User talk:Rpeh

Quit deleting articles..It is okay to copy articles from other wikis unsigned comment from Darth Storm
 * No it isn't. Please see the message I just left on your talk page. rpeh 14:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * ok wont happen again but i think i recall that wikipedia states that all wikis can use any material from another wiki. unsigned comment from Darth Storm
 * With attribution. As our copyright page states:
 * "You may fufill the last two obligations by directly linking back to the article hosted on the site as well as the history page of the article. For example, if you were to use the article "Felsaad Coast" from our site, an example notice might read as follows:
 * This article is licensed under the Creative Commons by-sa license. It uses material from the UESP article "Bloodmoon:Felsaad Coast". "
 * rpeh 14:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

srry wont happen again unsigned comment from Darth Storm

Can we upload images form you site as long as we give you full credit like i did on the images on Hannibal traven and carahil. unsigned comment from Darth Storm
 * The administrator of this site has just asked you not to, so I would suggest that you don't. rpeh 14:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Images
Actually I am not an administrator, just a member of the FA System, so I cannot delete the images. Darth Storm 13:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I only did that to tidy up the pages until Kaj or another admin can delete them. Darth Storm 13:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Under new management
I won't be taking active part in this wiki for a while. User:Xell Khaar will run the wiki in my absence. He appears familiar with UESP, but I don't think he's an active contributor there. If there's copyright issues on this wiki, tell Xell about it, and hopefully the issue will be resolved. I created Template:UESP and Template:UESPImage for this wiki as well. If Xell does what Darth Storm once did and ignores you, feel free to tell me, and I'll step in. I'll gladly deleted any image or page copied from UESP without proper attribution. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 17:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up. You should also watch out for people copying material from Wikipedia too. this article is copied word-for-word from this one and doesn't credit WP anywhere. –Rpeh•T•C•E• 17:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me. Xell said that he wanted to rewrite all the articles, so I left a blank slate for him to work with. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 17:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

UESP
This is a joke, right? Your watching us? Do you realize how pathetic you sound? It's a website for crying out loud, not The Godfather. ''You aren't the only one. You're not special. You aren't even the biggest site we watch.'' Well, I must say, I'm terrified, really. I don't know how I'll be able to sleep tonight knowing that you'll be at your computer all night, fishing through our recent changes page, looking for dirt. Also, you say You do your site and leave us to do ours. That's bit contradictory seeing as how you admit to watching other sites. I know the old members of this site have stolen content from your site before, but that's no reason to suspect everyone of doing so. As far as I'm aware nobody from the new community has taken anything that does not belong to us. And as for those case images, there not yours, so you have absoloutley no right to claim they were stolen from you. Besides, seeing as UESP has engaged in acual vandalism of other Elder Scrolls sites. You are hardly in any position to take the moral high ground. Arandil 07:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * If you don't steal our content (or Wikipedia's) then there's no problem. I've already said I don't care about those box images because they're PD, but if you didn't get them from UESP you could always provide a link to the place they did come from.
 * I keep a watch on this site because, despite previous promises, people still take our content. There's nothing sinister or godfather-like about it - I'm simply protecting UESP's property.
 * Lastly, UESP has never engaged in acts of vandalism. One person who edited UESP made a few idiotic edits, but the reason it even became clear that it was a UESP editor was that a UESP admin did the research, found the link, apologized for the actions and made it clear to other editors that this was unacceptable. We do not condone vandalism in any shape or form. –rpeh•T•C•E• 08:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Like I said nobdy from the new community (as far as i'm aware) have stolen your content. If I'm wrong, sorry, please provide me with an example and I'll fix it. I'm sorry but if you don't care about those images why the hell did you bring it up? It's just caused even more bad blood. As for the vandalism, I've checked the history of the main page, and wether you openly condemned it or not, that person was acting for UESP. You say there is nothing sinister about it, yet you stalk members of our site and start an argument about something you say you don't even care about! Hardly healthy is it. I think it's time UESP accepted that the duration of your site and the size of it does not entitle you to anything. Arandil 08:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The reason I mentioned those images is that they are byte-for-byte identical to the ones on UESP. You're claiming that nobody in the so-called "new community" has copied images, but if they didn't come from UESP, where did they come from? The reason for bringing it up is to get an answer to that question and to make the point that we won't tolerate property theft.
 * The person concerned was not acting for UESP - don't be stupid. It was an individual acting on their own and who has since left the site. I'm not stalking anybody - I'm protecting our property. I'm also not claiming entitlement to anything.
 * If you want a healthy relationship, stop putting words in my mouth and don't copy our property. Then we'll get on just fine. –rpeh•T•C•E• 16:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)