Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150325130621/@comment-1251315-20150325214207

G0LD3NF1RE wrote: My though is that we could still keep the limit at 25, before moving it to archive and exception being if its really old, as with Ser Pouce-a-lot's case. But's that rather counterproductive. As I explained, we can't just have a hard limit and then an exception that makes the limit pointless.

Frankly, it's not within our duty to go around determining things like this, we should just let users decide for themselves, people have brains and I'm pretty sure people will know when they need to be archived: they don't need to be told exactly when they can archive.

If someone wants to create a bunch of small archives, who are we to question it, other than point out to the user that they should try to keep archives concise instead of spread across multiple? o.O