Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-10993011-20130618024431/@comment-173.76.49.67-20181027214123

Pink Slim wrote: Legate Alexandros wrote: What Nait said, but that exactly how I was planning to have the next dlc progressing. A lot of thing within the story, suggested of Dragonborn association with Talos. Even the ghost at old Hroldan belived that you were Hialti, which... no offense, but personally I don't like it. I don't like the thought of the dragonborn becoming emperor, and doing to the thalmor what they did to the empire isn't going to make you a good guy.

If I made a DLC/Mod quest line, I'd make Balgruuf become the Emperor, I mean either way he sides with the empire, if the stormcloaks win they kick him out and he leaves with the empire, if the empire wins he becomes a leader figure. plus if the stormcloaks win and he becomes emperor then they might actually try to come to some agreement with a nord that knows how they feel. and he me it seemd like he may have been leaning towards the stormcloaks, until Galmar and Ulfric decided that his stance was too defensive. I think that Alexia Vici (like someone else said, because she is related to Titus Mede II), Elisif, Amaund Motierre, possibly the Dragonborn if worst comes to worst, or Balgruuf like you said. I don't think Ulfric should rule anything (I may be a bit biased because I play as a dark elf) because he would wage a lot of war and end up being a lot worse than Pelagius the Mad, Potema, and Jagar Tharn.