The Elder Scrolls Wiki:Requests for removal of user rights

This is for nominating administrators to get their user rights removed if the majority of the community wishes it.

Voting will last until every single registered user that has voted in the past week before the nomination has voted, or after a period of 3 days. In this case voting will end at 0:00 UTC on the third day.

Requirements:


 * 1) Only those that have edited in the past week before the election (excluding those who were blocked and the accused) are eligible to vote.
 * 2) Participating registered users' votes must have a 2/3 supermajority for adminship to be removed.
 * 3) Participating administrators' votes must have a 2/3 supermajority for adminship to be removed.

Michaeldsuarez
I nominate him for doing no good on this Wiki and for existing solely to revert my templates and nitpick everything I do. The Wiki will be better off without him. If he doesn't get removed them I'm going to resign, because I can't deal with this crap anymore. -- Xell Khaar 16:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

For

 * 1) Xell Khaar 16:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) –K.A.J•T•C•E• 17:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Arandil 17:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Against

 * 1) This isn't fair. You don't have the right to remove me since I hurt your pride. Our disagreements are trivial. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 16:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) What a complete joke. I suggest you focus on fixing this Wiki, rather than dicking around and RFRA'ing someone because "he hurt your pride". If you're going to act like that, then to expect support is ridiculous. I gave up wanting revenge for "hurt pride" back when I was under 15. --Thomas Rattim (talk)
 * 3) Bullshit nomination.  If you're unhappy with how he's  treating you, then that's your problem and certainly not his.  MDS is a respected editor and losing him would be a far worse scenario than losing a troll like Xell. -- supergeeky1 18:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) He has big plans for this wiki. -- the Prince, Xizor
 * 5) HOW DARE YOU RFFR MDS?!? Madclaw
 * 6) M.D.S.F.R.I.E.N.D. -- 4-LOM
 * 7) He's an agent of chaos. - Mr. Joker
 * 8) - Billy Arrowsmith (Talk), 18:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments
I'm afraid this may be the only way forward. I'm sorry Michaeldsuarez but objectivity is the key here, not wisdom. –K.A.J•T•C•E• 17:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I think this is for the best. You yourself said you didn't want to come back to active duty here. Lets look at this as a fresh start. Arandil 17:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Who the hell are all these people that voted? Your friends from another Wiki? It says right there in the description that only active members who have edited in the past week before the election can vote. Your friends who don't use this Wiki don't count. -- Xell Khaar 19:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Xell Khaar
Although I elected him and elevated him to his present rank, I now regret it. Xell is a Loose cannon. He's quick to anger and threats he lacks the ability to work well with others, and he takes trivia issues too personally. All in all, he lacks wisdom. It doesn't take wisdom to copy templates from Wookieepedia; anyone can do that. Also, the only reason is attempting to remove me is due to petty disagreements. Whatever happened to Freedom of speech? Aren't people allow to disagree? Why should people be punished for voicing their opinion? If you give in to Xell's demand, you'll create a wiki where Xell has total and unmarked power. Is that the future you want? If you believe in morals and rationality, you won't allow Xell to do this; we must fight back. KAJ, Xell isn't acting objectively; he's doing it because it's personal to him. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 17:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

For

 * 1) --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 17:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * So, Arandil, Xell's been good for this Wiki but Michael hasn't? Right. From the messages I've seen, I see no reason why he should be an Admin. --Thomas Rattim (talk)
 * 1) -- supergeeky1 18:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I don't know what your deal is. I saw that you blocked RamblinWreck90 for NO reason at all. Just that he was a "Suspected" sock puppet of me. I can tell you now that he IS NOT a scock puppet of me. He is A friend of mine and I helped him get started on wookieepedia. Heck, I dont even know his password. The Bible tells us to forgive and forget. For some reason you can not do that. And about you saying that I need to admit to my sins, I dont know what sins I have done. I have had my parents, friends, and family all look at what you said that was "Sins" and they dont see anything wrong. I have figured you out. You are an Evil man who does not care about onthers. You are unreasonable.I am starting to doubt that you are a Christian. And If I didnt know any better I'd say you were a sock puppet of the Devil. I am glad that you will eventually have to pay for what you have done. Whether its in Hell or when you face God on Judgement day. \

And If you really are a Christian you need to think about something: As brothers in Christ we need to put aside our differences and stand together and make it our goal to set a good example for others so they might see the light of Jesus in us.

I rest my case. Have a good night. --Prince Xizor
 * 1) B.A.D.P.E.R.S.O.N. -- 4-LOM
 * 2) He reminds me of my father... I hated my father. - Mr. Joker
 * 3) - Billy Arrowsmith (Talk), 18:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Xell has worked damm hard on this site, trying to turn around the mess you created. Unmarked power? Freedom of speech? Aren't you taking this a little too seriously. This wiki needs a single, determined, knowledgeble Admin, and thats Xell. Also you call him petty? The only reason your nominating him is becuase he nominated you. Enough! Arandil 17:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments

 * This isn't true. Xell has a habit of acting unreasonably (click on the links I provided above). I have acted honorably and reasonably on all the wikis I've served. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 17:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Really, what type of user gets anger just because I told him the copyright of the wiki? --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 17:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * In the examples you gave Xell was reacting to your constant reverting of his work, hardly unreasonable. Also, if I read the voting requirements correctly, you may not vote against the removal of your own staus. Arandil 17:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I revert any edit that isn't in our best interests. Also, Xell is the one who overrides my edits and my original templates so the wiki could appear more like Wookieepdia. Where's this wiki's individuality? I will not doom this wiki into being a copy of Wookieepedia. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 18:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Were hardly in danger of that. One site deals with Star Wars, the other with Elder Scrolls. I fail to see a problem. Arandil 18:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Just a heads up, if you can't find viable reasons for MDS to lose his Admin rights, and you succeed in RFRA'ing him, I will go to Wikia. Seeing as he's a Central Wiki Admin and we're both trusted users, I'm fairly sure they will reinstate him almost immediately. What I do suggest is that both sides ignore each other if needs be, and one side grow up and get on with improving the Wiki, not causing strife. --Thomas Rattim (talk)
 * How about we stop the act? You and I both know that I can't sway you. Every time I advance my agreement, you just come up with another excuse. Let's move on and stop waiting each others' time. I already knew that you were going to vote against me due to offhanded comments you left on my talk page. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 18:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

That would be ideal, but i'm afraid it may not be possible. I also Wikia may not consent given the sockpuppetry that people are employing to rig the vote. Arandil 18:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, this whole thing is shit! It should end now. It's a complete waist of time. Tom is right: Michael should not WILL NOT loose his rights. Wikia simply won't allow some guy/girl to come in, take over a wiki, and demote a trusted, long-time user. --Wylind (Talk) 18:54 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) A cheerful heart is good medicine, but a crushed spirit dries up the bones. (Proverbs 17:22) -- The Dark Prince
 * This isn't sockpuppetry, Arandil. We're just informing other people of the vote. It's called the IRC. :) Wikia have tools to check for sockpuppets, so we're fine if they want to take a look. --Thomas Rattim (talk)

It doesn't matter either way. The requirements say that a user must have edited the mainspace a week before the vote. None of your votes are going to count. Arandil 19:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Which is pointless. Wikia's staff is going to look at this, see how many people are against Michael losing his admin rights and see how many people want him to stay. This "voting block", if you will, is just holding up the process. They aren't going to remove Michael's admin rights because they'll see the majority of the users want him to stay. Wylind (Talk)
 * Is there any point to this nomination against me? I already said if Michaelsuarez doesn't get removed I'll resign, nominating me is pointless. -- Xell Khaar 19:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)