Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-82.30.53.52-20130707190543/@comment-202.156.8.15-20131027075543

I wrote that statement because sombody said that Lorkhan was an in between, neither aedra or daedra. To be a daedra or aedra is NOT a false dichotomy (there is no spectrum, you can either be part of creation or not be part of it, the amount you contibute is not important). I still don't understand how is "not our ancestors" (you know what I mean) has anything to do with blood. Its probably pure coincidence if true. Also, in the akatosh example, how do you call one who DOES NOT participate in creation an "ancestor"? The who participated in creation theory makes much more sense than the Anu/Padomay blood theory. The lore is self contradictory in this case.