Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-17087283-20131214225450/@comment-13446185-20131215234110

89.245.247.230 wrote: Jimeee wrote: Dovahsebrom wrote: Jimeee wrote: It not for the MK hate. It's because it's such an obscure and highly speculative thing, that an article would not really work. The refs would all be MK works. What are your opinions on there being a page for CHIM? CHIM is different as there is basis in the lore. The problem is very few people on this wiki are knowledgable enough about MK lore to do it properly. It's no good making a stub page about it.

You are quite knowlegable, so if you wish to try, then I'd support that - but a page should be sandboxed first with input from a few others.

An inacurate CHIM page is much much worse than a no CHIM page - especially for the already mixed reputation of this wiki.

I know, I'm just a wikia contributor without an account, but I agree with you. On the Bethesda forum, almost everyone says that this wiki is bad because of reasons like "lore is inaccurate in the Elder Scrolls Wiki" or like "They ignore MK". I think that a relatively accurate page about CHIM would really help to make the reputation of this wiki a little bit better. Maybe even something about Amaranth or Enatiomorph. I'm thinking CHIM just for now. As you said there are alot of pages with inacurate lore and that is a more important thing to deal with.