The Elder Scrolls Wiki:Comprehensive Article Nominations

Comprehensive Articles are completed articles of good quality, devoid of redlinks, that, for reasons of length, are unable to successfully become good or featured articles. They must also have, where appropriate, a related image.

Requirements

 * 1) …be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) …be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on TESWiki. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) …have no redlinks.
 * 8) …have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) …have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.

How to nominate

 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 Elder Council supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article."
 * 6) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.

How to vote

 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have at least 50 mainspace edits.
 * 4) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under, if possible. Failure to do so may result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.

Also remember to add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.

Mastengwe

 * Nominated by: Timeoin
 * Comments:

Oppose

 * Seems a bit messy, and incomplete. There isn't enough content really, so I will have to disagree. Ottoman Hold (talk) 19:21, January 9, 2016 (UTC)

Mantella

 * Nominated by: The Rim of the Sky
 * Comments: A very well written article containing in-game and lore-related info, as well as a good list of references.

Support

 * As nominator ☞ Rim < Talk 04:01, January 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * Well referenced, mostly complete. Pretty good article, and I think it deserves to be a CA. Ottoman Hold (talk) 19:24, January 9, 2016 (UTC)


 * Pretty complete and well-written, looks good.

Lyg

 * Nominated by: The Rim of the Sky
 * Comments: An article detailing a subject described by sources that often consist of an odd tone, that manages to utilize the info and define the continent in a way that most can understand, with a fair amount of in-game and out-of-game references.

Support

 * As nominator ☞ Rim < Talk 04:01, January 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * Pretty good, and I think it's about as complete as it will get as of right now. Ottoman Hold (talk) 19:28, January 9, 2016 (UTC)
 * Reason stated above, I think this is a pretty nice article.

Lamae Bal

 * Nominated by: Emperor Jarjarkine (Talk) 04:40, January 10, 2016 (UTC)
 * Comments:  A good written, well sourced, interessting and well sized article, meant to be a CA !

Support

 * Emperor Jarjarkine (Talk) 04:40, January 10, 2016 (UTC)