User blog comment:Longdead97/Ulfric's war effort & gaining support. Smart move or no?/@comment-7055753-20130331031939

So, it seems for the most part that this has run its course and I believe I know the basic consensus. (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.)

1. Ulfric would not agree to this because he is highly predjudicial, although he isn't the notiable racist/speciest. His actions against High King Torygg set a larger precidence of instilling fear among the other Jarl's than his retaking of Markarth. While he makes note of the player's chosen race, he is the type of leader that wouldn't allow any non-nord to join his army. While he is power-hungry, he doesn't seem to be as level headed as one might expect. While his ultimate goal is High King, he is prepared to wait until the other Jarl's convene a moot, even though he has replaced those that might oppose him.

2. Even if Ulfric agreed to it, his supporters and troops might be more willing to abandon the cause since it would appear that he is becoming weak by both making peace and working with the Forsworn.

3. Ulfric is arguebly racist/specie-ist however, it isn't as apparent with him as it is with Galmar Stone-Fist or the majority of Stormcloak soldiers that are encountered. Even though it is noted that Red Guards are seen heading towards Windhelm to join the Stormcloaks, none are seen in the army.

4. The Forsworn have put themselves in a bad spot by attacking anyone who enters the Reach that isn't either a Forsworn or a Breton. They are so set on taking control of the Reach that they can't seem to look past the murder of anyone who is against them.

Over all, while the idea may look decent on paper, it would not work in actuallity due to both sides being short-sighted and set in their ways. Thank you to everyone who replied, it has been fun reading the thoughts on a matter that seemed rather unique when I posted it. (I realize that I probably missed a lot of good points, but I believe I got the general points.)