Board Thread:Skyrim/@comment-10133254-20130530100553/@comment-26332923-20150811164646

Ylva Moonfang wrote: What pronoun am I talking about? The one that I used that started this argument.

I don't care what the "official" Dragonborn is, I'm referring to the Dragonborn as a she because I play as a she. If you don't like it, tough, go cry me a river.

Already explained. Read.

I dodged your questions? I've answered them with either answers or telling you to reread previous comments. If you are too lazy to read my comments, then you should stop arguing and bringing up old questions that I already answered.

And, I'll ask again, since you have dodged the question. What exactly have you proved me wrong in?

Here's another thing you have dodged. What are your theories on how both Skjor and Kodlak have been overtaken?

I'll say once more, you cannot just say "you're wrong" and not say the reason why. You also cannot say you proved someone wrong without actually doing so. Doing so means your entire argument is invalid, which it is.

Also, don't accuse someone of doing something that you have been doing all along... That's rather hypocritical. And why are you not saying what that is?

No, because it doesn't matter if you care or not. That is the official Dragonborn. It is no she.

You haven't explained it to me.

No, there is no "lazy". You haven't answered my questions.

What have i proved you wrong in? This argument.

Here's my answer, i have no "theory". Neither do you. Why? Because a theory requires proof.

I have already told you the reason why. Learn to read. I have indeed also proved you wrong. What argument is invalid? I have proved you wrong, which makes you invalid. You need to clarify more. Especially "which it is".

What have i been doing all along? Like i said earlier, you need to clarify better. Now explain that. "Hypocritical".