Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-10789912-20151109180419/@comment-1738746-20151116005023

The fact that this has already been a CT twice which has passed with the same result tells you quite clearly what the community thinks about the situation. I'm actually quite disgusted that the admins think this is ok to leave up and not even make mention of all the comments you're making Shawn, which are based on assumptions. Wulfharth is right, this is all extremely distasteful. As someone who was regularly editing on wikis and then had to leave for 2-3 years due to my own health reasons, if I saw something like this I would be very upset. On my wiki, the admins left me my tools. Did anyone get hurt because of it? Did the wiki itself suffer because of it? No. And when I came back, I spoke to the other admins to catch up before doing anything, and I trust considering Grams' experience, they would do the same. I really can't believe there's talk of a funerary thread when we don't even know Grams' situation, disgusting. People survive cancer plenty of times, I have family members who did. If I came back to the wiki to find that some user was spreading false information about my death in order to convince them that removing my tools was the right thing to do, I'd be very angry.

Just like you said to me on the last weekly update thread; it's just tools. On an inactive account. It's not even on a page that matters. You're taking this way too hard. It's pretty low, actually.

We make exceptions to policy all the time for the most trivial crap, I think we can make an exception for a really great editor who didn't have a choice in leaving us. Actually, we already did make the exception- TWICE. My vote stays as oppose, just as it was in both the last CTs.