Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-32767830-20190908182120/@comment-32767830-20190908204756

Atvelonis wrote: If we decide to create those articles only for ESO, we would have to create no more than somewhere around 30 of them
 * We will have to manually create articles for every single duplicated book in the series. This would be extremely time-consuming, as it cannot reasonably be automated by a bot.

Atvelonis wrote: The DPL call could theoretically be fixed if we added a collection parameter to the regular template, and only used it for ESO pages. Online Book articles will be using two templates this way. This inconsistency may confuse new editors, will require changes to newarticle template (we can't rule out the possibility that some book from the previous game can be added requiring a new article to be created) and require more rules for the AWB. And if the Books template does the same thing that the OnlineBooks does, wouldn't the second one be superfluous?