Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4984687-20150326211251/@comment-4984687-20150402201507

Madman97 wrote: If I had to choose between Sajuuks two options (Both of which I don't particularly agree with), I would go with the second. I do think that our Admin's are responsible enough to know who would be suited to the task they are going for. However, I don't think it should be without the community's say. I really don't see why voting is bad. Talk of popularity contests and lack of real discussion is pointless to me. I mentioned before that people are hardpressed to change their opinion of someone even if discussed at length. Voting or discussion, the consensus of a person would most likely be the same result. And it is often said to voters that they supply good reasoning for their vote, and while some may have been less than detailed about their reasoning, there is often SOME reasoning behind their decision. Admins have a veto power to deny applications, but it is rarely used when a user recieves a large amount of support votes. If it is used in said case, it often causes controversy and backlash. It has only happened on a few occasions for the old self-nominations.