Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4544033-20151025003707

It has been a slow week. Not a lot to speak of, and I do not even have a corny joke to add to the front of this. So lead me your ears and hear what I have to report in this weeks weekly update.


 * As we agreed to do in last weeks Moot we moved Wikipedia to Project:Wikipedia.


 * We also had a CT meant to discuss changes to the chat policy. However, that CT ended rather fast.  No plans or intended changes where given, and things became heated so the CT was shut down.


 * We have an interesting turn of events in MOTM. We have a new nomination  This is a rare event, having two nominations.  I ask you all to give support to who you think should be this months MOTM, and be respectful of both editors.


 * I shut down all three nominations for good articles. The first two where two small and do not fit our current policy dispite their higher quality.  The third was approved.  Reman Empire is now a good article, and has already been nominated for FA status.


 * After removing these items, a new GA nomination was made. Please review Auroran Crisis and let us know if you approve its application.

Moot summary

 * After the massive Moot last week, that lasted three hours. We are setting a limit on topics a person can bring up in a session.  We ask that editors only bring forth 2-3 items, and keep in mind the size of them when bringing them forward.  The motion passed 10-0


 * We discussed our current policy for featured images. Some felt that our screenshots are only a part of what we have, and we should show Bethesda screenshots as well.  After debating this, we came to a comprimise. We will do a better job at showcasing the offical images on our Facebook, and will show one of the images at least once a week.  9-0


 * We reviewed our ending the use of the Pagename template. This template was used mainly on new articles. The template when used adds the articles title to the page.  We used to use this all the time on new articles, to save the editor some time instead of having to write out the whole name.  We removed its used some time back.  After talking it over, we could not reach a agreement of putting it back into use, so we will not bring it back.2-3-4


 * We now ask that those presenting in the moot write a clearer agenda to their topics when registering as presenters. 9-0

Thats all, I hope we have more to provide next week. Until then, happy editing.-Cheatcodechamp (talk) 00:37, October 25, 2015 (UTC) 