Board Thread:Administrators' Noticeboard/@comment-1251315-20150907065743/@comment-1738746-20150912005538

I'm kinda standing with Sajuuk again on all this. I've been able to attend the most recent moots because I don't work on weekends anymore (for the time being) but otherwise I can't be there either, and I wasn't there for the moot in which this idea was passed.

Because of the issue that only a small group of the community can actually attend the moot, I think we need to find a balance of what is and isn't acceptable to be passed in the moot.

For example, quote or image of the week- by all means, vote for that in the moot, it's not something that's really going to affect the wiki in a big way.

A different example though- deem that the new trivia policy is not working as it should on the wiki and so decide to completely overthrow something that a large portion of the community discussed and voted on (I know it didn't get thrown out the window in the end but that was mostly because I stood up and pointed out how a small moot group suddenly had the power to overthrow the decision made by the larger community, and I took it upon myself to fix the policy rather than just throw it out).

I thought originally the moot was a thing to be used to help close CTs that have floating around and open for ages without a final decision, rather than coming up with the ideas and doing all the voting there and then and too bad for anyone who can't make the meeting?