Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-11345660-20130908095939/@comment-7153552-20130909231257

I'm not argueing that they are animals or that we are, I'm not "argueing" at all to be honest, I just don't agree with the conotation you are implying when you call them animals. If you meant something other than what I inferred, I apologize. I, too, apologize if you took offense, that was not my purpose. I suppose it is possible that I missread what you intended to say, but it seemed to me as though you were cutting the Argonians and Khajiit off as being little more than trained monkeys. In my eyes, they are Man first and Beast second, Manbeasts just doens't roll off the toung as easily as Beastmen. Also, the terminology we have for them comes directly from the Men and Mer, who spent years degrading them, the Dunmer even more by keeping them as slaves long after slavery was done away with in the rest of Tamriel. As I said in my last post, I do respect your opinion, I'm simply conveying that I don't agree - I strongly don't agree, in fact. I'll save the users the repost and just say that I don't agree for reasons already stated. A Khajiit is a sentient, humaniod feline. . . I think it's important that we keep all three describers in mind as we define the race, and the same goes with the Argonians.

Also, I can't wait to say that I told you so, it's my favorite thing in the world to say, lol. I hope I'm right, in fact I believe I'm right. I do agree, however, that there is no physical evidence of such and we will need to await the results of whatever odd union Bethesda puts in front of us in the next game. I just hope they can avoid Necrophilia for a bit longer.