Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26896471-20151004010902/@comment-1738746-20151010014209

I'm strongly opposed to changing this week's one now for all the reasons people highlighted. It's too soon, no consensus was reached and very short notice. Rim, despite the notification, people do have lives outside this wiki and don't check in that often. And even if they do, many have to plan ahead to make time to attend the moot. Testing it with this short notice is going to come out bad for you guys too with a lower attendance rate, when a bit of planning could have given you more numbers. Let's not rush things.

Also, to Atvelonis's comment, yes I can make it if it's just 4 hours. That's essentially what I've bitching about this whole time, COMPROMISE. I realise that 4 hours is not ideal for the 6 hour people, but considering it's just 2 hours I'm sure the majority can compromise in the same way that I'm willing to so that we ALL can attend. 6am isn't ideal for me, of course, but I'm willing to do it if it means others can attend- I just wished others had the heart to extend the same courtesy to myself and others.

I'm sorry for the language and coming across as rude, but I genuinely am pissed off. The first time the moot timing was brought up in the moot, I was the ONLY person to pester it to be made a CT because I knew we all had some room to be flexible, enough to allow others to join in the moot. Obviously it didn't go through as I was alone in it, but the second time it was brought up, I was among the people who again asked to get a CT made, all this despite the current moot time suiting me beautifully. Now, for trying to be nice and compromise for the sake of others, I'm going to be cut out of the moot. So yeah, forgive me for my attitude, but I am pretty pissed off that people aren't willing to be more flexible.