Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25020300-20141230050558/@comment-24325144-20150110013457

Yeah it's on the White Stag article, but not the quest itself. That's what I looked at. Yes they do have a template for that, my point was they don't always add every unconfirmed bug to an article. There has to be a line drawn when it comes to those things. As they point out in the link I showed you, it's best when members of the community confirm it themselves for obvious reasons.

You seem to be missing the point here, the reason they're confirmed first is exactly that reason. Credibility, anybody can simply add any bug to any article at any time. Confirming bugs is common practice, & the reason it needs to be confirmed here, is the same reason it needs to be confirmed there. Because it's displayed here. When we display information, we strive to make sure it's actually facutal information like any wiki should do.

Jimeee really ins't the topic here, but he was on UESP for several years before he got CT'd by the community & lost his user rights & then left for UESP altogether. & yes that we agree on, the wiki here is lacking on information in many areas.

I find it strange that you throw me into this, when I haven't pick & chosen when to enforce anything. You do realize I was made an administrator only a few months ago right? & you say that past things that were added here was accepted. But by who, me? Because despite popular belief, administrators aren't on this 24/7 365 & see everything that goes on here. There are other staff positions here you know. So I really fail to see how this has any bearing on anything, I mainly see either agree with everything I'm saying. Or you're being entirely subjective. That's not how things work.