Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140825123912/@comment-4544033-20140828201345

The level of vandalism we have doesn't call for a "code red" bot. Wiki awnsers locked down once, but they are extremely understaffed to a point less then 30% of their questions are answered. It has also been some time since we where attacked by a bot or a group of vandals. Seeing as that is not a problem. We have three options as to handle our current level's of vandalism.


 * We take away Anon rights, this option is rather extreme given the good faith philosophy and our rather low level of vandalism. This may help with a part of the problem, but not enough to justify it.


 * We promote at least one new admin. I would encourage we do not pick one in haste, an Admin has the most power rights besides Wiki Staff and should be trusted with those rights.  We have been saying we are understaffed so I am surprised I haven't heard of nominations yet.


 * We do nothing, We are doing this now, except we are masking it with a conversation that at this point is fixing nothing and has caused anger and hurt feelings among the contributors. We need to talk about our problems, but not to a point where people are getting warnings and bans.