Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-209.7.3.188-20160303204000/@comment-7371906-20160307184906

Blademaster Jauffre wrote: TheBlackOmen wrote: Blademaster Jauffre wrote: Wulf only said he didn't know how much longer the''' Emperor will hang on. He even specifically said ''So is the whole Empire, for that matter. Getting old that is. 'He doesn't say the Empire won't hang on for much longer, he is specifically talking about the Emperor.

Other than that your reasoning for the fall of an Empire make no sense. Exept if you read past the first two sentences you would find he also said  " The Emperor and the legions have held the Empire together for hundreds of years. It's been a good thing, by and large. But maybe it's time for a change. " he is not only specificaly talking about just the Emperor but the whole Empire he is talking about a preminition on how thr Empire is old in will be changed which is what is happening now as it is losing relevance. He says 'The EMPEROR and the LEGIONS '''have held the Empire together for hundreds of years. IT'S BEEN A GOOD THING, by and large. But maybe it's time  for a CHANGE. This CHANGE means a change in who rules, which has happened, Ocato, a Potentate, ruled, after which a new dynasty ruled.'''

I won't even adress the rest, seeing as how filled it is with lies. And you don't think the change in rule could also be a change of government, structure and ruler as shown happen many times in the past especially during the Interregnum. Sure do what you want it sure doesn't help you're argument.