Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-11276487-20130713025241/@comment-11345660-20130919025529

Heheh, now was that so freaking hard? To list down all the sources? To give out all the quotes?

Listen, I respect your undertaking and research into this theory. In fact, I was alway's for it. It's just I need Absolute proof of it other than just speculation taken by in game scholars and books. Unless someone of a reliable source, such as a Deity or someone of that nature or maybe even the Dwemer if we ever see them again, says that Lorkhan was Akatosh, then F***ing fine, he was Akatosh. But I still need definitative proof. No matter how much you delve into this, no matter how reasonable it sounds, it's not going to fly until I see it the game. If your right, then congratulations. If your wrong or if I havn't seen it yet, this theory will just continue to be a theory.

Again, I have nothing against it. I applaude you for being passionate about it. But again, I am afraid you won't convince me without proof. I am sorry, but for thing of this nature, I can only speculate.

Also, dude that's a f***ing dragon Akatosh shrine. It has wings and it has the head of a dragon. It doesn't have arms or legs because that's how its designed. But seriously, and I think most people would agree. It's a dragon dude. Also, a lot of those passages make no sense. I think you are connecting dots with invisible lines.

Also, true, the Developers word is Law. IF it's in the game. What if they say there is no Skyrim? It's law. But why does it exist? THey take the developers words and put them into the game for a reason. And we know there is things East of Mordor because it's actually in the books. And George Lucas directed the Prequils, so I think all of his word went out the window.