Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131113224543/@comment-160529-20140101221525

Octo8 wrote: Yes, because we're talking about ecclestial laws here! Certainly! Makes perfect sense! Has Sheogorath blessed you or what's the matter? God damn...

But you certainly do seem to have an ecclestial mindset: Kirkbridge should not be considered canon, because that would be misinforming people, because his works aren't canon.... perfect circular logic. Your entire post is trying to argue that MK's work is non-canonical by pre-assuming his work is non-canonical. THAT is a fallacy in fact: Assuming the antecedent. All your arguiments only work if you assume already BEFORE that MK's works are not canon; hence they are not valid arguments at all.

Also I didnt use taht arguement at all by the way.

my arguement is simple, Kirkbride does not work for bethesda, thus none of his unsanctioned works should be considered canon, adn thus informing people of his non-canonical work owuld be wrong. That is the simple logic here.

there is absolutely nothing here resembling circular logic, I started from a fact... Kirkbride does not work at bethesda.