The Elder Scrolls Wiki talk:Chat Moderators


 * Users must be nominated into their position by an active chat moderator or chat frequent staff member. Nominations for Chat Moderator should be made here, by using the button below.

Casting a vote
Community votes should be cast using one of the following templates with a reason:

→ Write a reason for support

→ Write a reason for opposition

→ Write a reason for neutrality

→ Write a comment on the topic without voting

Voting generally lasts for 10 days, however, it may be shortened depending on number support/oppose votes.

EmperorJohnson
EJ has been helping around in the chat a lot lately, when things get out of hand he's never to slow to try and put things back in order, he's very helpful and for this I think he deserves to be a mod. Scholy the Wizard (talk) 20:34, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Support
I support EJ. His behaviour improved over the last few months, and espescially the last days proved that he'd do a better job at moderating the chat than some other actual Chat Moderators. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 20:36, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

As nominator Scholy the Wizard (talk) 21:14, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

EJ is helpful to the chat and has acted maturely on many occasions as well as cooling down many arguments. I believe he should be a mod. MoS(Annoy me. Do it.)(Become a Stalker Today!) 20:47, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

I agree with all the other supporters, EJ has definetly improved and could make a good moderator. I'll give him a chance.DivineTedrius (talk) 21:18, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
Look, Ej, I like you. But your habits or foul language, insulting users, disregarding others, and bringing drama into chat work as a sort of fire wall to your progress. Work on these things and try again. Hell, I'll nominate you if you prove you can change ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 02:13, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

I have not actually seen him help in chat. 20:39, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

EJ has shown multiple times to be hot-headed and aggressive towards people who disagree with him, giving him the ability to ban other users could most likely lead to trouble for the chat. Zippertrain85 (talk) 20:45, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

I have met and spoken with EJ on many occasions, I have known him for almost a full year now, I do not belive him being a Chat Moderator is a good idea Nelthro (talk) 20:53, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

EJ is not Moderator material. He has ended issues, what, twice from what I heard. Yesterday being one. Another being a few months ago. The reason I oppose him is because before this month, all he would do is shit on people, whether Main Chat or Private Messages. I've personally been attacked by EJ multiple times on Main Chat. Another User, who I will not mention, has been personally attacked by EJ on Main Chat. On PMs, he harrasses me, even when I told him to stop. He's manipulated many friends of mine while doing nothing good. He's matured abit, I will admit, but he has not done anything worthy of the honorary title of Chat Moderator. He's only improved this month. I genuinely feel once he gets the small power of Chat Moderator, he'll stretch it a long ways and become a Corrupted Moderator. The first, if memory serves me right. — Profile/Talk 21:13, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

He seems to have a habit of swearing. Like, a lot. (Admittedly it can be funny, but it's certainly not necessary) He also is somewhat offensive towards people when he is speaking. No hard feelings, man. Hypomaniac (talk) 21:20, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't think EJ is suitable for the position of chat moderator, while he has shown improvement, multiple times there have been problems involving said user. Anyone is capable of moderating a chat, it's a different situationy when it comes to having the correct mindset and having the ability to stay calm in demanding situations. ゆ (talk) 21:26, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

There isn't a sane person who would support EJ. He's incredibely vulgar and manipulative. He also tends to deliberately coerce others into losing faith in their friends. I don't care what anyone says, EJ is a living catastrophe. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (Awaken the somneling demon )

