Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20140221021620/@comment-5130940-20140221031532

ゆ wrote: Apologies, most of us were unaware that your inactivity was explained, though that is up to the voter as to if they think that's an excuse.

I'm not disputing whether my absence was explained or not - I really don't think it would matter. My main problem is the claimed number of months that I was inactive: six. That is a number unbelievably far off the mark, and it is almost as if no effort was made in verifying such a claim before being posted.

What irritates me further is that both Emperor Jarjarkine and M.Owen LFC! also said that I was inactive for the same period of time without verifying the statement.

And yes, the re-evaluation of staff was discussed, here:

http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:557481

And even so, the discussion for the demotion of staff can take place at any time. And when it comes to the reason for staff being re-evaluated, it mostly stemmed from the change to a nomination system for the hiring of chat mods and forum mods. However, it was best to do it for all staff, considering the upcoming release of ESO, we need to make sure the staff are all suitably active and ready.

Thank you for the thread. I'm not against re-evaluation for staff members, and even if I was, I would feel that I have been gone from the wiki for long enough that I do not know many of the people who are now part of the community.

Instead of "failing" a re-evaluation of admins and patrollers (possibly other staff positions, too, but I'm not certain) on reasons of the lack of activity, I suggest simply moving them to the "Inactive" lists on the TES:A and TES:P pages.