User talk:Rupuzioks/Archive 3

Re:Tribute Chest Key
Done, thanks.—CarloV3r (talk) 16:04, July 31, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Wanted Files
Sure, no problem. Thanks for all the hard work!—CarloV3r (talk) 12:03, August 12, 2017 (UTC)

Karstaag Resists1
Is the name of this spell actually Karstaag Resists1, or is the "1" a typo? Oh, and congrats on getting the Akatosh badge! —Atvelonis (talk) 01:06, August 17, 2017 (UTC)


 * Interesting, well if that's the name in the Construction Set then that clears it up. Keep up the good work! —Atvelonis (talk) 14:42, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Sandbox (Morrowind)
Hey Rupuzioks, I definitely don't mind if you make corrections to my templates and stuff I'm working on. You just saved me about 30 minutes of trying to figure out where I messed up. Huge thanks.

Characters in ESO
Alright, I have a question for you - what should be done with Characters (Online)? Because having 11,000 characters would be rather excessive :) Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 09:34, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * That may work :) Timeoin•Say G'Day•View my work 10:05, August 25, 2017 (UTC)

Article Pictures
I've noticed that you updated the Sea Viper pictures? I'd like to thank you for that, as I have been working on editing and creating the Factions pages. If you were to improve the articles through adding pictures to them, that would be great! You don't have to do it if you don't want to, bu if you're willing, do feel free to do so. Cheers!

--  Aquila2002   //   Message   //   Chat   //  


 * Ah, I see. Well, thanks for the fixes anyhow. It's not easy editing entire factions. Cheers for the input!

--  Aquila2002   //   Message   //   Chat   //  

Re:Template: Username
Hey Rupuzioks,

First off, I want to sincerely apologize. When I saw Flightmare's message, I didn't notice that you had left me a talkpage message as well. I'm only just now noticing as Timeoin sent me a message. I will message Flightmare with this information and see what he can do. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, I wasn't sure why exactly it had happened and I know some users liked using the template. Again, sorry about not replying sooner. The Crusader of Truth (talk – chat) 00:07, September 4, 2017 (UTC)

Ariella Septim
Hey Rupu,

I saw you add Ariella Septim to the Septim Dynasty page, but when I clicked on the reference (on her page), it said that the page was not found. I don't know if you created the page or not, but if you did, do you know what the proper link is?

Thanks Blademaster Jauffre (talk) 15:13, September 10, 2017 (UTC)

Template stuff
Hey, just hop in chat for a moment. I think it'd be easier to discuss the problem there. The Crusader of Truth (talk – chat) 17:53, September 12, 2017 (UTC)


 * Everything looks good, minus one problem – Shivering Isles is an expansion pack not a DLC, which means that it doesn't use the xx, aka DLC ID. It's really weird I know. I can go back and correct the ID changes. Just something to keep in mind for the future. And thanks, by the way. Being sick sucks. The Crusader of Truth (talk – chat) 22:36, September 12, 2017 (UTC)


 * The main issue is that Oblivion uses a different system than everything else, and I'm not sure if that's a bad thing or not. The temporary solution I made for it (Template:Potions and Template:Potions2) seems to work fine for now, although if I'm blind and some pages are still messed up don't be afraid to point it out anyway. I asked the other staff what they think about the situation, and what we should do. If they're still unsure, then we can either discuss how to fix it in the moot or on a thread. Right now at least everything works fine, and all of the data is coming up properly for readers to see, which is by far the main concern I had. Thanks for helping out with it, yesterday wasn't a good day for me. The Crusader of Truth (talk – chat) 21:44, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

Question
You have access to the Construction Kit for Skyrim, right? If you do can you confirm the Base ID for Anuriel? A user pointed out that it was wrong. I changed it to the base ID they said it was,, which they said they got from looking at other sites. Originally it said was her base id. Thank you The Cat Master (talk) 16:33, September 14, 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Cheers The Cat Master (talk) 16:55, September 14, 2017 (UTC)

Re:An Explorer's Guide to Skyrim
I'm beginning to wonder if I make too many mistakes to be patroller lol.