I agree that EJ might have shown some growth and improvement regarding "being helpful", but is that what Chat Mods are all about? How about we Mod everyone who acts decently in chat? Lemme cut it out for you: it won't work. I'll start by calling out on his edits. 14 edits on main. True, edits are not a requirement anymore, but 14? Also, EJ might be "helpful", but what about his character? Much like Stendarr pointed out, EJ fails miserably in this aspect. I've received a number of complaints from various users I will not name, for respect for them. Notg only disagreements, no, but direct offension against them, for the sole purpose of hurting. And those very recently, too, which shows me EJ may have improved as an user, but not as a person. And what does it matter? Chat Mods need to be not only helpful, but nice, knowledgeable and trustworthy. Also, would I trust EJ? My answer is no. I've also had a few complaints because of him either telling things I told him in private, explicitly stating that it was to be kept a secret, or by saying I've done things I actually never have. If it was up to me, EJ would never be a Chat Mod. Now, one might argue my opinions are biased, to which I cannot deny, but I can assure nothing I said here is a lie, and people here know I'm not one for lying. PLPellegrini (talk) 23:32, June t10, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry EJ, I like you and all, but you are not moderator material at all. Some of the things you say and do are very questionable and I think it would be for the best that you remain a normal user. --Speysider Talk Page 11:57, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

All of the reasons stated above. HolyWyvern (talk) 16:07, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral
I thought about my vote again, and I think EJ isn't fully ready to become a Chat Mod yet. I'd give him 1-2 more months before supporting him. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk)

People here have very good points, I was a bit too hasty with this nomination. Scholy the Wizard (talk) 01:12, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
@ Pickle: Really? You were probably not Online yesterday evening when the whole Zipper accident happened. EJ exactly like a Moderator would behave (which Zip didn't, btw) and tried to solve the situation. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 20:41, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

@AES: Even if that did happen, we should not give people moderator status for a one-time incident. The reason we have so many mods who don't do their jobs is because we gave the job too willy-nillily. If, however, he does more things to warrant him becoming a chat mod, I will consider changing my vote. 20:46, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Trying to start an argument AES? Not very mod like... Zippertrain85 (talk) 20:55, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

@Pickle, thing is that what happened yesterday wasn't a one-time incident. As I said in my support-post, EJ has been improving over the last few months. He also often tries to enforce the rules if moderators don't. @Zip, I wasn't trying to start an argument. I simply mentioned what happened yesterday. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 20:59, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

I don't deserve to be a chat moderator at the moment, as a slow improvement is not the same as what moderators have got. However some of the opposements are downright hypocritical, But I shall not get into this for 'fear' of being called biased. EmperorJohnson (talk) 21:33, June 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * Don't we have enough Mods, already? \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ ( Awaken the somneling demon )

Honestly, I don't believe EJ should be a mod at the moment, but do you guys really have to be so insulting and rude? Calling him a living catastrophe is too far, and instead of insulting him, you should try to help him improve. If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all. Likes-That-Tail (talk) 19:47, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Stendarr God of Justice and Mercy
At first, Stendarr seems like a playful user who can get into fights with time, as we all do. But with time to improve, and multiple conversations about the subject, I believe he is ready. I do not nominate who I do not believe can do the job. I check and look into it, and with Labcoatbilly, I believe I am good at choosing moderators. Stendarr is kind to all of our users, started last week to keep any and all arguments in private messaging, knows many users on a personal level, has worked for and developed a the ability to stay calm and not put wood on the fire so to speak when insulted or in an argument, is a frequent user on chat, one of the most known users, and has the mindset needed to moderate a chat. I know we are not in need of more chat mods at the time being, and should be cutting back, but I believe this is an opertunity we should not pass up.ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 18:53, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Support
As nominatorShawnHowellsCP (talk) 18:53, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

I agree with what has been stated above. Stendarr has acted like a mod should, and has lately been keeping the arguments in the PMs. I also think he has the attitude and patience for a chat mod. The demented Breton (talk) 18:57, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Is very kind, and insists arguments be kept in PMs. Which is pretty great, this way it doesn't flood chat. Hypomaniac (talk) 20:05, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

I was surprised when I saw he wasn't already a moderator. He would make a good one, and I don't see why he wouldn't. DivineTedrius (talk) 22:06, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

I have known Ketick for some time, and even though he may seem immature at times, he also shows maturity when the need arises. In my opinion, this is chat moderator material. Nelthro (talk) 23:34, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
Stendarr has improved slightly over the months since he was last moderator, He was (although some time ago) Blocked for 'spamming porn links'. "developed a the ability to stay calm" This was disproven yesterday as he became angry when I myself was nominated. All the time I've known Stendarr he has been prone to insult people randomly and not be able to control his anger, If he could actually improve himself instead of (after being warned that if he continued he would be banned multiple times) say "I've changed this time, I promise." He has made multiple sexual references to different users and has treated rape like a funny subject, This is not chat moderator material.

