Board Thread:Consensus track/@comment-4787430-20130803000807/@comment-5773740-20130803041117

Kroq-gar78 wrote: I'd like to add that 1stm is already hardly used by any articles, and also that it really isn't being added to any more.

I say if we're going to only use for mentions, then we should do the equivalent for normal appearances: don't state whether it was the first appearances or not, simply that it was there. The chronological order of the appearances section should be enough to determine which game the article's topic first appeared or was mentioned in.

I agree with Kroq-gar78 and believe that should be the only appearances template needed.