Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-25075055-20140616212248/@comment-1251315-20140626172152

Deyvid Petteys wrote: It is standard policy on the wiki to vote anyone out of their current staff position. This will not be circumvented based on inactivity. That disrupts the very structure of this wiki. Since there are only two active bureaucrats at present, I highly doubt any of these demotions will occur without consensus. I absolutely will not.

colored names help new users locate staff members. I have always advocated the use of bright, contrasting colors, and I have not found a persuasive argument countering my philosophy on this to date. Obviously didn't read the post, too interested in writing a reply. If you actually read my post, I made it clear that coloured names are staying. >_>

And there's no reason to vote people out of their position when they are so obviously inactive that they disappeared years ago. Or are you telling me that they'll just appear out of nowhere and defend themselves when a thread is made to ask they have their rights updated? >_>