Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-24325144-20150106201659/@comment-4799587-20150109061452

Bluesonic1 wrote: I really think speculative trivia could benefit from a similar template-tagging system that the Bug section is going to hopefully transition to- in that unconfirmed or speculative points get a kind of thing next to them so people know that it's an interesting point to read but it's also speculative in nature. That way it can stay on the article's page without presenting itself as 100% factual. Why should we even have speculation, no other wiki or even wikipedia have speculation. It needs to be confirmed until we add it to our articles. The trivia section is for facts and not speculation like this for example: this character is probably related to this character in another game. As Ghost say in his post.. it's removed for a good reason..