User blog comment:Zippertrain85/Is Michael Kirkbride the Godhead?/@comment-16047389-20140303201343

I'm just going to say this. I don't believe that the Waking Dreams is a good source for proving the existence of the Godhead. Now before I continue, let me say that I am not denying or supporting the idea of the Godhead theory, only that the Waking Dreams is not a good source for it.

The Waking Dreams, or at least the part we can read from it, is extremely vague and doesn't say much at all. It simply uses the word "godhead" and not even in a way that supports the idea that it is THE Godhead. The word "godhead" very simply means "deity". This term could easily apply to ANY god, not necessarily the one the Elder Scrolls community often associates it as.

This is the main reason why I remain skeptical to MK's work and the theory on CHIM and the Godhead. Almost everything we know about the two is taken from works that are at best vague and mostly metaphorical, and at worst, nearly incomprehesible. They would all work better if taken in the idea that they were alagorical, but to call them alagories would raise question to their authenticity.