User blog comment:LDmg/Meh/@comment-16047389-20140520135940

I find your argument, while initially interesting, to be disappointinly lacking in substantial evidence. Furthermore, every point of your argument brought up is purely subjective in nature. It's easy to make a case like this when you "feel" like it makes sense. But without an objective argument or proof of your claim, it is nothing more than speculation being passed of as fact.

I have nothing against speculation. It necessary for trying to understand or find the most likely answers to questions that otherwise have none. But most speculation is backed up with a logical argument in order to better support it. It is for these reasons that I completely disagree with your point.

There is simply no evidence to even prove "Meh".