Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26893431-20180203204530/@comment-25356303-20180518055736

Reviving this thread because some folks over at the UESP have had some similar ideas.

I've been thinking about this proposal over the past couple months, and in that time I've started to like "UL" (unlicensed) more than "DEV" (developer). The issues of determining whether certain obscure texts are licensed/unlicensed still remains, but it feels the "neatest" classification to me regardless.