Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20141006104150/@comment-1251315-20141027230008

SuperSajuuk, on a related note, why have you been moving some of The Elder Scrolls V: Dragonborn location articles to the disambiguous page? I don't think a consensus has been reached on that policy yet. Because 2-link disambiguations are against TES:DISAMBIG, someone like yourself should know that disambiguations are made when there are 3+ articles on a topic, not just for something that appears twice only (that's what For is for).

I am clearing up the many 2-link disambiguations that some users have been making so that people are more likely to find what they're searching for, without clicking linking unnecessarily. The chances are that someone who is searching for Raven Rock is going to be searching for the Dragonborn version: a For template addition means a link is provided for those who were looking for the Bloodmoon version.

That doesn't need a consensus, as it is already against wiki policy. Also, I talked with the sysops and they are fine with me clearing up the 2-link disambiguations as they should've been long ago.