Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4787430-20131215012805/@comment-3523404-20131227032820

Sky Above,Voice Within wrote: So... i believe we haven't got into a consensus yet. Something ought to be done about the lead guidelines.

You basically agreed with everything I said. I find that listing classes in the lead not only summarizes key aspects of the article (which the lead guidelines denotes it as its purpose), and it may assist with players looking to engage in the character in battle, getting a better idea of what to aspect upon fighting them. For example, Spellswords use Blades, whereas Battlemages can use Blades or Blunt, thus poisoning the player's weapon with "Drain Blade" might help them win the fight -- just to give an example of a real-world purpose for this. Either way, I feel that this is almost a non-issue. We're back where we started. The editing convention has always been to omit class information for the essentially class-less game and include it in earlier games. So far, it seems that consensus is with Tomb's original proposition and the one I reiterated.