanced between laxity and strictness on chat the last few times I was on chat. Well, I know he can't connect to chat due to internet issues, but I still support him. Keep up the good work! The Binary Lovecraftian Dragon (talk) 01:35, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

-- Emperor Jarjarkine   Senate Hall  02:02, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Great moderator, but see his comment for reasons why he isn't around as much. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:28, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

He's a really great chat moderator, nevermind his recent inactivity. If that can get fixed he should definetly stay as a moderator. The Godly Viking 17:29, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Owen, much like Scholar, has performed his duties tightly, and I don't think his recent inactivity is enough to superimpose the work he's done. 19:43, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral
When he is able to get on chat, there are times that I see him doing things a mod shouldn't do and things a mod should do. I am neutral on him at the moment, because I have not really formed an opinion on him yet.  revolveGirl God's Army 22:29, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Owen is a good mod for the most part, & has been very helpful in the past, he has been inactive as of late which is why he isn't around often, & he can't help that so I'm neutral at this point. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 23:51, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

I would say I lean more in support, but an worried about his ability to do his job. While I have not seen him active recently in the chat, I see no real issues from him. He has said he has troubles getting into the chat, and we should give him time to fix this before we move to demote him. For now, he was given us a valid reason, and has given me no reason to doubt him.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 03:16, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

I haven't seen Owen that much in chat when I have been there and find it hard to give a vote. I see in his comment below he has issues to enter chat so that is a reason for not being active. 19:25, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Comment
Just like to state how I've been inactive as of late due to nit being able to enter the chat. Probably wikia server issues due to me living in Indonesia. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 23:17, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

ScholarOfTheScrolls
Existing chat mod 21:07, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Support
Scholar hosts a calm, respectful nature while on duty, and has stopped more fights than I have seen. No one has complained about Scholar to the point that we judged his rights at all. This, obviously, is a full blown support from me. Slay the Tyrant, the Liar, and the Whore (talk) 22:01, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Shille Talk Page 22:03, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

A great moderator, he is fairly active and handles situations properly, as well as uses his powers appropriately. topkek (talk) 23:33, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Scholar is a great mod, he is very nice to users and enforces the rules when he needs to, those qualities are actually kind of hard to find in most users. So, I think Scholie deserves it. — Walter White Walker  Say My Name   ''' 22:38, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Scholar doesn't overextend his power. He also isn't soft when it comes to enforcing policy. --Greeno200 (talk) 22:42, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Yes, yes, and yes. One of my best friends on the wiki, and overall a great chat mod. He is calm and collected, stops fights, is respectful, etc. I sincerely hope he retains his moderator position. Indylord (talk) 23:16, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Strongly support. He is a great example of a good moderator; a professional at keeping the chat under control using diplomacy, really active despite real life duties, and knows when to do what with his powers. If there's one person that should stay as a chat moderator, it's him. DivineTedrius (talk) 23:44, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Scholar is a good mod, he remains active & enforces policy. A few say he might be a little to trigger happy, but overall I think he does well & him having the chat moderator tools benefits the chat. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 23:51, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Scholar is the only currently active mod I've seen so far to be able to adapt to the changing chat conditions so that everyone's chat needs can be fulfilled. Full support for you, Scholie! The Binary Lovecraftian Dragon (talk) 01:37, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

--- Emperor Jarjarkine   Senate Hall  02:07, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

While we may not always agree, he has shown respect for his job and does it well. I see no reason to oppose him.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 04:05, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

He's a good moderator, respects the tools and the opinions of others. There is no reason to oppose, unless you have personal bias against him (looking at Wyvern's rather dubious oppose vote). --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:28, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Scholar has performed perfectly as a mod when I have been present. I have no doubt in his decisions. 19:25, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Decent and does his job.  revolveGirl God's Army 22:38, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Scholar has prevented the chat from descending into chaos many times now, as he's always there to combat lollygagging rule-breaking, be it spam, trolling, or a debate gone south. 19:37, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
— I have my reasons of opposition. Me and Scholar had a rivalry since he started to threaten to ban me from the chat. I knew he was kidding, but these things offend me. So that's why I oppose him of being a Chat Mod. HolyWyvern (talk) 22:23, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

I have nothing against the guy, but he only seems to enforce chat rules when he feels like it, never to his friends, and takes advantage of the vaguely worded rules of chat, to do what he wants when he decides to. --Flamedude22 18:58, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Knight of Camlorn
Existing chat mod 17:04, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Support
I have seen him on the skyrim chat a couple time and it seems to me that he does a very good job and would make a very good moderator. --Cpt.Zod (talk) 19:11, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

While I agree that he hasn't really moderated much, he doesn't get much chance to do so. He was originally on the news team and I think we should give him the chance to actually moderate the chat. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 19:19, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

