Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-17087283-20131214225450/@comment-89.245.200.206-20131216152329

Jimeee wrote: 89.245.247.230 wrote: I know, I'm just a wikia contributor without an account, but I agree with you. On the Bethesda forum, almost everyone says that this wiki is bad because of reasons like "lore is inaccurate in the Elder Scrolls Wiki" or like "They ignore MK". I think that a relatively accurate page about CHIM would really help to make the reputation of this wiki a little bit better. Maybe even something about Amaranth or Enatiomorph. Absolutely right. I browse a few different lore forums, and this wiki's rep is lower than dirt for lore discussions. Pages about MK lore might help as its an area that UESP doesn't really cover - p.provided it is accurate and fully referenced. Have you seen the page on The Towers?

P.S. You're not "just" a wiki contributer - anon users can be just as helpful as registered users.

I've seen that page and it seems accurate, though the Towers are one of the more "simple" concepts MK invented. A page about the Enatiomorph concept would already be a start. After that, pages about CHIM and Amaranth could be written. The only really important thing is that the pages need to be as accurate as possible.