Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-18750685-20151029173004

The Crusader of Truth wrote: "[is] Sajuuk really valid, or just a case of misunderstanding from the Administrators?" When the majority supports said Administrators' judgement, counter-points are invalid.

It's like saying an incarcerated man shouldn't be emprisoned because it may have been a misunderstanding. A large portion of the people whom have participated in this consensus have casted their vote: Support.

Debating any further will not yield anything, especially when the reasons given by the "court", if you will, outweigh those presented by the "defense". This isn't about hating Sajuuk; the community has let their opinion be heard, and most believe 'twas both necessary and deserved.