Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-26896471-20151024220202

Wulfharth wrote: I'm not going to talk about the possible sockpuppet, because apparently wikia confirmed it matched via Tim. And if that indeed is the case, then 1 year ban is normal.

Instead I'll make a point on how he behaves. Even though I have had words with him prior, I can say without bias its very apparant by looking at his past behaviour on CTs and talk pages, that Sajuuk has a huge problem when people don't agree with him. And when they don't, he insults them openly in the chat. Again, this is not bias - it raw, documented fact. And this is what led to the initial ban of 2 weeks.

Lets be clear - I'm not one for "safe spaces" and all that other SJW bullshit, but when you're actively insulting contributers of the wiki by calling them "useless" or "whiny bitch", then something needs to be done. Attack people's bad ideas, and not them.

Now from my understanding, he has recieved several warnings and bans in the past over the same thing....and this is yet another one. Its pretty obvious he doesn't want to follow the wiki rules and drama seems to constantly occur when he talks (and not just on this wiki). If that's how he is, then a longer ban is 100% warranted. Its normal practice on countless wikis. 3 strikes and you're out. Sajuuk is probably on strike 7.

It's irrelevant if he is active on CTs and has helped out the wiki in the past. If Timeoin did the same thing, I'd say the same about him.

TL;DR: Even if that was not a sockpuppet, a longer ban is still 100% warranted based on his history. You have just turned this into a personality thing. You are saying he should be banned even if proven innocent. I'm sorry, but personal dislike is no reason to block someone, Wulf.