User talk:Emperor Jarjarkine


 * Welcome to my talkpage, ! Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
 * Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
 * Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
 * Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of asterisks '*'.
 * Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
 * To initiate a new conversation on this page [ click on this link].
 * You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes ( ~ ).
 * And, alway remember, keep you eyes to the sky traveler.

Talk Archives: Archive 1 / Archive 2 / Archive 3 / Archive 4 / Archive 5 / Archive 6 / Archive 7 / Archive 8

User Boxes
Are the user boxes giving you trouble? They look a little uneven like a few of them are not the same size.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 18:29, May 9, 2015 (UTC)


 * I saw that last night, Ill make sure to write down that we need to make sure all the boxes are the same size, see if this helps things any.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 18:36, May 9, 2015 (UTC)


 * Its looking good. I may update mine at some point, but Im always doing other things.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 19:47, May 9, 2015 (UTC)

Tsaesci
um... Why does Tsaesci a "Daggerfall: Image Needex" - mistake, or am I missing something important? Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 02:07, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * As for the Edittools, Edit Tools - I dont want to break it further, but if you know whats broken there, I will definitely fix it :) Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 02:16, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem lol. As for the EditTools -I try not to mess with them too much as I almost always break something Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 04:35, May 11, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Chat
Im in chat now, I hope you did not wait long.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 23:48, May 19, 2015 (UTC)

Guilds table
Hey, have you seen the Guilds page recently? The table with basic information about all the guilds is all messed up for some reason, do you know why? —Atvelonis (talk) 16:44, May 20, 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congratulations with your new role, if you still need to chat, I might be able to join in this evening. — Flightmare (talk) 17:20, May 26, 2015 (UTC)

RE: Calcelmo's Stone
Hello, Look at the Rosetta Stone here.

It's the same thing as Calcelmo's Stone, just a couple thousand years later, plus it has the same purpose and origin, though if that doesn't qualify, I can just undo my edit :p

FrenchTouch (talk)

Re:Interview
I'll answer the questions sometimes today or tomorrow. Starkiller131 (talk) 13:44, June 4, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Renaming of images
Yeah, the yellow is appearing fine. And thanks for letting me know about the code you're using, it will be good to finally have those file names fixed up. —Atvelonis (talk)

Re: Chat
Alright, I'm on chat now. —Atvelonis (talk) 02:46, June 22, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about the wait. I was out on business, but I have most of it done. Here is what I have so far. More can be added on to it.

MOOT

A Moot is a weekly meeting between users meant to efficiently discuss and vote on topics of importance.

PARTICIPATION

The Moot is open to all users, but there are different circumstances in which one can do so. Chat Rules apply and interfering with Moot procedure is grounds for kicking. Those who wish to bring up a topic must sign their names on the Moot page on the week they want to attend. It is an obligation to attend after signing. Those who wish to participate in discussio of the proposals and vote on them do not have to sign their names but may join any time. There is a certain standard to be expected from all participants, first and foremost to not interrupt the Moot Leader or those presenting a topic. Your time to speak will come at different points. Below are specific positions and placements of those wishing to partake in the Moot.

POSITIONS

Moot Leader--This is not a position of authority that reigns supreme, merely an overseer of the Moot to ensure it runs smoothly, and it involves a lot of responsibility. There are criterias to fit and rules to follow.

1) A Moot Leader is selected by a user volunteering themselves for the position during a specific meeting. The user must be an active member of the community and once they have their name down, the position is closed to others unless the name is removed. So it is a first come, first served basis we're working with.

2) A Moot Leader is required to speak at the Moot and must be present for the entire meeting. More on the details of their speaking later in PROCEDURE.

3) A Moot Leader who is not up to standard is subject to removal by majority vote. Once removed, the responisibility will pass to the Co-Moot Leader, and if the same result occurs, a vote will be taken to decide the new Moot Leader to ensure things still run smoothly.

4) The Moot Leader is barred from taking sides during a period of voting and must maintain complete neutrality.

Co-Moot Leader--Like the Moot Leader, there are certain responsibilities one must adhere to, but unlike the Moot Leader, they are not required unless special circumstances dictate.

1) Like the Moot Leader, anyone wishing to volunteer for the Co-Moot Leader position must sign up on the Moot page and is obligated to attend the entire meeting.

2) The Co-Moot Leader is treated as an average user who can weigh in on topics when allowed to speak unless the current Moot Leader is removed. If this occurs during a consensus and the Co-Moot Leader has cast a vote, it will become void when the Moot Leader position passes to them.

Madman97 (talk) 00:26, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

Here's more.

Presenter--The users who propose a topic to the audience.

1) As said before, they are obligated to attend the meeting and will speak in the order they are signed up. For example, if there are two spots open and 1) Bobby and 2) Robby--Bobby will go first and then Robby will go after.

2) They are only allowed to speak when designated by the Moot Leader. They will give their opening statements and provide a brief explanation of their proposal along with any additional information they deem necessary. When finished, they will let everyone know, and the Moot Leader will ask the audience to have a period of discussion. Once a proper consensus is reached, the Moot Leader will ask that everyone be silent and allow the next presenter to go.

