Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26896471-20151004010902/@comment-26896471-20151009155645

Bluesonic1 wrote: You can't consider the "I don't care" option in polls- it is there as the neutral option which can signify a range of things as opposed to just "I can attend any time you choose". It could be people who don't usually attend moots voting that because of exactly that, they never attend moots and don't care as a result, as an example.

We made this thread and this poll so people could voice their opinions on changing the time. If the users you spoke to are so keen to see the moot moved back 6 hours, then let them vote and be the majority. As it stands though, they're not. And as it stands, the moving it 4/4+ hours back and keeping it the same are tied, excluding the people voting for a forward time because I won't assume they can attend the current time though it's extremely likely they won't be able to attend a time moving it back. Your numbers are flawed. The option is "I don't mind as to the time". That means they are free whenever. Trying to claim otherwise is really clutching at straws. And please read my post before telling me my numbers are flawed. I told you that my vote should be placed elsewhere thus making it five. Not including those who don't mind when the Moot is frankly strange.

But Sajuuk is right in saying that the poll is not useful (hence you shouldn't be giving it as much importance as you are). Another thread might be made saying that the Moot will be moved earlier by six hours, and asking if anyone have any major objections to this. I like that idea.