Okay, since I was wrong the first time I guess I need to ask to be sure. If it's randomized loot, shouldn't it be removed, since there's no way of knowing what book it is? The Crusader of Truth (talk – chat) 15:02, September 16, 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism reporting
Hey Rup. Um, I just wanted to ask how is that anon vandalizing? I checked some of the edits and it seems to me they were just trying to change the images. Can you explain how it's vandalism? Thanks. Starkiller131 (talk) 13:28, September 17, 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but that anon doesn't deserve too be reported, unless, of course he actually vandalizes. If anything he should be informed of his mistakes so he can try and edit better. Starkiller131 (talk) 13:38, September 17, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Request
That image has been restored. Cheers The Cat Master (talk) 14:47, September 19, 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi :) Thanks a lot for your answer :)

 Harleen ❯❯❯ FoE wiki ADMIN | ⎘ | ☎ 8:11, September 23, 2017 (UTC)

Structure
Cheers for that!

--  Aquila2002   //   Message   //   Chat   //  

Re: Unused Image
Thanks for pointing that out, I didn't remember I uploaded it. Also, thanks for helping out reverting the anon edits. The Crusader of Truth (talk – chat) 10:28, October 2, 2017 (UTC)

Atvelonis has approved this
Why else would he be directly linking to this site from UESP?? 202.173.162.168 09:35, October 4, 2017 (UTC)

UESP
Actually, it IS the official source for things. Even Zenimax Online Studios have said so. Maybe you should join Atvelonis over there? 202.173.162.168 09:40, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * I will leave the changes for now, but I will confirm this with the staff, because I don't know who you are, you could just be spamming. But if it is allowed then sorry for the reverts. --Rupuzioks (talk) 09:47, October 4, 2017 (UTC)


 * Its Timeoin, (AUS IP) and he's vandalizing the wiki again... Wulfharth (talk) 13:11, October 4, 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the reverts and for watching Recent Changes. You've been doing the right thing. Regards,

Bronkiin (talk) 11:35, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. --Rupuzioks (talk) 11:52, October 4, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Letter of Inheritence image
I took care of it. Thanks for pointing that out. The Cat Master (talk) 16:57, October 11, 2017 (UTC)

In regards to editing certain Daedric Prince pages
Dear Rupuzioks,

Firstly, I thank you for the welcome, and hope to do well here.

Secondly, I wish to ask if it would be proper of me to make edits to some of the pages on Daedric Princes, such as Jyggalag and Meridia. They would be to expand a little more on them, and clarify some minor things (the description of Jyggalag as being "metalic" is a personal bother, but it is nonetheless inacurate), to try and bring their pages as close as reasonable possible, using the information avaliable about them, to the likes of Molag Bal's page. Since the Princes are subjects of conjecture, I did not feel right with going ahead without informing an admin, and direct consent would calm my nerves in that regard, and be very much appreciated.

It would seem that Aramithius is revising the main Daedra Lord page, so that particular page is not as large of a concern to me currently.

Also, I wanted to ask if there was a particular desicion that lead to the seperation of Molag Bal and Meridia's information from their apperances in Elder Scrolls Online. I do not doubt that there is a reason, but I do not know it. I also wanted to know if some of the images of the Princes should be replaced with their actual apperances, as Molag and Meridia have known physical apperances but their images are of their shrines.

Whenever you can reply, and whatever you reply, I appreciate it.

Thank You,

Den Éna Faskómilos

Den Éna Faskómilos (talk) 04:02, October 20, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Images with Unknown Source
That's one of the images on Elchzard's archive: those are usually stored there because while they do have a functional use on the wiki, Special:UnusedFiles will show them as not being placed on any page, which is misleading. Judging from the title it's used somewhere on the MonoBook skin, so it probably shouldn't be deleted. Reverse image search doesn't come up with any results for it either, so I suppose he probably took the screenshot himself. —Atvelonis (talk) 17:32, November 5, 2017 (UTC)


 * Well it doesn't hurt to keep the category just in case anyone wants to put No source in a file description in the future, the same way we keep the Deletion Candidates category even though it periodically becomes empty. If anything it might be helpful to just use the category more for images with no licensing templates and whatnot. —Atvelonis (talk) 17:54, November 5, 2017 (UTC)

Hey
Hello,

Don't believe we've met before, I was on here a year ago making a lot of large-scale changes, and I intend to do the same this time round. Is there anything I can do with helping you fill out the Legends pages?

