Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4799587-20140909072622/@comment-26474238-20140921023122

I believe in innocent until proven guilty. If a source of information is dubious even in the least, and cannot be replicated through other means, then I would not advocate it as an irrefutable medium for presenting evidence against someone. Proof should always lie in witnesses, and/or catching the rule-breaker red-handed. Screenshots are nice, and for 85% of rule infractions, are a great source of basic evidence. But when it comes to controversial issues where bias is apparent, screenshots should be left outside where they belong, and only brought in as circumstancial evidence to back up more concrete evidence.