Major improvement would be needed for me to even consider supporting stendarr for a chat moderator position, "Stendarr is kind to all of our users" This isn't even half true, as previously said, He is prone to insult people because of short bursts of anger. It would take ages for Stendarr to be logically consider to gain a chat moderator position. EmperorJohnson (talk) 19:11, June 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * I am only unkind to you. I am unkind to you when you instistagte being unkind. Notice how whenever you are nice to me, I am nice to you, but the second you are unkind to me, I am unkind back? There's something called Karma. — Profile/Talk 19:28, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but he is still too immature to be a mod. I've also never really seen him enforce the rules. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 19:07, June 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * You want to see me be mature even though I showed it multiple times, I will show it. I don't enforce the rules because no one listens to me because I don't have a star next to my name, anymore. — Profile/Talk 19:28, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Tends to demonstrate immaturity and will often refuse to acknowledge someone's very existence when they disagree with him and / or speak the truth rather than what he wants to hear. Short-fused, as well. Current number of Chat Moderators and respective perfomances satisfactory. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ ( Awaken the somneling demon )


 * this is untrue, he seems to frequently listen, even when I say he is wrong, or should refrain from a certain act Nelthro (talk) 23:31, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Ket but I've never really seen you do any moderator related material yet. Scholy the Wizard (talk) 01:28, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

His last tenure as chat moderator didn't go well, and I've yet to see him do moderator related tasks. At most times he's in the chat, I find it uncommon for him to actually speak at times, and he's recent feud with Emperor Johnson has clearly not helped. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 01:49, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but considering that your last time as a chat mod went pretty badly and upset the chat, as well as the fact that you don't actually do much to moderate the chat, there would be no reason to promote you. --Speysider Talk Page 15:32, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral
I don't know honestly, Stendarr is not a bad user, but I haven't seen him really calm down a situation ever, and sometimes does even fall to his emotions. I would give this more time, to be honest. Zippertrain85 (talk) 20:49, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

Likes-That-Tail
I would like to nominate LTT as he has helped us mods from time to time. He is friendly and mature and I believe he is suited for this job. From personal experience, he has calmed down situations and notified us mods when a user is acting disruptive.

Support
As nominator. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 02:47, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

LTT is overall a nice person, and doesn't act hostile to anyone else to my knowing. MisterSir (talk) 02:50, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Quite honestly, I have never been more in support of something on her. I'm surprised it has taken this long for LTT to be nominated. He's always on, he's always helpful, and he's always friendly to everyone. As someone who frequents chat daily, I have never seen him in a feud with another user, nor have I seen him try to start one. He is one of the greatest people that I have had the pleasure of getting to know, and making him a moderator would do nothing but improve our chat community. Lol Hi I'm Sienna 02:55, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

LTT is a good guy, I've seen him act friendly on the chat is there at times when mods are lacking even. I think he'll do well. Zippertrain85 (talk) 02:58, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

I think LTT deserves mod. He is a friendly person, and helps other out when the time is needed. He acts mature, but can still have fun, which I believe is moderator material. The demented Breton (talk) 02:59, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

LTT is a great guy, and he's real chill. I've seen him resolve stuff a bit, and I thought he was a good calmer-downer. Don't care if it isn't a word, it's what he is! Hypomaniac (talk) 03:02, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

I seriously, and full heartedly belive LTT has what it takes to be a moderator. The knowledge, the time, and the act. I seriously hope he wins. Even though we have enough moderators, we would be stupid to pass him up. ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 04:00, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

