Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-26316533-20150415233335/@comment-3076045-20150416225648

^Indeed. I believe it was one of MK's works.

Ive always seen them as Draevan has - they arent exactly fanon, but they are a different "tier" of Canon. (Sort of like how star wars does it?)

The way I see it is like this: 1. Anything from the video games (and also the book series, since thats officially endorsed). 2. Things from bethesda/zenimax websites (for example, the interactive maps for ESO). 3. Anything published about the series from previous authors of the series. its Out of game, but still relevant. 4. Other "official" but unconfirmed sources. (I would say Imperial Library sources should still definitely be included - As long as their own research is marked as such)

Anything else (Unless ive missed something?) ... is fanon, and shouldnt be allowed on here. At least... thats how I see it. Discussion about this welcome. (Also, those placings arent exactly definite - there is some give-and-take there).