Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4787430-20140222001935/@comment-4057437-20140317024628

Flightmare wrote:

TombRaiser wrote: If we had gone by the timetable Spey had in mind, then Timeoin and Deyvid would no longer be in a staff position, since they have been gone for more than 3 months during 2012-2013, and they did eventually come back to resume their duties. Rules like these can't be retro-active.

That's not what Timeon was saying. The point was that other people have had periods of inactivity longer than a couple of months without there being any problems caused by it when they resumed their activity.

The point is that 3 months inactivity is not long enough to justify a change in an admin's status.