Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4705438-20140215144931/@comment-14027812-20140215191044

Nerevarine465 wrote: Sky Above,Voice Within wrote:

Nerevarine465 wrote:

Sky Above,Voice Within wrote:

I believe that, if an article has conflitcing lore on its subject, it should list the game lore, and have a trivia point saying that there are contradictions to it. If there will be loads of more contradictions added by C0DA, the same is to happen, but with the addition of a link to a page regarding the contradictions. But why does that have to be necessary? It's not official Bethesda, it doesn't appear in-game....

If I make a fanfiction, why would I put it on the wiki or say it's canon? If my fanfiction is based off of real occurences and makes sense, I still would not say it's canon because of the mere fact that it isn't! Going by the fact that Bethesda allows Kirkbride to write their lore? Going by the fact that this isn't Bethesda? And that if any of Kirkbride's writing have been canon, that they have been put in-game or something along those lines by Bethesda? All of MK's writings are canon. I use that argument to try, without success, to prove to you Kirkbride crusaders that MK is canon.

I don't want to discuss this any further here. Please create a thread.