Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26893431-20160706230803

So I've recently noticed (and this really bothers me) that both the Novels (Lord of Souls & Infernal City) are considered 'OOG' sources. While you might say 'Well, OOG stands for Out Of Game, they belong there' (which I agree with) I seriously disagree with them being labeled the same as the MK 'lore'. Unlike MK lore (which is far from always used by Bethesda, let alone, always considered canon) both of these Novels are 1. Considered canon by Bethesda. And 2. Made upon the request of Bethesda.

What I'm getting at is that, labeling true lore which is confirmed as canon as the same thing as MK seems a bit... Off... But maybe that's just me. 