Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-24349111-20140611203956/@comment-6941549-20140624180115

DarthOrc wrote: Likes-That-Tail wrote: If a moderator breaks a rule that other users would be banned for, we definitely shouldn't need to consensus them for their powers to be revoked. They should lose their powers immediately and be banned, just like they'd be if they didn't have a flag. We agree, with the provision that a mod accused of breaking rules be given their day in court, as it were. We feel the principle should be that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Correct me if I am wrong but isn't there a consensus like that already?