User blog comment:Zippertrain85/The reasons why Serana is not from the First Era./@comment-5558140-20130511041514/@comment-9062114-20131121072955

I get this comment is 6 months old, but the flaws in it NEEDS to be addressed.

NOTHING indicates that she was one of Moagl Bal's "original Vampires" you just made that up. Serana and her family were turned into Vampires by Moalg Bal, and no that is NOT synonyms with being one of the original Vampires, try again. I never claimed what I said to be any different from that, granted the title could've been better, but that I made that clear. How about reading next time?

What the hell are babbling about? I tried to look what you said up, and found literally no sources for Stonehenge having stones not "even romotely close to that area". And anyway, why would ONE building in Skyrim have it, but no others would?

This is my response to this paragraph: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_gWQaU40PH24/TMp9fG0FM3I/AAAAAAAAJn4/0J_rgUM2dGY/s1600/181148-triple_facepalm_super.jpg

No, someone who's played Skyrim for a week probably knows more lore then you based on your comment. My point was Nobody TRADED with the Nords, since all of Tamriel was ruled by Elves, and Elves didn't like the Nords. This is a commonly known fact in the early First Era, and yet you're actually pompous enough to claim that you know more lore then me?

Except Serana knows exactly where to go right after she was let out of the coffin, accoring to you she was put in there during the early First Era, so the castle must've been that old, by your logic.

I actually just wrote a whole blog on how claming that what I'm saying is "just my opinion" even though they're based on facts is absurd.