I can currently not think of anyone else better suited for the position of Chat Moderator. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 15:25, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Good moderator material. --Speysider Talk Page 15:35, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Has shown to be mature, calm, and knows the chat well. Is suitable for chat mod. ゆ (talk) 16:37, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Known around chat to be supportive, welcoming and useful towards both veteran and new users. However, as Spey stated, this should be the last nomination for a while. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ ( Awaken the somneling demon )

Why? Because I like that tail that's why. Scholy the Wizard (talk) 23:57, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Known, active, and I honestly believe he'd be a good Mod. PLPellegrini (talk) 02:06, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

All of the reasons started above. HolyWyvern (talk) 16:06, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

LTT is a great person who deserves to be a mod, he never seems to be unkind to anyone in chat and deserves to be recognized for his generally friendly, exemplary behaviour. XN3RDXD3RPX (talk) 17:15, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

LTT is a great user. He truly is a helpful person and he helps me, personally, through a lot of crap. He's also a very kind gentleman. I also agree with Scholy the Wizard. — Profile/Talk 05:09, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

LTT's a'ight. He knows how to keep a level head and solve problems diplomatically rather than creating unnecessarily long arguments, and knows the difference between humorous joking and outright mockery very well. Lab Coat Billy (talk) 06:44, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
I have only ever seen Tail act like a moderator when moderators are online, and mostly he's saying what a moderator has already said and fixed. Prime examples of this is when he chimes in (after around five people tell someone their trolling) "Trollings against the rules." I know theres being helpful, but seriously? When something has been said multiple times, mostly by moderators then you do not have to repeat it. Although tail has a lot of good qualities, I've noticed when moderators are not online he manages to find himself into arguments and then after they have stopped by themselves he'll claim that he stopped them.

Tail could be moderator material if he didn't only try when moderators were online and currently active, that is not when we need moderators. We need moderators to stop something when no other moderator is on, not just simply repeat another one. Tail himself is a nice person, however being nice isn't what you need to be a moderator. Sometimes you need to stop being kind to actually get your job done, unfortunatly I don't see tail doing this. Edit; http://puu.sh/9uLZA/07440e1a62.png  EmperorJohnson (talk) 16:47, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral
Changed my vote, now that there's evidence of LTT not having the best Moderator qualities. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 17:13, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
If LTT is promoted, I think it should be the last nomination for a while. There are too many moderators at this point, we don't need any more of them. --Speysider Talk Page 15:35, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Spey. There's too many mods coming in, the side of the chat looks like space with all the bright yellow stars. Too many chefs spoil the broth. MisterSir (talk) 16:07, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Hey EJ. Thanks for the tips, I'll try to improve when mods aren't around. However, I do already help around when mods aren't online, and saying I do nothing is completely false. As for saying that I only chime in after other mods have confronted/warned a player, that would be a send delay. By the time my computer receives what the other mods have said, I've already pressed send. It's not a purposeful thing, it's just how real time chats work. Also, when you say that I participate in arguments and then try to stop them, that is again, completely wrong. I never go around and talk about how I stopped arguments the night before, because what would be the point in that? Do people run around telling everyone how they told someone to stop talking? As for participating in 'arguments', there's a difference between having a civil debate where everybody is calm and having a good time versus arguing by insulting users and starting flame wars. An example of an okay debate: What is the best type of ice cream. An example of a NOT okay debate: The arguments between you and BrandonSolo10 that got you two on probation. I respect that you'll go against seventeen people, but EJ, I have plenty of flaws, you don't have to make them up. Likes-That-Tail (talk) 16:48, June 15, 2014 (UTC)


 * Why do you have to bring up my probation to try and make a valid point? As soon as I join in with a civil debate it becomes an argument, why? Because its me joining in, even though they might not be any insults.  http://puu.sh/9uN3D/3c79be3645.png, Why do you have to PM me stuff like this? It makes no logical sense, nor is it something a moderator would actually think about doing. Its stupid and immature these aren't qualities needed for a moderator. Most of the supports here have faulty logic "I like him so he should be a mod." (popularity contest) "He doesn't argue." (well done for being a person that doesn't have a temper.)  You really shouldn't try to bring up stuff that is already being sorted by moderators to try and make my oppose look futile, it isn't. EmperorJohnson (talk) 17:02, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