KOC is a good guy, & does care about things on this wiki, he may not always be around but that isn't part of his duty though, & while this is about his Chat Mod status, I do think he does well in enforcing rules when he is around. & I don't see him causing problems or any reason why he shouldn't have said tools to help moderate the chat. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 19:26, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
The times I have seen him on I have never seen him do his job. Do I specifically look to see if he is doing his job, no. If he can prove that he can be great mod material, I will change my vote. Until then, I will oppose him.  revolveGirl God's Army 18:54, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Knight is a great guy to talk to, but, to be frank, I don't remember him performing the duties. If the job is not being done, the tools to do said job are not needed. 19:38, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

He only comes on the chat for about once a month, stays in the chat for a week, complains about some game he's playing currently and goes on a hiatus again. This is what I've seen from my expreice with KoC in the chat, he never uses his tools nor enforce any rules. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 22:57, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Comment
@Owen: I've seen Camlorn in the chat quite regularly, at least once a day, internet allowing. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:49, September 12, 2014 (UTC)


 * Was that this week? Watch go on hiatus the next, unless of course he's reading this and decides to stall this hiatus. Pardon my cynicism. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC  Say Hi! stalk edits 11:47, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

Indylord
[I think everyone knows that 3 chat moderators is definitely not enough to moderate a chat that usually capcacitates around 15+ people at peak hours. Indy has been in the chat since 2013 and knows the people of the chat rather well. He can act serious when needed and I think he does have a sense of judgment and can display a cool head when under pressure.]

Support
As nominator. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 23:36, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Indy can be a good mod over time, A little training from the veteran mods and he can be some what great at this. He is very active at the chat and that is what we need, I support Indy in being Mod SickRogue (talk) 00:22, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Indy is a mature, kind, caring user who has corrected many arguments in chat. Be it the PLP incident, or the multiple behind-the-scenes helpings, I feel as if Indy is fully prepared to take on the title of chat moderator. I'm willing to put my name on the line as much as I possibly can to support. This is my well educated choice. Slay the Tyrant, the Liar, and the Whore (talk) 01:11, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
Not active enough, only 24 edits on the wiki, doesn't stop situations in chat really, hasn't ever shown me any reason for him having the tools. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 23:51, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Indy hasn't been as active as he used to be, but even more I have not really seen him deal with situations or people in need of help enough times, of course this does not mean he cannot work towards improving himself, he is friendly enough, and let's not forget he brought the light on the PLP situation. Indy you have potential but you just need to apply yourself a bit more, you should try come on more, try to help out more, try to calm heated situations more. If you work on those I will one day reconsider. --&#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; &#34;Get Vehkt M8&#34; -CHIM Shady &#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; (talk) 00:13, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

I would be happy to support Indy, the only problem is he only has 24 edits. I know having more edits isn't a requirement to become a Chat mod, however that is still a pretty low amount considering he might be on the Elder Scrolls wiki staff. If he starts editing the wiki more, I will support him fully. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:04, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

-I do not recall ever even seeing Indy in chat, and his edit count seems rather low. I don't want to oppose somebody over an edit count, but I see very little activity from him in general. I'm sorry.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 03:20, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral
Indy has potential to be good for the chat, but his activity has been kind of becoming less & less frequent as of late. — Walter White Walker  Say My Name   ''' 23:42, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

I've got to be honest. I like Indy. He is really nice and an active user, but I am sceptical to him as a mod. Other than what I said, he hasn't really done anything that's really convincing for me, although if I see anything, I'll change my vote. DivineTedrius (talk) 23:55, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

I would like to see him come around more and more before I say yay or nay.  revolveGirl God's Army 23:56, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

He's a nice guy, but hasn't really contributed enough to the wiki. If he were to contribute to improving the wiki and reach, say, 100 edits, I might be willing to support, but right now I can neither oppose, nor support. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:28, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Changing my vote to neutral as Indy isn't enough active yet. And editcounts doesn't count. It only says "You must be familiar with the wiki's editing policies and practices." 19:25, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Indy has great potential, he knows the guidelines and has just the right mindset for the position. I just need to see him performing mod tasks. 19:39, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
Thank you guys for all the advice. I can't believe I was nominated, anyway! To the people talking about my edit count; aiming for chat mod, not patroller. It's a little unfair to judge me based on my edits, but I'll try to contribute a lot more; Again, thank you for being awesome. Indylord (talk) 12:31, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Miraak Obama
Miraak Obama is an active me member of the chat and knows the people of it well. He has managed to sniff out a few Jigsaw alts by reporting to us mods in PM's and is overall, a friendly and mature member of the chat. Although nice never seem him act under pressure but I am certain Miraak can become a great Chat mod in a time where we desperately need more chat mods.

