User blog comment:Zippertrain85/Why the Stormcloaks are right./@comment-9062114-20130505223458/@comment-67.140.38.206-20130505233436

Because Ulfric is supposedly fighting for Nord traditions and doing such a thing would make him look rather bad. If you think him not killing them is good why are you defending him killing Toryyg in such an unfair way?

Sure, the Forsworn are bad, but are you grouping the rest of the Reachmen with them? I hope not, because that is incredibly bigoted and you should feel bad for doing such a thing. And I was referring to those working the smelter, given the fact of spatial compression I have concluded that it is to show the downright terrible treatment the Reachmen are suffering due to prejudice.

What I was trying to say if we are to believe people like Alvor and others, the Empire and the Dominion were rather slow to prosecute Talos worship especially behind closed doors and that Ulfric's  demand was both selfish and convenient because when the Uprising was taken care of the Dominion conveniently swoops down right now of all times to tell the Empire or local Jarl to arrest him. And if the dossier is to believe then Ulfric did work for Dominion unwittingly or not, another thing you are ignoring that I find questionable is why is Ulfric considered a "dormant asset"? It would stand to reason that he would normally be labeled as an active asset or just asset. The point I'm trying to make that apparently blew over your head as you made a Strawman argument is that the events going on are suspicious and should be looked at further, and the conclusion I have made is that the Dominion is behind everything, from the Redguard's victory to the Markarth uprising to (an extent) the duel between Ulfric and Toryyg. Might as well call me crazy as I am one who finds the circumstances around  9/11 suspicious.