User blog comment:Zippertrain85/Why The Imperials Are Wrong/@comment-172.6.60.43-20130709154014/@comment-9062114-20130710025626

Correction, my stubborn Nord friend. Zippertrain, the Forsworn were created after Ulfric attacked them at Igmund's request.They were perfectly peaceful until Ulfric stormed in and pointlessly slaughtered many natives. I've already presented as much proof as I need, yet you ignore the main point. Did you not say that the Thalmor stormed the Imperial City? You really think they did that for show? No way in Oblivion. They sacked it and pointed a sword at Titus Mede. And was it not you who said that Tullius has plans to rebel against the Thalmor? And did the Empire betray Ulfric? No, if anyone did, it was Igmund. And I meant your Stormcloak sympathizer who called us douches. As for telling us that the Legate is saying something and Tullius isn't, you can say it a thousand times, but you're just going against something you already said. So you and your bad grammar can go play "rebel hero" the Legion tries to keep Ulfric the "great hero" from the High Queen's throne. That's wrong. The Forsworn would sacrifice people to their Gods. That's why they were attacked in the first place. Not all the Reachmen became like that. A lot moved into Markarth to live a normal life. Even if they weren't like that, isn't it Igmund's fault. Since Ulfric was just doing a job? He was the one who actually wanted it done. You need to brush up on your lore a bit, the Empire reclaimed the Imperial City. As well as destroying every soldier in the Dominion's armies. Does Tullius say disprove it? Then how do yo know it's wrong? If this is all the proof you have, then you're really just grasping at straws. And the High Queen will never get the throne if people like you on the ones who defend the Empire.