The Elder Scrolls Wiki:Comprehensive Article Nominations

Comprehensive Articles are completed articles of good quality, devoid of redlinks, that, for reasons of length, are unable to successfully become good or featured articles. They must also have, where appropriate, a related image.

Requirements

 * 1) …be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) …be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) …be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on TESWiki. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) …have no redlinks.
 * 8) …have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) …be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) …have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) …include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.

How to nominate

 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 Elder Council supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article."
 * 6) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.

How to vote

 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) Please note that in order for your vote to count, you must have at least 50 mainspace edits.
 * 4) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under, if possible. Failure to do so may result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 5) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.

Also remember to add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.

Nominate an Article
Existing nominations are displayed below.

Balreth

 * Nominated by: Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 20:18, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * Comments: Completed article, written from neutral point-of-view, and explains what happenes during the related quests in a flowing, readable manner, instead of bullet-points. Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 20:18, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Support

 * As nominator Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 20:18, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * Now that the redlink has been removed, I think that it fits the standards. Ottoman Hold (talk) 02:18, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * I looked as hard as I could, the only reference I could find is the book, The Brothers of Strife. There may be more, but the book seems to cover most of the background information. The article itself looks as great, other than that. With that said, I feel like we could "jump the gun on it," as I think the saying goes.

Neutral

 * A good article, I think. But I feel some references for the background section wouldn't hurt. Thus my neutral vote. Mondblueme (talk) 07:46, January 19, 2016 (UTC)Mondblueme
 * This is very, very, very close. And I like Balreth. He's awesome. References are needed, however. I'm sure if someone doesn't get round to it, I will at some point. Bronkiin (talk) 13:40, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

Agronak gro-Malog

 * Nominated by: Cheatcodechamp
 * 'The Article is done, and I feel it is well worded to be as well sized as possible. It is of a important character, and I think we can say this article meets our standards:

Support

 * - As nominator. -Cheatcodechamp (talk) 23:49, January 29, 2016 (UTC)


 * Seems alright, complete, appropriate. I think it can be a CA. Ottoman Hold (talk) 01:00, January 30, 2016 (UTC)


 * This article looks fine to me. Informative as well as interesting to read. I give it my support. Mondblueme (talk) 08:36, January 30, 2016 (UTC)


 * Looks fine to me. Didn't look over it too much though, I'll check everything to the letter later :P

Privateer's Hold (Quest)

 * Nominated by:
 * Comments: Complies with everything except #19, however, has an interwiki on the Disambig.

Support

 * As nominator.

Neutral

 * Seems ok, but that notice needs to be dealt with more. Afterward, maybe I'll support. Ottoman Hold (talk) 18:03, January 30, 2016 (UTC)