Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4544033-20160207013932/@comment-11345660-20160213063026

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Come back after only a week and a half...I didn't see a CT for it, so I assume cooler heads prevailed and the decision was allowed to play out, but allow me to throw in my two cents in defense of the way I designed the Moot to deal with community decisions for future situations like this, since some here feel that the way we run our community should not be limited to such a small number of people.

Of course we want the entire community to chime in, but as evidenced in our Moot logs and our most recent CT's (the one before being two months old and something I consider irrelevent at this time), the same people are showing up. No one new is coming. So making a CT would probably draw in maybe another few who missed the Moot, but nothing that gets into the teens. So if we are going by the "the whole community should have a say" logic, you're just doing the exact same thing you accuse the Moot of doing except with a slightly larger amount of people, grinding down the "Entire Community" to little more than a handful. So I consider the argument redundant.

If you truly want others to join the discussion, invite others! If they can't, have a Moot regular represent them! Come on, guys, we're a team. Working together for a solution is key!