Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-9601450-20131225183646/@comment-67.171.74.199-20140719203910

"Used by many gamers" is not the same as "ordinary". The example you used is absurdly overpowered, and cannot be called ordinary by any stretch of the imagination. If you seriously think that 60 damage is underwhelming, I fear for your sanity. There is, to my knowledge, not a SINGLE weapon in the base game of Skyrim that does 60 damage. Furthermore, a weapon that does any more than perhaps 55 damage is very iffy. Please remember, this is supposed to mimic the games there have been so far! This is not intended for powerplayers only! I really don't know what to say to you at this point. Furthermore, 'sentiment has no place in a world of war'? Seriously? Do you have no respect for historical artifacts? And before you dismiss respecting historical artifacts as pointless dithering and emotional attatchment, I would like to show you something. It is called the entire field of archaeology.

To sum it up, you appear to be proposing that these artifacts become massively, rabidly overpowered - not as overpowered as that crazy contrast example you included, given, but still utterly nuts - and then justifying it by saying that the (already far more powerful than anything in the base game of Skyrim, which I would not want to surpass, because again, Towers is supposed to be a serious new game, not some kind of powerplay playground where you can merrily slaughter trolls and giants every other day before breakfast) artifacts I suggested are way underpowered - in comparison to a weapon that does literally hundreds of damage points!

I don't know what to say. This makes so little sense, it is hurting my brain.

- WorshipsMeridia