Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-10197675-20130806142227/@comment-218.186.252.200-20131230120610

Sorry, but when MK left Bethesda, all he writes are pretty much predictions and postulations, based on inferring the lore that already exists. I am not discrediting MK in any way, but using preexisting lore in no way creates new lore, it only creates a theoretical model prediction. Since MK did write much of Beth's lore, what he writes, assuming he's not trolling (I am pretty sure some of his documents are pure trolling, because people are prone to such irrational acts) is a part truth, based on what he already knows, like a blind man (who knows everything in the world) picturing how something might look like through people telling him, without seeing anything. However, just because his writing might or might not coincide with Beth's ideas and storyline, it cannot be fully credited or discredited as canon. Whatever Beth knows is the true lore, whatever MK writes is just his inferences to the best of his ability.

That's why, do not believe what MK writes, but do not diss it either.