Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150326212135/@comment-1251315-20150330155342

Ser Pouce-a-lot wrote: I removed a contribution from an Anon about how a reanimated Lund says "At last" when killed from the trivia in the Lund's Hut article. I debated on leaving it, but it seemed too obvious that it did not belong. My reasoning is that many reanimated NPCs say "At last" when killed, and even if that was unique dialogue exclusive to Lund it should have gone in the article about Lund, not the one about his house. Is that a valid reason for removal? Yes, that's junk trivia, because it "states the obvious": I have no problem with that being removed.

In regards to your other points, there really isn't any way a policy could be made about it. Similar in way to the archiving policy discussion, we could just have a simple "don't include trivia points that "state the obvious" or include obvious untrue statements", as that covers various points like "X does not appear in any other games" or "X is the only person to have Y", as well as "Vivec likes cheese according to random user X". Simple, clear and not likely to cause any issues imo.