Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-13417807-20130726023954/@comment-25323290-20140826061108

Alright boys and girls. Your flaws in this argument absolutely horrify me and I ask you all to step back whilst you allow me to explain and elabourate on this.

Let's start with the Altmer, who themselves are not bad. However, you can't expect many people to like your race because your race allowed a bunch of extremists (the Thalmor) to run your darned province, believing that "Elven supremacy is the only way." I personally like the Altmer, but when your race is being brainwashed to think that they are the future, I don't think things are going to go well for your argument.

Now let's have a look at the Nords, who are normally peaceful and kind. However, they have a large rebellion filled them. They tarnish their reputation by banishing equality and resenting those who are of mer blood or are beastfolk. Look at this, and then explain how this is any better than the Thalmor. You may say that this is not Ulfric's doing and it is simply the soldier's personal opinions, but with the mass numbers of the racists in his cohorts you would expect Ulfric to take action. But no.

The Imperials aren't bad either, but for those who have only played Skyrim they are apparently horrible as well. Why? Because an emperor who isn't even of the dragon-blood (Titus Mede II) signed a treaty which made the Nords angry.

The Argonian Empire isn't specifically too bad. But like all empires, they did something wrong and had revenge on the Dark Elves, enslaving them and taking much of their homeland to show ithe elves what they did to them. That is still not good.

Who in this argument is correct?

No one.

No one in the current days of the Fourth Era have had an empire that believed in a cause and stuck to it. I have yet to see a truely correct cause in the present day, and I hope that you agree with my words.