15:22, November 18, 2017 (UTC)

Great! I'll see what I can do then. - 15:28, November 18, 2017 (UTC)

Have a sweetroll
I was about to upload images for the new items on the Merchandise page today, and noticed you already took care of it. Thank You! :) The Cat Master (talk) 18:10, November 28, 2017 (UTC)

Legends card stuff
Heya, would you mind formatting all the card types (Action, Creature, etc.) into some form of table on each page (as on the Cards page), or at least list out the examples of the cards? Right now there seems to be somewhat of a lack of centralized info on them and I don't exactly have the time right now to do it myself. It should also be made more clear that creatures are a genuine card type, not an arbitrary distinction (original line of thought was misleading guesswork: "it looks like an animal, not a character," because at the time we knew nothing about card types) influenced by our existing (or former, hopefully) propensity to slap a Skyrim-centric categorization system on everything (which was what we semi-mistakenly did when we originally set up the category last year). So if you can handle that, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! —Atvelonis (talk) 11:44, November 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * Gotcha, no rush. You're doing great work, you can certainly take your time if you need it. :) —Atvelonis (talk) 16:02, November 29, 2017 (UTC)

Card Art
Hey Rup!

First of all, great job on all your edits, I see your name quite often in the wiki activity screen, and you're pretty damn good at the things you do.

Now, as for my topic. I saw you created the Phalanx Exemplar Card page a couple of days ago. I was wondering, do you know how to get just the cart art? Like no attributes or something. As an example with the A Land Divided Cart, like this:

If you know how to do that, please, let me know, I'd greatly appreciate the card art for Phalanx Exemplar!

Happy editing, Blademaster Jauffre (talk) 16:58, November 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * Would you be willing, if you come across it, to send me the card art of Phalanx Exemplar? If you come across it?
 * I'd be most grateful.
 * Blademaster Jauffre (talk) 17:27, November 29, 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you.
 * Blademaster Jauffre (talk) 20:22, November 29, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Destruction Ritual Spell
Sure, I'll add a note about it in the lead. —Atvelonis (talk) 16:56, December 3, 2017 (UTC)

Legends again
I wanted to bring up again the subject of the "Characters" category. As I see, most cards from Clockwork City with named characters are called "creatures" in the Type line, like Galyn the Shelterer. Besides that, there is a lot of old card pages with named characters still having "character" in the Type line, like Young Dragonborn. So, the question is, what should the character category mean? Personally, I'd like to have this category annexed intirely. There is an alternetive: only named creatures should be called "Characters", all other will remain as it is. By the way, if you decide that we should get rid of the Character category, I think that even the Creature category may need to be overhauled a bit. The Dawnbreaker (Legends) has a text Undead: Includes Mummy, Skeleton, Spirit and Vampire, yet the code word "Creature" also includes these species, which means that being an "Undead" doesn't mean that a card is not a "Creature". Also that a Creature in Legends means a card that has health and power stats and can be summoned to the battleground. I think it can be fixed by replacing all Undeads with the Creature type, and write in the Undead (Legends) that the following creatures can be destroyed by Dawnbreaker, since it's the only card that collect these species into a single type. The same thing with Animals. DreamSoulshine (talk) 19:15, December 3, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Template: ConfirmBug
Hmm, I didn't know that template existed. In general we shouldn't be recording fixes from the Unofficial Patch. The popup itself appears on mobile and is able to adequately get the message across, but the text that appears when you roll over the popup does not work. I don't think there's much of a reason to use the template. —Atvelonis (talk) 17:02, December 5, 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for fixing that bit on the sandbox, i have no idea how to make an article link in the first place, so i just tried to give it a shot and hope for the best.Frytuurchef (talk) 15:58, December 11, 2017 (UTC)