LTT, I have never agreed that EJ is "butthurt". You never even asked me about that. I don't think you even ever PMd me, to be frank. I'll change my vote to a Neutral vote, which I might change later, since you lied. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 17:11, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Rights Removal: Jett Cyber
I am making this topic to discuss the removal of chat moderator rights for user "Jett Cyber". Despite previous claims, this user does not go into chat and the last usage of the user's abilities was an abuse of the position (kicking someone by request). The contributions by the user indicate very sporadic activity on the site and most of which are posts in off-topic / roleplaying threads. Please use the voting templates as normal in the appropriate headers.

Support
- As requestor. --Speysider Talk Page 17:49, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

He has been on chat under 5 times. Not since I became mod. Since I joined the wiki. About 5 months I believe. Maybe 6 or 7.

ADDED NOTE: Not only have I completely sided with this vote, but in light of Scholar's picture, I think Jett should have never gotten power. He is, for lack of a better or more civilized term, sludge. Solitude Guard (talk) 16:59, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Was extremely corrupt during the time in which he was actually active, and has been inactive for 6 months now. During my time here, I've probably seen him come online only 3 times. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 18:12, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Wow. I seriously cannot believe why he isn't de modded yet, he is very inactive. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 18:55, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

I forgot he even existed. He was inactive for several months and almost never moderated appropriately. I'm only surprised his rights haven't already been removed. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ ( Awaken the somneling demon )

Doesn't act like a Chat Mod when he is on the chat, and only really used his rights when he abused his power. Needs to go. Zippertrain85 (talk) 21:12, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

No offense Jett, but there's no point in having a mod who doesn't even get on the chat. There are plenty of active users who fit the qualifications, so why give the star to somebody who is inactive and barely meets the requirements? Likes-That-Tail (talk) 03:29, June 14, 2014 (UTC)

I've seen this guy quite a lot....In the chat moderator semi-active section, as for the chat itself, not at all. Sera Scholy of House Telvanni (talk) 03:56, June 14, 2014 (UTC)

Jett should of never got the position of chat moderator, mainly because of bigotry. Him being inactive and some of his rude insults to people should of got him demoted in the reevaluation. EmperorJohnson (talk) 16:25, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

I have barely seen him on chat, and even then he never did anything. 17:10, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
Professional debater eh? Well why don't you debate your way out of this? What's up with you going around like a Jehovah Witness preaching how athiests will "go to hell" like in this: http://postimg.org/image/h288f27gv/? Sera Scholy of House Telvanni (talk) 13:12, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Rights Removal: Pink Slim
I am making this topic to discuss the removal of chat moderator rights for user "Pink Slim". This user does not use the chat and has not actively used their abilities in any discernible way. The user's contributions indicate the user may be more suited to being a forum moderator as the user is very active in the forums. Please use the voting templates as normal in the appropriate headers.

Support
- As requestor. --Speysider Talk Page 17:49, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

I thought the same thing, actually. DivineTedrius (talk) 17:51, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Him returning after about 6 months inactivity doesn't excuse his inactivity. He also doesn't exactly moderate the chat wither when he's online. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 18:01, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * usually when I am in the chat there are either more moderators, which allows me to work on things I believe are more important to my time than moderating a chat that is already being well moderated at the time, or the users are often polite. I watch the chat at all times and since I have returned I have warned multiple people to change the topic or to watch their tone, I have not had to ban anyone, and I have kicked less than a handfull of users, not because I don't pay moderate the chat, but because I know how and when to warn people that their actions will have reprucussions. 19:58, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

I've heard reports that he will unban a certain user even though said user's ban was justified. This is not the kind of behaviour for mods. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC Say Hi! stalk edits 18:53, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Those reports are wrong, what did happen was a user who had contact with me, from an outside source, was banned, I asked why he was banned and he gave me the reason, then another user told us that some other chat moderators (he did not say which) were going to extend his ban to what I felt would be extreme without good reason. I talked to other chat moderators to hear why he was banned and after coming to conclusion I agreed that his ban was justified, but the extension would be too much at this time. I warned him that I would not protect him from his own actions and if he was banned once again to send me screenshots of the chat. 19:58, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

