Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20140220220301/@comment-17087283-20140221205916

Speysider wrote: The fact that these re-evaluations have descended into whether someone is active or not means that other users have noticed several users who aren't even here any more. Which means they know that a staff member's activity is just as important as the job they do, even more so tbh. I think it is pretty obvious to evryone who is active or inactive. That isn't what this discussion should be about, what happens to inactive or semi-active staff shouldn't be on the community's mind.