Board Thread:Online Discussion/@comment-5247041-20130821093041/@comment-15888551-20130822194054

PsijicThief wrote: If they back out 100% on it now, they've got no backbone. I'll lose all respect for them at that point. They need to leave it Pay to Play at this point, but lower the cost and add a small cash shop. A compromise to regain the support would be more appropriate than an all out backpeddle. I could deal with $5/month. Maybe do a version of the game for 100-110 bucks that has a year prepaid. That seems pretty fair.