With everything above. 17:12, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral
The user seems to be making a return, but I may change to support at a later time in the vote ShawnHowellsCP (talk) 17:52, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Said user is active once again, but already stated his current hardware does not support chat room. Unless said user can improve his hardware or moderate whenever possible, vote demands neutrality. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ ( Awaken the somneling demon )

I haven't seen Pink on the chat alot, but he is a good user who behaves, and has been making a more stedy return, might be worth keeping. Zippertrain85 (talk) 21:14, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Eh part of me says "Let him stay and we'll see how he does this time" but the other part of me says "With the amount of time he's been away it doesn't seem as if he takes the chat very seriously and what's to stop him from just ditching it again" Sera Scholy of House Telvanni (talk) 03:54, June 14, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
Pink should get another chance. I know he missed an awful lot of time, and that that is inexcusable. But seriously, there were sixth months of inactivity, and nobody did anything about him, now as soon as he returns, now you're going to take his powers? Give it a few days. If he's useful, keep him, if not, take his rights. Likes-That-Tail (talk) 03:45, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't see him very often in the chat at all, also I brought it up now because it needed to be done: the fact it happens just when he returns is purely coincidental. As he stated above and below, he does not find the chat important and does things that he deems more important, nor can he access it from anything other than a mobile phone. This is not what chat moderators should be doing: if you don't care for the chat, resign from the position and don't make up excuses to hold onto the flag for as long as possible, in the vain attempt nobody will notice. --Speysider Talk Page 16:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
I would not mind if I lose my Chat Moderator status, it is not the most important thing in my life, I hop on the chat and watch it when I can, but my work hours are on an unreliable schedual and I have important things to take care of with my family. I am not going to beg you for my moderator status because I do not need it, as I said in my " if I don't become a chat moderator I have no problem helping people in chat that ask for help " I am here to help anyone who needs my help, even if they need my help against other chat moderators who would ban them for no justifiable reason(which was not the case in said assistance)

As to the reason I left for six months, the chat doesn't play well with my laptop, at times it will not scroll down as people post comments, this leads to me having missed all conversation happening between times I scroll down to catch up, as I said I have important things to do, and I cannot keep an eye on the chat at every moment to insure I haven't missed a single post. this severely cuts my effectiveness as a moderator. Recently I discovered my phone does not have the problem my laptop does, since then I have been on the chat as often as possible. I do apologize for having left without warning, and if the reason I lose my status is because of that I don't mind, but to say that I'm not moderating the chat now that I'm back is wrong. 19:58, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

If you have other important things to do then simply resign. This is a job not a title of honour. If you can't do the job then there is no point in being a mod. Sera Scholy of House Telvanni (talk) 03:55, June 14, 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with my colleague. If you are busy, better resign than keep on clinging to a title that you do not deserve. ℳ.Ѻẘεᾔ.ℒℱC  Say Hi! stalk edits 12:54, June 15, 2014 (UTC)


 * Despite the fact that Pink Slim has just suddenly become active again, I believe this same behaviour was exhibited previously when a re-evaluation was done. He became active, battled to keep his rights, stayed around for a few days, then went back to being idle. Who's to say he won't just do this all over again, and repeat it indefinitely to continue keeping rights he doesn't even use? I would like to remind people of a particular policy for chat moderators, quoted below:
 * "Chat moderators who have not monitored the chat regularly over the course of 30 days are considered inactive. Inactive chat moderators will lose their chat moderator rights and will no longer be displayed on our staff list unless they can prove the have made a steady return."
 * Pink Slim has not made a steady return and hasn't monitored the chat regularly at all. By default, he should have already had his flag status removed. --Speysider Talk Page 16:55, June 15, 2014 (UTC)