3) The Presenter should be as clear and grammatically correct as possible. Respect for others is paramount. It is also recommended the proposal be told from a neutral perspective so the audience may draw their own conclusions without being first subjected to bias. The Presenter may discuss the topic with everyone else and cast a vote when designated by the Moot Leader. If the proposal goes on too long, the Moot Leader can call for a vote to end it to make room for others.

Spectator--The Average user that is watching the Moot but not proposing or volunteering as the Moot Leader.

1) Anyone can attend the Moot without signing their name but must wait until they are allowed to speak by the Moot Leader to give their opinion. All votes count, as do all opinions. Anyone who interrupts or creates tension will be removed by the Moot Leader.

Procedure is coming up next.

Madman97 (talk) 00:34, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Moot
Looks good. I think we the article could use some clean up, but it serves it uses. I may present a concern about how this will effect the weekly update, but for now I will write out a fourum and highlight it to let people know about this. Thanks to both you and Madman.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 06:30, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

Hey there. Going through the Moot Page again, I noticed that you have two sections devoted to Agenda and Attendance. You honestly have very little need for them on the Moot Page as there is already a section below it where those attending can sign and only for those who want to be Moot Leader, Co-Moot Leader, and Presenter. To my knowledge, CCC is not presenting or being a Moot Leader, so his name is unnecessary. If he shows up, he shows up as a spectator, therefore his name has no place on the Moot page. Also, the Agenda is unnecessary as well. Those who are presenting are required to write down their topic next to their name, so it's already laid out for you. If you planned on going over these things yourself, you cannot be the Moot Leader as it violates neutrality. If you want to be the Moot Leader, you better let me present them, or, CCC could be the Moot Leader and you could present. The Moot Leader cannot present. He is there to move things along by asking others to present.

We need to follow our own rules here, is my concern, and really, this will save you time and effort constantly updating the agenda or erasing names from past meetings when it's already laid out for you.

Madman97 (talk) 09:51, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

Here's another idea, one that may make a little more sense. It could be best that I am the Moot leader this first time because 1) I wrote the rules and am more familiar with them. From your adding of the Agenda and Attendence pages, it appears as if you are having trouble realizing the Moot basically organizes itself and that the Moot Leader is something that requires a solid standard. I should show others exactly how it should be done, but that's just my opinion. I'm not questioning your ability to be the Moot Leader; I just want to show you and everyone else exactly what goes on before jumping into another blind. 2) You've vastly improved from when you first came on here, but there is a bit of a language barrier. Clear grammar could make all the difference and some of your sentences can be hard to understand. That's relatively minor though compared with the first point however.

So you see my apprehension when you suggested the position of Moot Leader be permanent, but don't take it the wrong way. This is just a suggestion for how to make our project the best it can be.

Madman97 (talk) 10:04, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

Correction from one of my prior messages. I saw that CCC may present something on how the Weekly Moot may affect his Weekly Update. Even still, if that is the case, his name should find his way to the signup list of Presenters next to my name if I won't be Moot Leader this time.

Madman97 (talk) 10:06, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

Moot Questions
Hey sorry I didn't catch you sooner. I was busy. Just leave your questions on the talk pagw and I will answer them in turn.

Madman97 (talk) 05:35, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

RE:honored
It would take some work. The consensus was that only those who died got the honor. I think the absolute best of the best should be honored, but it would fall on how the community feels about it. Opening this door would also force us to be honest with who got this honor. We could not just give it to those who where popular, but who changed the wiki for the better, and that will be a great responsibility.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 03:42, June 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Chat
Alright Jarjar, I'm on chat now. —Atvelonis (talk) 03:53, June 27, 2015 (UTC)

Template:Jarl Advice
Hey, any ideas what to do with this template? It is one of yours and marked for deletion. http://elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Jarl_Advice

Cheatcodechamp (talk) 20:13, June 27, 2015 (UTC)

Someone already said they were doing the log. I think it was one of the Admins or UAM.

Madman97 (talk) 07:48, June 28, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Chat
On chat now. —Atvelonis (talk) 01:18, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

Editing My Page
Hello, just a quick request. Please don't edit my userpage without my explicit permission.

Have a nice day, 343 TheGuiltyProphet (talk) 12:15, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey man, no sweat. It's fine, I know you didn't do it with bad intent. Have a great day! 343 TheGuiltyProphet (talk) 15:39, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

Broken table
It seems the table on TES:Guilds is broken again, would you mind fixing it? —Atvelonis (talk) 02:28, July 2, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Moot
Ill make sure your presentation is moved to next week then. I am sorry you wont be here for it.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 22:06, July 4, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about chat
Sorry I missed you, I have been working on another wiki today, and when I was done moved to other things, forgetting about chat.

If you read our new forum, our Wiki intends to help some other wikis improve their content, So far its going well.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 07:12, July 7, 2015 (UTC)