Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26896471-20151004010902/@comment-26074798-20151009172713

RenzXVI wrote: Sorry for only voicing this out now. I think it's more important for experienced editors to be able to attend the moot than a lot of inexperienced ones. In our current moots, the experienced editors are the ones who have the suggestions and do the presentations, the inexperienced editors usually just vote without us even knowing if they really do understand what was being suggested (because they don't edit a lot). Choosing majority over a minority; Having a moot full of inexperienced editors wouldn't do much good if there aren't any experienced editors to guide them, IMO. I attend a lot of moots and edit a bit but I am still a noob, I rarely have any moot topics, I mostly just vote and attempt to give little suggestions if I have any. The moot just wont run if all we have are inexperienced editors, even if there's a lot of them. :p Yes, we don't need a hundred people who don't have a clue about wikia. If new users attended, sure, or any users that occasionally edit is fine, but we don't need an empire of people coming that have never edited once or haven't edited in a while with no incentive to do so.