Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-25356303-20170205030108/@comment-26893431-20170205233406

Bronkiin wrote: I'm referring to instances, for example, where the game is in the title. Equally, the "de-cluttering" argument still stands, and should still be applicable for pages like "Ulfric Stormcloak" who really don't need it. And what is the policy if the character appears in multiple games? For some, we have seperate articles for the same character depending on what game they appear. How would it work for "Mannimarco", who has different pages for each game? Or characters who have both a lore page and an in-game page? I wasn't at a lot of the moot, but I'm assuming this was thought out. If it wasn't, I think we should use common sense when judging whether to include the game in the lead, as opposed to adding it across the board.

I think there's an easy solution for this. Though since I'm not the best editor around here a second opinion is needed.

You know how pages are seperated through the use of "categories", right?

So how about we do something like that for characters that appear in multiple games. Example:

General Tullius ---Skyrim--- In general Tullius commands the Imperial Legion etc. ---Legends--- In general Tullius has a damage of (insert) and defense of (insert), his ability is (insert) etc.

It might sound a bit vague how I say it, but I think you get my point.