Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150210213900/@comment-4947013-20150308170734

I believe the "Agent" category, personally, to be uneeded, along with any other "sort by class" categories. In my opinion, this could confuse things even further, potentially. Say we had a warrior in the fighters's guild who is also a Battlemage, by class. This would lead to much confusion, as he would also be sorted in with people at the Mage's Guild, and any NPC Mercenary who has a Battlemage Class. A thief who is technically a rogue class would be getting lumped in with all the wrong people. The point I'm trying to make here is that the guilds are already detailed enough. We have fighters that are dual weilders, sword and shield, just a sword, two handed sword, archers, battlemages. We have people in the thieves guild that are rogues, archers, illusionists, and actual thieves, mages have battlemages, illusionists, Wizards, sorcerers, summoners, necromancers. while the overlay seems minimal, take into account that notonly would people from the guilds be getting singled out from their brethren, they would also be bunched up with people whom are only barely linked with each other. Like say, bandits and forsworn belong in the hostile npc category. With respect, No. Just no.