Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20150118170012/@comment-5632187-20150118172718

To see a sysop acting like this in a community trying to rebuild itself is asinine. A user with intentions only to help further this Wiki, made the choice to bypass dysfunctional policies in order to try to scrape together what he could of the Wiki and keep it in tact. None of the so-called sysops still here were attempting anything of the like.

Sajuuk, while many people may not always agree with him, clearly only cares about the betterment of the Wiki. To block him for trying to do what you sysops are too lazy to do is completely counter-productive and destructive to any sense of trust between regular editors and the current sysops.

Not only were the grounds of blocking SuperSajuuk utterly ridiculous, but the sysop in question has not contributed to furthering anything on this Wiki in 5 months. Sysops are meant to do certain things around the Wiki regular editors cannot. I'd like to ask, which of you sysops were planning on nominating a user, or users, to become a sysop? I didn't see any of you taking the initiative to fix the severe blow to the community, so why shouldn't the other editors who actually care about the community do it? Because some policy says so? If you're going to prevent users from becoming sysops based on a policy, perhaps you should start doing your job first, and you wouldn't have to worry about this Wiki's users trying to become sysops.