Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-9062114-20151025032401

It seems as if the community has (mostly) agreed that SuperSajuuk does deserve a ban from his previous behaviors that were not accounted for in any punishments. That sounds fine, but I do have to ask is a one year ban really fair in that case?

If Sajuuk did truly deserve a ban due to misbehaving, shouldn't it be something more like a month? I mean, this would be only his second valid ban, which was originally only a week. A year is too big of a jump from that really. He might realize the problem in his attitude in a couple weeks, but be prevented from using the Wiki for a long time to come. How is that fair? A year is a long time and he won't be able to come on chat, give his opinions on Forums, or even edit the Wiki.

What I'm saying is, maybe he does deserve a ban from insults and whatnot but a year is way too extreme, and he'll probably calm himself down in a much shorter time than that. So this excessively long ban, is not only unfair but isn't necessary. There is even less reason for it when we realize the suspicion of using alts doesn't have that much big proof to it. At most he would need/deserve a three month complete ban from the Wiki.

Put yourself it his shoes guys, say you were having some anger on here for the past couple of times, you get banned realize you were wrong and cannot come back to the Wiki for a long time, wouldn't that be frustrating and unfair, it seems that way to Sajuuk, especially considering this would technically only be his second big banning offense.

If after a moderately long amount of time breaking from the community this is still a problem, then we can argue for longer terms. I thin that sounds very fair & reasonable to both parties.