Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-30011802-20170217032502/@comment-26893431-20170326202104

Terawolf119 wrote: 1. LOL, I meant weak, unfit, etc.

2. So why do make it out to be so strong, if you don't know how strong it realy is?

3. Then why would it attack skyrim?

4. Yes, but what I meant is your most loyal family members says your son is alive, but dying, but you say untill I see him, I have no son.

5. Yes but that is unlikely, see now?

6. True, but it is true. 1. Well we have the second-in-command of the Stormcloaks who says that they are the "sons and daughters of farmers, shopkeepers, soldiers, etc.", who also says that "they are getting massacred", seems pretty evident that they are weak.

2. Because a loading screen stating they could have slaughtered the Empire had the White-Gold Concordat not been signed, seems to imply that they are pretty damn strong. It doens't say winning, no, it goes one step further, slaughtering.

3. Because Skyrim would be independent and weak.

4. Then there's still mention of a son. Unlike these spies. There's nothing stating about other spies, here there is a pretty clear source stating there's a son.

5. Why would it be unlikely? And even if it is, you can't say it isn't true until you prove it. I never said it's unlikely, just that's there's no truth until it's proven and trying to say that there are more fingers, you'd need evidence.

6. But irrelevant, so why bring it up?