Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4544033-20150322005151/@comment-11345660-20150322163631

I'm not sure where I stand on this. While I like the the idea of prefixes, I do think that some experienced lore masters should form a guild. At the same time, I think that could be a seriou cause for error if they miss several key things while editing. This is also another minor suggestion when it comes to the Kirkbride lore, as I think there is a bit of a bias on both sides that accept it and the side that doesn't, is that if it has to be included with the page, it should be listed as such and should be listed as a theory rather than the full nine yards. And I do think there are more lore masters here than just Shawn and Pelinal. A lot of people here know more than a thing or two about the lore. Give us some credit. Check out our old debates from two years ago if you need proof.

@Sajuuk:

"It's also been stated that a guild is pointless and will have no effect, as we have 2-3 lore masters. If "people watching over this" is a problem, then get more patrollers instead of holding back on not promoting anyone."

I hope you understand we can't just promote people willy-nilly to solve a problem. We already had that particular crisis just recently. We need to make sure they are up to the task first. And I know you're passionate about the improvement of the wiki--I've seen it firsthand--but swearing isn't really necessary, even if you are losing you're patience. It doesn't exactly grant you the warrant of authority needed when trying to effectively argue a point. Strong wording damages credibility, and therefore make people think you're just a raging monger.