User blog comment:G0LD3NF1RE/Dawnguard encounters issues with Playstation/@comment-67.165.61.166-20120901141820/@comment-94.7.116.242-20120902020142

"None of this is correct. Saying something 'doesn't gel well' is not a technical explanation."

What would be the point of explaining everything in full technical jargon? For one thing, the problem might not be down to just one detail...hell, they probably don't even know what the problem IS yet. Giving a full technical explanation would be a waste of time and effort, especially considering less than 1% of the community would understand it...and even then, what does it prove? And why should they prove anything anyway? If they're planning on releasing the game, why don't they just...keep working and release it?

"They had the ability to make the game, it is unreasonable and illogical to assume that to make an additional, smaller, les complicated story on an already known system with known variables would even be difficult."

So you demand a technical explanation, then demonstrate that you actually don't know the first thing about the subject? DLCs are not as simple as you think. True, some are just mini-games, but for something like Skyrim, it's MUCH more complicated, since the DLC has to be intergrated into an already established game. Mounted combat, the crossbows, the new powers...EVERYTHING in the main game needs to be edited and tweaked in order to allow these things to work seamlessly without causing glitches in either the main game or the DLC. I know you want it to be terribly simple so you can keep playing conspiracy theories, but the truth is, it really isn't.