User talk:Bluesonic1



Welcome, !

Hello, welcome to the Elder Scrolls Wiki! We're building a collaborative source of information for The Elder Scrolls, and we need your help! We saw you making some changes to our articles and thank you for it. We hope you choose to further this project, and we hope to see you around in the future. If you choose to stay, here are some links to help you out:

Editing policies
 * Policies and guidelines
 * Style guide
 * Media policies

Help out
 * Getting started
 * Pages needing attention
 * Image requests

User policies
 * User signatures
 * User images

FAQ
 * Help directory
 * Editing help

I hope you enjoy editing here! If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask one of our administrators.


 * --EbonySkyrim (talk) 07:05, January 31, 2014 (UTC)

Speculation
How much you may or may not know about a given subject is generally irrelevant when it comes to keeping the wiki strictly about facts. Being a 'crystal enthusiast' and having 'evidence' to back up your claims doesn't make a difference. Like I said, the wiki is about facts, not personal opinions. - Erik the Mad (talk) 09:09, July 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * "...and having 'evidence' to back up your claims doesn't make a difference."... "...the wiki is about facts, not personal opinions". I'm sorry but what you are saying just doesn't add up.


 * I have evidence to make an educated guess as to where inspiration could have been drawn from for the Soul Gem design. It's not merely a personal opinion; it's an educated one. Also, the Vilkas information is educated information too; I have done game testing to reach the conclusions that I have reached. I feel that the points I argue regarding Vilkas' page would be better set in the Bugs section, not Trivia, as it doesn't actually happen (anymore) in-game. Personally I've never seen it happen in-game full-stop, but like I said in previous comments, I do believe this behaviour may have been patched at some point and I encourage others to add in the information they know regarding this.


 * All this aside though, I don't really feel comfortable talking to you about all this as I have seen how you treat other members on your own Talk page. I've spoken to EbonySkyrim and they can help mediate the situation as I'd rather not have it blow out of proportion. Bluesonic1 (talk) 09:24, July 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * You're still not listening.  About the Vilkas thing, though, it does belong in the bugs section, if anywhere, but needs to be discussed on the talk page first, as that is the standard procedure.  Simply not witnessing something first-hand is the worst excuse for claiming a bug to be 'false.' though.  Test all you want, but most are completely random.  I've gone thorugh a dozen files or more before I've seen some of the ones listed on this site, some of which I had actively tried to induce to prove a point (which was, incidentally, that deliberately trying to activate a particular bug is not always reliable).  Also, whether or not the bug was patched makes no difference, as not everyone plays the patched version and, therefore, this information is still applicable to them. - Erik the Mad (talk) 09:47, July 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * I should have mentioned then that I have been scouring through the UESP pages regarding Vilkas and Lycanthropy. There have been no reports there regarding Vilkas getting upset over the player killing an innocent person (1), 1 report of being attacked while transforming (to which no one has replied to sadly) (2) and their Lycanthropy page also, in conjunction with our Lycanthropy page, states none of the Circle should be hostile to the player while they are a werewolf. I have Google'd the first point about Vilkas leaving when the player kills an innocent person and as well as the matching information missing from Farkas' page, I couldn't find anything. On top of all this, I found someone on UESP who found where Vilkas gets untagged from essential and several other people who contribute to pointing out that Vilkas can be killed (4). This covers all 3 of the Vilkas points I wanted to make to the page. Bluesonic1 (talk) 10:03, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Sky Above,Voice Within added the stuff back on the Soul Gem Article. But he removed the info on Vilkas article too, as it apparently already was mentioned somewhere in the aricle. I haven't the time to look through it more now, but I see that you have added a message on Vilka's talkpage. 10:42, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah some of the stuff removed was in both Trivia and Bugs, but some of the Trivia stuff removed wasn't repeated elsewhere, like Vilkas commenting on having killed one of everything so I don't feel that should have been removed as it was genuine information not written anywhere else. Also, would I be able to make my edits to the article now? I have provided 4 different pieces of evidence to prove that Vilkas attacking the Dragonborn during werewolf transformation is a bug, 2 and half (I say half because Google Search coming up with no info isn't that reliable) pieces of evidence that Vilkas leaving you for attacking an innocent person is a bug too or just doesn't happen, not to mention that no one discussed that point in the Talk page yet it was allowed to be added to the page anyway? And my last point, I have a multitude of people who comment in the UESP link I provided above that Vilkas does get untagged from essential, and someone even kindly points out that the tag is removed upon completion of Glory of the Dead. What more do I need to do to prove my points here?? Bluesonic1 (talk) 00:36, July 24, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Ulfric Stormcloak Article
Hey Bluesonic, sure I will change the protection level to semi-protected & you can fix what you need :) Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 15:49, October 21, 2014 (UTC)


 * Yeah no problem, I'll leave it semi-protected for a while in case others feel like editing it some more or not. The edit is good, but I would suggest an edit like that being added somewhere to the article itself, it's also unsourced, & appears to have a speculative nature that should be backed with references. Ȼǿᵰᵮẽᵲ ₲ħǿśᵵ Ⱥᵰᵾᵬĭᵴ  Đẽẽᵭᵴ 20:01, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, saw you edit Ulfric again. Are you finished with it soon? I think Ghost forgot about it and he's now on a break so when you are finished I'd like to put it back to full protection again. EbonySkyrim   Message!   10:28, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah I suppose you are right, but Ulfric is a Featured Article and at the moment we have the policy that FA articles should be locked. It might change when we look through the policies later on. EbonySkyrim   Message!   11:07, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * I know.. we will go through and look at this, even with the FA articles, but the process will not start until later than I anticipated unfortunately. EbonySkyrim   Message!   11:22, December 11, 2014 (UTC)

