Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-11276487-20130729162631/@comment-25340654-20150131211833

JimboBumbag wrote:

ViVe wrote:

JimboBumbag wrote:

ViVe wrote:

58.7.145.230 wrote: DEATH!!! DEATH!!!

Murder (NO MATTER WHAT): Death!

Stealing (NO MATTER WHAT): Death!

Trespass (NO MATTER WHAT): Death!

Other crimes (NO MATTER WHAT): Death!

Yes it is unfair, the little crimes get the same punishment as the big crimes. If only there was something worse than death. Sounds like the United States... Not at all actually. The fact that the idea of the death penalty is still considered controversial in some aspects in the US is proof of that. As for animals, well, some of them have to be killed in the natural order of life, because we have to eat, and I don't think you can force our entire population to become vegan or something. I highly doubt animals really care for our lives at all with the exception of dogs and cats that grew bonds with us. In the European Union it's forbidden for the countries to use death penalties. So on I don't see your point that it's perfect to kill someone for commiting a crime even if it's a murderer. The biggest problem of execution remains: After all the excecuted man was unguilty. Well, he's death and it can't be undone. And I can remember that the American media blamed the Belgian goverment for their euthanasia law, wich is a free choice for every citizen. And animals doesn't really care about our lives as dogs and cats do because we don't really grow with them. A dog may go in our house and they see us nearly everyday but who want to spent their days playing witg pigs? Yeah, as far as nature goes, we're supposed to kill animals anyway and for the death penalty, truthfully I highly doubt being in prison for the rest of your life would be much better. Answer's pretty obvious here. We should go to another topic. Ofcourse killing animals is justified for food. I mean as long as we keep the race standing and keep their lives a bit decent. But I'm trying to use the Socratic method. Now my question is: Murdering someone is a crime, so on isn't the headsman also a muderer? And the reason I took the euthanasian law from Belgium? because every Belgian senator is called psychopath, assasin and madman. Then I ask you: Why is it wrong to give someone the option to commite a peaceful suicide and why is it justified for the goverment to execute their prisoners in America? I can't understand such a thing even in Skyrim nor in our modern world.But we will still justify this because in our own world this happens also. Therefor it feels a bit more correct. Ofcourse now they guys who says that you can't compare our world with their world wants their statisfaction. But their systems and ideas are quite normal. The marriage of the commen folks are  mostly for the love and not for keeping grounds together, and the social system isn't deternimated on birthright. Also the indivudual education of each citizen is quite high.