Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131019012335/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131024150923

218.186.253.91 wrote: The Daedra (literally "not our ancestors") are defined by "did not participate in the creation of Mundus". So, even if Jyggalag was pure Anu blood, he can still be a daedra and so a daedric prince, by the above definition. It will NOT be wrong to call Akatosh a daedra if he did not partake in creation and it is wrong to call Molag Bal a daedra if he DID partake in creation. I think the part about all DPs coming from pure padomaic blood might actually be wrong, even if the lore suggests such, because a spirit born from anu or anu and padomay could still not partake in the creation of Mundus, which would fit the definition of a daedric prince. Also, malacath, previously trinimac, is probably aedric, so he was not pure padomay blood. '''Also, If Jyggalag came from padomay, it will be a huge lore violation, as he is practically the embodiment of stasis itself, as order, the opposite of entropy. In fact, the other DPs could be biased against him because he was the only one of pure Anu blood and that could also be the reason of his power. ''' This is pure speculation, not hard truth. If you disagree, it is OK Exactly! Jyggalag being born from the full blood of Padomay would be lore-breaking as he is order and stasis. Brilliant post 218.186.253.91. I would give Kudos to it if I could.