Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150307101537/@comment-26017205-20150308200350

SuperSajuuk wrote:

Wulfharth wrote: The Rim of the Sky nailed it. This whole disambiguation thing is a waste of time because both pages in either game are equally important. Just keep doing the game name in the brackets instead of the "for" template. Makes it easy to identify pages by just the title.

Also, you are just creating waaaaay more work for yourself later down the road. You will need to rename and relink ALL the affected pages when TES6 comes out, if it shares the same locations as previous games. Then again for TES7. Pointless. I can't believe no one considered this before doing all this work. Why would it be creating work? We can't just start predicting locations that will exist in games that don't even exist yet. Issues should be brought up when they're an issue, pre-empting issues is pointless and harms the wiki in the long run. There are certain trends that you can predict in TES games, and if you are knowledable about the games, you can plan for them. That is what Rim of the Sky seems to be doing. Its called foresight and doesn't hurt anyone.

Based on the huge number of locations in ESO already, you can bet money that many will reappear later down the road. Its not very smart to ignore precedents that the series is well known for.