Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-658634-20131216220021/@comment-16047389-20131219143056

BlackSmith wrote: DarthOrc wrote: We know that if those with your preference were in the majority, we wouldn't be having this debate as the Wiki's we cited, as well as many others, would have been split up long ago. You ...know? Is that a fact or a assumption again? If those with my preference would be the majority they would keep on doing the same thing, look for more focused and better organized wiki. The wiki is great if you are playing six games at the same time but most of players are not and if they are looking information, they are interested about the information about that game they are playing right then. Best I have seen are two different games at the same time. I love how you basically tear into DarthOrc for stating his opinion with the logic that it's "a assumption", and then immediately turn around and talk about how great this wiki would be if more people had your opinion on organization. You can't go around and bash people for giving their opinions, especially not when your whole reasoning behind this thread is based solely on your own experiences. If you want to pretend like everything you've stated has more credibility than any of the other posters, then at least make your arguments not so blatantly subjective. So in short, let me clarify your statement: You ASSUME that those with your preference would do a bettter job. You ASSUME that six wikis would be better than one. And you ASSUME that somehow, you'll be able to change minds on this topic, or you wouldn't still be defending it. Here's a fact for you though. None, I repeat NONE, of the posters involved in this article support your idea. This one wiki used to be multiple, was merged into one, and has only increased in success.