User blog comment:Draevan13/Skyrim Civil War edit discussion/@comment-11345660-20161102205054/@comment-11345660-20161102221401

If I may have the floor. I have but a moment to get my point across. As a site that aims to be encyclopedic, it is imperative that information that can be interpreted through one's own point of view be conceded to both points of observation: Example being the gold chests accepted. Since it is up to interpretation whether or not it was a bribe, the wording can be reimagined into something softer, like "incentive" or the whole sentence reworked all together, "Jarl Balgruuf accepted the gold chests, which may have possibly been a bribe." (Something more professional than that, obviously, but I'm in a rush and you get my meaning.

As for Trivia, this was a problem some time ago. To me, triva should only exist in the non-diagetic sense, meaning, things that pertain to the game's production or all things having to do with things outside the story the game inhabits. If you're going to include something from a dossier, I'd say that's best suited as a footnote in the main page itself. Also, the whole Mede Empire, third empire argument, I would settle for Tamrielic or Cyrodilic Empire (more specific I think), and when applying different rulers, "Dynasty" is a perfectly acceptable word to describe the different times of the Empire. Septim Dynasty, Mede Dynasty, Cyrodiclic Empire. There. Problem solved. I hope this helped. Sorry for not being a bit more detailed.

Gotta Run!