Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-76.97.80.106-20130811163656/@comment-89.245.219.32-20131224203559

92.13.116.74 wrote: Zippertrain85 wrote: 92.13.116.74 wrote: Zippertrain85 wrote: 89.245.219.32 wrote: Pink Slim wrote: an emperor who gives away one country, and gives omnicidal maniacs free reign is not an emperor. An Emperor who does that to protect his citizens and to buy time in order to build a strong enough army to destroy these omnicidal maniacs is IMO a true Emperor. He already had the strong army to beat these maniacs. Yet he choose to stop fighting them and give into their every demand. How is that a good Emperor? He is an emporer... just not a very good one. I never questioned that. Just summarising. How is that a good Emperor? A good Emperor always wants to protect his citizens. If the Thalmor would have took complete control over the Empire by killing Mede and conquering all of Cyrodiil, massive genocide would happen. He knew this and the only solution to this was signing the WGC.