User blog comment:Pelinal Whitestrake/About Aka, Lorkhan and broken Windows/@comment-11345660-20140209010228/@comment-11345660-20140213061323

Ugh, and on it goes. I think we should just drop the whole Alduin is related to Akatosh thing, since we have already said all we can say. You think they are related, I don't think they are. You can't prove they are, I can't prove they aren't. I think we should just agree to disagree on that.

Along with the aspects being similar. You dissaprove by saying just because I say it isn't true, doesn't mean its right. I agree, my theory is not absolute. But yours isn't either. Again, agree to disagree.

Ugh, f***ing Dawn era and its inconsistent timeline. I blame Daggerfall for screwing up everything. I get the drift the writers didn't know which ending they wanted to make canon, so they just went with all of them, thereby screwing up the entire timeline for everything ever.

Why shouldn't I ask you why they split apart? If we answer this question with a viable answer, maybe I won't shrug at the shards theory. This is the question we should be aiming to answer, and once we figure it out, then we can focus on the details.

You know that other pantheons could have their own legends. The tales of Wullfarth could literally mean just Shor and Alduin rather than Akatosh.

You didn't pay attention to what I said about Sheor did you? Literally a sentence of information. We need more than that. But, if you want a similarity, Lorkhan is kind of the source of all strife within Mundus. He brought about the destruction of the Aedra, the eventual creation of the mortla and all of their problems, so there's your similarity.

Just because I make the very reasonable assumption to take nothing seriously until it provides proof does not make me have Sh*tty lore. It just means I am thinking more about it before I make an assumption as to what is right and what is wrong. Not everyone has to believe in the same lore as you.

You cannot say the mortals are proof when you can't even proove that the Aedra were shards at all. You are literally just saying Oh the mortals are shards too. You can't expect me to take that as proof. I can say anything I want about the mortals too, you know. The Khajjitt are descendants of Lorkhan. Can you dissprove that? Sure, it's probably complete nonsense, but without bringing up the Monomyth or something someone said in a book for once which may or may not even be true, can you proove that I am wrong?

You are just completely ignoring the Dunmer aren't you? Azura, A DAEDRIC PRINCE, created their entire damn race! How is that not having a connection? And wasn't your theory founded on the power of mortal belief? If they believe in different things, and the Daedra have an extremely large following throughout Tamriel, why doesn't it affect the Daedra? Because they "aren't connected enough?" Because the Daedra are not their ancestors? Because they didn't creare Nirn? So what? And you seem to forget that only the Elves were descended from the Aedra according to legend. Where did everyone else come from? I am not saying everyone else came from the Daedra, of course not, but for some of the bestial races like Khajjit, or other races like the Orsimer and Dunmer, they are tied to the events that went on with the Daedra. If an entire race being the result of a Daedra's actions isn't "Connected", I dont know what is. If that isn't simple enough for you, I'll say it again one last time: MORTALS ARE CONNECTED TO THE DAEDRA AS WELL AS THE AEDRA.