User blog comment:MonkeydashUnderscore/Imperials Or Stormcloaks?/@comment-166.82.245.89-20120509022646

I find several errors in this article, not least of which is the fact that it says General Tullius sent you to execution when he certainly did not. Some of the more important errors include but are not limited to: The Redguards did not "drive out" the Dominion, they held them off for five years (impressive, but still) until the Dominion decided it was too costly and simply pulled out, I think there's a big difference there.

Another thing, why does it portray Ulfric in a positive light? Its blatantly obvious the man is simply after the power of High King, if he didn't want bloodshed then he would have at least tried diplomacy and asked Toryyg to leave the Empire peacefully, IMO Ulfric is either simply after the power or really stupid. Also, we get the chance to meet Toryyg, who admits it was a consenting dual (however one-sided it was)

Also another thing, he fails to mention how, to the best of our knowledge, Hammerfell separated relatively peacefully, it didn't have some big bloody civil war as far as what we know, and thus, it wasn't severely weakened in terms of soldiers, and was at relatively full strength, compared to Skyim. IMO Skyrim needs Imperial support now more than ever

He also fails to mention that there are a lot of tension between the Empire and the Dominion, they can't stay buddies for long (Hell, they never were buddies) and doesn't go into detail about "The Great War", how there was not ONE imperial Legion at half-strength, and while Titus could have tried to negotiate better terms, its safe to say both sides were out of steam and people wanted a quick end to the war.

Now this isn't an error, why couldn't he have at least compared, oh I don't know, the Jarls and possible Jarls fo their respective holds against each other? Like Baalgruuf vs Gray-Mane? And say which one is better overall, instead of simply listing them as pros\cons? And why is Korir listed as a pro? Its obvious he is not willing to consider the College of Winterhold may not have had anything to do with the Great Collapse. And he doesn't strike me as a better Jarl compared to Kralder. I would say if wasn't going to at least say, "Jarl X is better than Jarl Y", At least put SOME stuff into a "not good, not bad" section, or better yet, don't add them at all.

There are a lot more lore related issues and otherwise I could go into, but overall, this guy doesn't seem to know what he is talking about and seems heavily biased from the beginning, I know I'm pretty biased too, but least I try to keep my facts fairly straight.