User blog comment:Enda Kenny/The Civil Flame War : My Response/@comment-9062114-20130917223010

I'm going to try and say this as nicely as I can. But this was not well written at all. It was actually very biased and little to no evidence was presented to back up your opinions.

"The Stormcloaks obviously started the war, anyone who argues this is not looking hard enough".

The Stormcloaks were peaceful protestors at first, it was the Empire who attacked them. It's clear you've not done your research on who started the war. One of the Stormcloaks claims to have been attacked before 4e 201 the time where the war is supposedly "started" by Ulfric. Which means you're the one who's didn't look hard enough.

"I personally hate Ulfric, he is quite obviously power hungry and racist."

Again, you're the one who is not looking hard enough for anything. Ulfric has never once shown a sign of being power hungry. There is literally no evidence for this in game, yet you state it as if it's completely legitimate. Stuff like this makes your article lose credibility. And no, Ulfric is not racist either. I can go into further detail as to why if you would like.

"The Thalmor defeated the Empire in the Great War, accept that much. Titus Mede rejected the original WGC which was offered at the start of the Great War, choosing to fight. Only when defeated did the great man finally give in."

This is wrong again. The Dominion lost a huge army when the Empire took back the Imperial City. They lost even more when the Redgaurds beat both forces that attacked Hammerfell. This had to have taken a toll on the Dominion. They had basically goten all of their armies destroyed. They didn't beat the Empire, it was the other way around.

"Grow up and realize that violence solves nothing".

To be fair a lot of us are roleplaying and don't actually support violence or war. Such as myself.

This article as good as It could've been. Despite claiming to be against both sides you seem to clearly favour the Imperials. Or you only hold us Stormcloaks accountable for our argumens. That's not the best way to make a I dislike both sides kind of blog. Just a little constructive criticism. nothing personal.