Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-30011802-20170217032502/@comment-26893431-20170328211631

Terawolf119 wrote: Blademaster Jauffre wrote:

Terawolf119 wrote: 1. Yes, but one source isn't very evident is it?

2 Ya, but what about now, they might be as weak as the Empire.

3. Yes, but skyrim being destroyed by them would weaken them enough to be beaten by the empire, especially since its likely that the next game has to do with an argoirain rebelion.

4. Exactly theres sources that there were spies so it is likely there is more. just likely there is one random soure that your son is alive, and there is no source of him dieing therefore hes likely alive.

5. Well not many people only have 2 fingers, the average is 5, therefore it is likely he has 5, then only 2.

6. Becuase whos going to be there to clean up the mess? The left over neutral places, therefore deciding Tamriels fate depending on whos left. 1. Looking at the person who says it, it is very evident. The second-in-command who also just happens to be the recruitor of the Stormcloaks, has no reason to lie. Ulfric's the symbol of the rebellion, but Galmar handles the details.

2. Might be, but even then, they'd still be stronger than the Stormcloaks. Since the Legions the Stormcloaks are fighting is nothing in comparison to a normal Legion. And over half of these normal Legions had a hard time halting the Dominion.

3. Prove it. The Empire would need to fight on two fronts, there's no way that'd turn out succesful.

4. There are sources about specific spies on specific people or in specific locations. The ones that are mentioned are seen ingame, there's no mention of any other spies, there is mention of that "son", there is no mention of "additional spies".

5. Likely, speculation, therefor, not factual. Many people lose fingers.

6. The Empire defeating the Dominion doesn't mean that they'd have this brutal-like law enforcement. Maybe on Summerset, but not the other provinces. In general the Empire is liked, and there'd at least be some kind of small guard regiment left. 1. Its called politics, How do you win the hearts of so many people without making it look like there is more problems then there realy is?

2. Your Empire, and the stormcloaks will also be fighting the Thalmor, as well as a argorian rebelleion they should be defeated, barely, but defeated.

3. Uhuh? the stormcloaks would choose to strike the empire instead of the thalmor?

4. There is 2 spies, likely there will be more, and compleatly disragarding an asset of war is stupid, its like saying that a big country only has 2 soldiers, becusae you only saw two.

5. Well not many only have 2 left,  and as you said  speculation is all we got.

6. Not when theifs and bandits see the opportunity  to get rich, with the Empire not having enough men left. There would be alot of theftery  and there would not be enough people to stop it, Its happend to countrys in the real world.

1. So you're telling me that Galmar was trying to win the hearts of Ulfric? Also, how does telling people that your "Men are getting massacred" out there a way of winning hearts? If anything, people would see the Stormcloaks as a joke because they can't win.

2. The Argonians would sooner back the Dominion than the Empire. Also, the Empire would be greatly weakened by losing Skyrim and vice-versa, the Stormcloaks are worse in matters of quality and quantity than the Legion. Wasting Nord men and women in Stormcloak uniforms is petty, when those same men and women could be trained to be proper Legionairres.

3. The Stormcloaks would get utterly destroyed in a matter of days, then the Dominion has a double launching point. If they'd leave Skyrim near-empty, there's no way for the Empire to know it, so they'd have to split forces. And while the Empire would be busy conqeuring Skyrim to avoid getting attacked in the back, the Dominion would invade Cyrodiil.

4. You're comparing apples to oranges, an army is something different from a spy. Spies are always in way smaller numbers. You can't claim there are more spies unless if you're able to prove it. If you have evidence, it's factual. I won't say it's unlikely, just that it's not an argument, since it's not fact.

5. If all you see is two, all you have is two, until the opposite is proven. We call that innocent until proven guilty.

6. So why didn't it happen during the Great War? I mean, sure, Markarth was lost to the Forsworn, but that was about it.