Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140808194933/@comment-12.23.90.195-20140810002934

Draevan13 wrote: RobinHood70 wrote: Coming at this from the outside, I find this entire thread laughable in its prejudice against Jimeee based largely on hearsay about conversations that took place in private. I've looked at the evidence presented, myself, and I can see quite clearly that there are two sides to this story. This CT is premature and the motivations for it seem a little bit suspicious to me.

Pelinal Whitestrake wrote: ...going in and claiming that it's somekind of feud is something you can't do. That sounds rather suspiciously like suppressing evidence. If this thread started as the result of some kind of feud or vendetta, that's very relevant to the case at hand, all the more so if there's any suggestion that the OP is meat-puppeting. The fact that undesirable replies are now being removed, many of which were quite on topic, really tells me everything I need to know here. Only one "oppose" reply was removed, and it was removed by the opposer himself, not the OP. All other removed comments were off-topic or personal insults directed at one person or another. I disagree (as several of my comments were removed). One was removed justly, I'll admit. A second was removed that outlined my reasons why Jimeee didn't overstep his bounds, which is entirely on topic. The last one removed I tried to explain why the second one was on-topic and should not have been removed. I don't see how the second two should have been removed.