Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-26896471-20151029223854

CynicalEarth wrote: Wulfharth wrote: That's one thing funny thing I've noticed. He always asks people to join him off-site to have these super secret convos about wiki happenings, instead of using talk pages or in public - even before this ban. Well, isn't this adorable. Probably discussing how to debunk every argument we put out and pressure us into a vote.

Almost worked.

The block is staying, end of the line. Timeoin received confirmation.

Future arguments shall be ignored -- the majority has last say. Quotes like this worry me. As do ones attempting to slander people trying to put forward an alternative point of view.

You say: "The majoirty has the last say." What I've actuallly seen from the majority here, is a willingness to listen, and, as quotes like Ser Pouce and Madman show, a willingness to wait for decisive evidence. As it stands, all we have is hearsay.

"Future arguments shall be ignored" is genuinely slightly saddening, and  I trust that the majority are willing to consider both sides. This is not an open and shut case. I have known Sajuuk for a very short period of time, as have Crusader and Ottoman Hold. We must not let bias stand in the way of a reasonable outcome, here.