Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-10789912-20151109180419/@comment-26017205-20151116183237

ShawnCognitionCP wrote:

I very clearly said I don't care if she is dead or not, as it doesn't concern the site. No part of any of our personal lives concerns the site. You cared enough to bring it up in the OP. If you had any clue, you would have omitted any mention of her personal life and simply stated that "This admin has been absent for 3 years and based ON THAT ALONE she should be de-admined."

Anyone who brings her personal life into in, as a way for her to keep OR lose her rights, is not only wrong but acting on emotion, which never works on a wiki.

ShawnCognitionCP wrote:

''It is accepted widely by the community that she is dead. That is why this thread uses that. The last two threads on this subject did not fail because of a lack of support, but rather because people had an issue removing the rights of someone they thought was dead. A funerary thread was brought up after the previous one, and it was met with mass support, but no one ever got around to it. I state very clearly that she could be dead, alive, or careless, and it does not matter at all to the site.'' This community has no right to "decide" if a person who suffering from cancer is alive or dead. So this wiki does CTs on people's personal lives too? That's disgusting.

ShawnCognitionCP wrote:

You and Bluesonic1 are simply keeping to your style, and meddling in matters you do not understand Top kek. Teach me your ways, oh wise wiki master.