Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25020300-20141230050558/@comment-1738746-20150109235224

Ghost, if you are referring to the White Stag incident, it is indeed on the UESP "Ill Met By Moonlight" Talk page AND it is on the White Stag's article page. Likewise, UESP actually has a template for identifying unconfirmed bugs, which are submitted and left on their articles. On top of this, that White Stag bug is also discussed on this random forum. This was all from the first page of Google results- if you gave me time, I would certainly unearth more for you. But this is my point- it's a bug that's in several places and discussed by several people but it's still considered unconfirmed? Why is the sole criteria of a bug to be classified as confirmed have to be that it needs to be discussed on a Talk page on this Wiki? Ever considered that maybe people talk about Skyrim outside of this Wiki? This is one of the other main reasons I want an unconfirmed tag in place- whether a bug is confirmed or not appears to be an extremely subjective case despite you guys harping on about it being objective and raising the Wiki's credibility. It's not raising the Wiki's credibility- it's lowering its pool of contents.

@NOTATHALMORSPY: I wouldn't be surprised if he did, that place has far more information than this Wiki. No offence with that, but this is why I want to strive for positive changes on the Wiki. I like the layout of this place much more that UESP but the content is really lacking on this Wiki.

Also I have to strongly agree on the note NOTATHALMORSPY made regarding policy enforcement- you admins really pick and choose what you want to enforce, and I know this from first hand experience. Past "unconfirmed" bugs I've added were accepted fine and some in the case of the White Stag weren't. Again, this doesn't help your case of building the Wiki's credibility on objective edits considering how subjective you guys are yourselves.