Board Thread:Consensus track/@comment-4787430-20130809213148/@comment-5308644-20130824201202

TombRaiser wrote: He means that if we are trying to be consistent then we might as well have the category called "Bloodmoon: Destruction" or "Dragonborn: Destruction" if it appeared in the DLC, instead of labeling it from the main game. That's how I understood it.

I'm focused on how we use categories, and what populates them. "Morrowind: Destruction" lists spells in Morrowind that require Destruction skill. If we don't have equivalent Bloodmoon and Tribunal categories, then we will include expansion-only content that is not found in Morrowind, in Morrowind categories. Since we are supposed to be categorizing by game, I see this as erroneous, and disregarding the very foundation of our categorization system. But that is not the point, and if that's the approach we want to take I'll be fine with that.

My real point is that we should be consistent - either mix expansion-only content with parent game content, or keep it separate. Otherwise we're creating a subjective and irregular system that does both, based on opinion and judgment, rather than standards and consistency.