Support
As nominator. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 23:40, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Yes, Miraak is a great user, and a cool guy, who I think would make a decent Mod, in addition, we could really use more users moderating the chat. Considering how little Mods we have left! :) — Walter White Walker  Say My Name   ''' 23:42, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Miraak Obama is in my eyes, well suited for this position. He obeys the rules very well, is very nice to others, and active a lot, even though we're in two completely different timezones, he is on almost always when I am. DivineTedrius (talk) 23:49, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Knows when to be serious and knows when he can joke about. He doesn't show any kind of resentment towards other.

I do agree with Ghost Anubis.  revolveGirl God's Army 00:01, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Is a great user, a great friend, and overall great chat mod material. Indylord (talk) 00:07, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

He hosts the same potential Billy did. The perfect user. Well liked by everyone, no enemies, respected, funny but always follows all chat rules, and has stopped fights. What more do we need from any user? This is the sculpting of someone I would one day trust the entire wiki in. Slay the Tyrant, the Liar, and the Whore (talk) 01:14, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

A chance for you to prove yourself, Miraak. I'd like to see how chat might be moderated under your care, especially since you are on at the hours no one is on. The Binary Lovecraftian Dragon (talk) 01:41, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Mobama is active, helpful and an overall chilled out guy. --&#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; &#34;Get Vehkt M8&#34; -CHIM Shady &#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; (talk) 01:46, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

-I have good relations with him and he is a zen guy. I think i would like to see what he can do as a mod.-- Emperor Jarjarkine   Senate Hall  02:06, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Miraak is a friendly and helpful person on chat, he is a good influence. It also helps that he has over 10,000 edits. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:22, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

He's a great dude and I'd think he'd make a good chat moderator. However, as Ghost has pointed out, he does post a lot in RP's: it may be better if he branched out to other parts of the site to contribute. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:28, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Just cause he's by BFF, just kidding. He is a well liked guy who visits the chat often and hasn't really pushed anyone's buttons... yet. Harkon Romney (talk) 21:07, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Miraak definetely knows how the chat's machine should be oiled, and he also has no problems dealing with other users. He has my vote for this election ;) 19:46, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
In all fairness, I would rather him be a forum mod then just a chat mod. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 23:51, September 9, 2014 (UTC)

Of what I've heard, Miraak has some problems being here much, and would in that case be more suitable as a forum mod. 19:25, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

I have heard about the Forum mod's rights being reconsidered, and having more power over the forum board. If so, I would rather wait for those to be implimented and/or decided on before ever being nominated for that position.

EDIT: Reworded

topkek (talk) 20:17, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

DivineTedrius
DivineTedrius is undeniably one of our most active and helpful users here. He's usually the first to jump into action when a new user asks for help and alongside that he also tries to calm situations to the best of his abilities without getting too heated. He has all the qualities that a mod should have and quite frankly I think he's wasted without that star, especially with how little in number the mods are at the present. --&#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; &#34;Get Vehkt M8&#34; -CHIM Shady &#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; (talk) 00:23, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Just a little example of Tedrius in action: []

Support
Agree with everything said above Starkiller131 (talk) 00:26, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

As nominator &#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; &#34;Get Vehkt M8&#34; -CHIM Shady &#91;̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅&#93; (talk) 00:28, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Divine is a FANTASTIC user, and has actually tried to calm down situations in the chat recently, I think he could do well with the tools that come with the position. Also, with our lack of mods, it would be cool to bring them up again with someone who really deserves it. — Walter White Walker  Say My Name   ''' 00:30, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Divine is a great user, as well as friend. He is friendly, active, and never hesitates to help when someone needs it. topkek (talk) 00:31, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

I do think that DT would make an effective Chat Moderator & making him one would benefit the chat. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 00:51, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Tedrius is a good person to have around the wiki. I think he will fit right in as a Chat mod. --Greeno200 (talk) 02:22, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Decent, level minded, frequents chat, and friendly.  revolveGirl God's Army 03:41, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Has tried to help mods and succesfully done it from time to time. I beleive he can maintain a cool head to some extent and is a friendly user with potential to take up this post. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 07:19, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

Is a great person, would make a good moderator and has helped out other moderators when necessary. You have my support! --SuperSajuuk Talk Page 08:28, September 10, 2014 (UTC)

We need him as a chat mod now, as my previous comment was proven false by observations. He stays on chat a really long time, so support.--The Binary Lovecraftian Dragon (talk) 08:47, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

He has always been helpful and nice whenever i'm asking questions. --Anor Londo (talk) 15:51, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Divine nows the guidelines, burns villages, has the right behavior and is an overall great guy. I do think benefits will come from having him able to provide monitoring, specially since he's so active. 19:46, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
I don't know Teddy that much so I can't cast any vote on him. 19:25, September 10, 2014 (UTC)