User blog comment:Zippertrain85/All Namespaces are important! (A response Blog)/@comment-3186827-20140805154022/@comment-1251315-20140805161259


 * A longer, more detailed style guide was in response to the lack of consistency displayed by our editors during the Skyrim release. You was not here, but pages varied wildly and vague policies did us no favors. Detailed policies and style guides was the response and it worked - pages improved. In addition, we have all seen how well the short, vague chat policy turned out.

I might not have been here, but several edits I have made were reverted based on these very long policies which I disagree with. The requirement to have infoboxes in every article is not stated on any single policy page and nor do I have time to spend reading walls of text that are contradictory and, in some cases, wrong or inaccurate.
 * As for your concerns being ignored - on what talk page did this take place?

I made a thread here to discuss long articles for which it led nowhere due to no posts. I have discussed my displeasure regarding some of the wiki's policies with other sysops via private communication medium's, but there's no overall outcome from such things.

Claiming that I'm being "sensationalist" is just a nice way of telling me to "stop complaining about put up with the policies as I don't care about your suggestions". I don't even know why you've brought up chat policies, as that isn't even relevant to this message, my complaints are about mainspace policies, the manual of style and so on.