Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-27007772-20140721212839/@comment-3523404-20140723033725

ShawnHowellsCP wrote: Deyvid Petteys wrote: - Far too radical a consequence for a minor squabble. The nominator is directly and emotionally involved with the situation, and their emotions clearly color their decision. The pastebin log is clear; it is transparent to me that Shadow was antagonizing Elchzard. Both parties were guilty of incivility, and Shadow's attempts to deescalate the situation were insincere in tone, to be sure. Yet, I do not feel that the proposal above solves anything at all. Is it just me or have the users of the wiki focused more on their war-path to de-sop everyone than actually editing the wiki? If we had more active editors than chat sloths and forum ghouls, those with administrative skills would emerge as well. So, let's focus on improving our articles! Allons-y! If he does good on the site, but not on chat, I wish he could actually only have main-site power. To bad he can't. If this consensus fails, and he does this to ANY user again, I will be going straight to wikia staff with all of my screenshots, and a multi-paragraph complaint.

Feel empowered to contact Wikia at any point. Removal of bureaucratship can only be done with visible consensus from the community. In other words, had this thread proved the community desired the de-sopping of Harry, they would remove his tools. Only special cases permit exceptions to this rule, but those exceptions are incredibly rare. Infinitesimal to no action will be done should you approach the Big Wigs.