Dragons page
Hi, I've unlocked the article so you can edit, we have replaced a lot of the images already, but I'll have a look at what you've got. It should be a png image.. I'm leaveing it open for a few days, let me know when you have edited it. EbonySkyrim  Message!   14:05, December 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Great.. Yes, they can lay down on the ground. Have a look at my images I took 2 years ago and posted in my blog here. EbonySkyrim   Message!   07:26, December 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks for the edit and the image was great. EbonySkyrim   Message!   11:23, December 7, 2014 (UTC)

Re: White Stag Bug Section
Hi Bluesonic. After consideration I moved it to the talk page. I did a search myself (and talked to another sysop) and found it only on uesp on the talkpage and some talk in a forum. If it had been more places it was seen on and confirmed on, I would have it be in the article but on uesp.net it's not in the article either. So we need confirmation from more places that it is and not rely on what is said on that website only. So until we have more it will stay on the talkpage. EbonySkyrim  Message!   20:42, December 29, 2014 (UTC)

RE:Heads up
Thanks for letting me know, I will keep an eye on him and make sure everything is OK.

Again, Thanks and happy editing.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 18:53, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

chat
Hey, not sure what time zone you are in, but I'd like to talk about some stuff in the chat. Please join when you can. :) --Sajuuk talk 19:37, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, I understand you are busy, but I'd like to chat in the chatbox if possible. Thanks. :) --Sajuuk talk 16:44, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Team Skyrim
Hey, I am glad to see you have said you would help with the Skyrim articles.

As of now, User:Tehpwner7067 and User:Atvelonis are also committed to this. Others may join, but until then the three of you should talk and figure out the best way to handle this project.

Besides expanding this area of the wiki, another thing you should look out for are articles that could become featured article. If you come across an article or two that could be brought to FA standards, do what you can so we can show it off on the main page.

Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns that would like to share. Thanks and happy editing-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 21:24, January 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * Hey Bluesonic. Since we're both on Team Skyrim, I figured I should ask you if you have any ideas on what we could work on in the future. You can come on chat (I am on a lot) or leave a message on my talk page if you have any suggestions. See you around! ―Atvelonis (talk) 22:48, January 31, 2015 (UTC)

First project
Hey Bluesonic. I have been thinking about what we should start working on and, frankly, there are a whole lot of things to add. However, I wanted to start off with something relatively small and simple for the time being; a little project that could get us off the ground would be to add concise summaries of the content of books on Books (Skyrim) and Books (Skyrim)/Letters. Some of them are filled in already, others are not. Books (Skyrim)/Journals should probably have the same table that the other ones have as well, with summaries like the others.

Is this something you would be interested in? If so, when would be a good time to start? And, of course, if you have any questions, comments, or ideas about anything regarding Team Skyrim, you can post them at our Team's Guild Hall. ―Atvelonis (talk) 02:36, February 4, 2015 (UTC)

GUI
Hey Blue. I saw your edit on Wylandriah's Satchel, good work. By the way, you can use the console command  to hide the GUI so that we can take better images. Have fun editing! —Atvelonis (talk) 14:13, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Windhelm Article
I cannot say I am to gifted on lore, but I will take a look at this and see what I can fix. Both articles are needing a lot of work, and I am starting to get concerned why they where marked as good when both have needed to be worked on so heavily.

Thanks for pointing this out and giving some sources to look at.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 05:42, March 18, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Policy Thingies
I will take a look at them, and highlight them if they are policy's we should look at. I am glad to see that there are others who are pointing out policy's we need to look at and update. Thanks for letting me know.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 19:49, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, here are my thoughts on this, since you brought this up to me, I want to run it by you first.
 * We start two new to CT's, one for each of them. Both had an idea that was listed as a possible fix, Tomb noted a bug fix and you noted how Dark souls wiki handles Triva. Both these ideas seemed to be accepted and I think we should see how these two ideas ring and focus the conversations on those topics and try to come to a consensus on repair to these area's. What do you think?-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 20:13, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, just thought you should know I posted a possible solution that might work out better than just highlighting tons of threads (they become ineffective if too many are highlighted) on CCC's talkpage. Am posting here in case you didn't see my message :) --Sajuuk talk 20:39, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * I can handle it, although as we are doing a lot of policy review, I will highlight one large thread that will list all the current policy reviews, instead of marking each one on its own. Give me a few minutes to write it all out and set it all up.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 20:57, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Windhelm v2
As is as well as can be. Wiki is changing and I am having to learn to deal with change. So far everything has been good, so the learning process has been easy.

I marked Windhelm for GAnom. I recommend as you are the one who did the more recent work on it that you write the nomination out. I can see you put more then a little work into it, and the sources are nice.

If you get the chance, I am in the IRC right now, I was wondering if you could join so I could run something by you. Either way, thanks and happy editing.

-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 00:04, April 1, 2015 (UTC)