User blog comment:Zippertrain85/Dawnguard Conclusion/@comment-17114085-20140524013940/@comment-9062114-20140524043406

Thank you for bringing this to the top and quoting what I said, that will save me A LOT of scrolling XD


 * Facepalm* Okay, once again, why didn't they colonize the land if they were going to different parts of it? It doesn't make any sense what so ever Harold.

It's all impliaction, Skyrim has never said to have opposing kingdoms, even when they reference it in the past they refer to it as SKYRIM not Eastmarch or anything. Showing that he had the whole land that it currently is today, why are being so difficult about this???

You just repeated the EXACT same point here, yes Harold they actually did worship Dragons, that is why they ruled them, therefor there is no reason they would have seperate kingdoms if they were all ruled by the same thing. It's completely contradictory, that's one of the reasons why this theory cannot work at all.

The Volkihar Clan would still be old if they were around the In Interregnum, I also think Harkon was raped too, but doesn't like to admit it due to pride issues. As he is also a pure blooded Vampire, so I don't see why.