Board Thread:Consensus track/@comment-4787430-20130806031837/@comment-5308644-20130806051838

It is my understanding that the lead is a brief overview of the article's subject. I am concerned that if it is not followed by a header that allows a more detailed description, location articles can end up with unusually long leads in comparison to other subjects, and push the table of contents down the page where it seems out of place. We can insert manually, but I highly prefer limiting the size of the lead and using a header.

I agree that "Sublocations" (or a similarly ambiguous word that is applicable to all types of locations) should be used rather than "Rooms".

I have no opinion or preference concerning Quests vs. Interactions. The current SF says there should be both Interactions and Quests – which makes little sense to me.

I would also like to propose a "Services", "Amenities", or similarly named header for a list of merchants, enchanters, innkeepers, etc., and concise details of what they offer. Although it may overlap with information in the lead or description to some extent, in my experience readers generally prefer a quick and easy way to find information rather than reading through paragraphs of text.

Also, although listing the characters found at a location in the infobox is fine most of the time, IMHO sometimes there are too many. I believe that there should be some sort of standard that limits how many can be listed in an infobox, and a provision made for locations where there are an abnormally high number of characters. In Morrowind it is not uncommon to find a dozen or more characters in a single location. Sometimes there are 20+. At some point it just becomes too much.