Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25136035-20150520144700/@comment-25136035-20150521134646

The Rim of the Sky wrote: I think we should just leave it how it is. It doesn't matter if Kirkbride wrote them or not; all that matters is if it appears in game. If it does, it is cited as a regular source. If it doesn't, it is cited as an OOG (out-of-game) source. Some examples of things that constitute OOG references are The Imperial Library, Kirkbride's Reddit posts, elderscrollsonline.com lore info, Pocket Guides (1st, 3rd, Emperor's Improved), etc. This heavily implies you didnt read my opening post, or looked at the sites, or anything at all. Like previously mentioned, the article with Kirkbride and other developers included differ way too much from those without them. Honestly you simply cant integrate those adequately while keeping both sides happy. It is just not possible, just look at the Aka or Talos articles, they are completely different ones. And just mentioning it at the end of an article or using some minor things isnt something useful at all, since it doesnt satifsy either side, since neither one can have the article the way they would like to.

I really dont see the downsides here at all, and I dont understand why there is so much resistence against it. Most of the sites would stay the way they are for now, and after an OoG text ist included, written by those who would like to do so, they would still be viewable, so you have either side pleased. Mind explaining what you think is bad about that?