Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-71.58.163.238-20130703034923/@comment-13446185-20140329172703

71.61.177.24 wrote: Wow. You're willfully misinterpreting sources, and I'm immature for recognizing that not all sources are reliable? Since when do people get to strawman that I'm upset because you're inconveniencing my argument with your totally legit and not intentionally misconstrued, oh no, I'm the bad one here for not convoluting the meaning of lore beyond all belief "facts"?

I'm sorry, I didn't realize I started this argument.

Not saying that you did.

I just jumped in, is all.

- WorshipsMeridia I'm not misinterpreting sources at all, I even gave you a reason why each of the sources can be trusted (save for the first one which my reason was that you have been using it yourself, which means saying it is wrong would contradict your own argument).

Obviously not all sources are reliable (but normally that can be seen quite easily ex: The Annotated Anuad, The Bear of Markarth are both sources that can't be trusted entirely), I make sure that the sources I use have no contradictions to them (which there aren't any for these sources).

The reason why you are "the bad one here" is because you believe that I'm stupid for disagreeing with you. I respect your argument and interpretation of the lore, but when you include lines like "SWEET F*CKING MERIDIA WILL YOU PLEASE JUST STOP"  and "Second, I cannot even with your utter horse feces at this point" you just make yourself look like an absolute a*shole, and that doesn't help your argument at all.

Why I am disagreeing with your argument is because there is no actual lore that directly states the Septims aren't legitimately dragonborn, while there are sources that claim the contrary.