Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20140728012626/@comment-9062114-20140728014140

ゆ wrote: Zippertrain85 wrote: ゆ wrote: NationStates itself is rarely talked about in chat at this point, it's kept in PMs and in off-site chats, the issue coming from the fact that the PMs and off-site chats are released to the public, people find out about things that other peole have said, and at that point the community is split in two and drama comes up from that. Drama itself is already banned from chat, an additional situational rule that only applies to one site is unnecessary, a rule against talking about off-site drama would work better, but once again, a general drama rule already exists. Cleary it's not like that UAM, since multiple users have been banned for this. In addition, drama from it is STILL going to the chat. If users have been banned for it already, doesn't that back-up the fact that something like this is unnecessary? And if I'm not mistaken, the users who were banned were banned for threats that were made in PMs and in off-site chats, I'd like to see an example of the continued drama in the main chat that wasn't later warned for by a moderator acting under the "No drama" rule.

I edited my comment to address why is isn't covered. Anyway, Bran was banned on this Wiki for starting drama, the NS talk just is disruptive regardless if it is or is not obvious drama.