Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150415101511/@comment-26197005-20150421192417

SuperSajuuk wrote:

Also, I like how Nomar just wrote something totally irrelevant that could be constituted as "ad hominem" for no reason in his post. Not sure why people are able to get away with just blatantly attacking me when they don't like my opinion but it's a discussion for another day. Comment —  SuperSajuuk  it is not your opinion which I do not like, it is as I stated, the way that you reply to every contrary opinion to your own. Nor is this argumentum ad hominem, as I am not refuting your position on the basis of who your are or your character in any way. In fact, as I said, I believe it is a needed change for security reasons. But, it is none the less valid that as the person proposing the vote it is inappropriate for you to attempt to invalidate veiws contrary to your own. Therefore, it is not irrelevant to the subject at hand. You complain of being attacked, yet you attacked DarthOrk's position. You say that I attacked you without reason, yet I gave my reason's exactly. You have validated them.

If required, I can provide examples of this, although simply reading through this thread should be sufficent. As a ranking member of the wiki, your behavior is reflective of the wiki. I call upon you to live up to that requirement.

Harold Burned-Mane   makes the argument that your position is tu quoque. He may well be correct.

Perhaps you are correct, this discussion needs to be held elsewhere. It is a conversation that may need to be had indeed.

Nomar, the Nomarian