Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-4659579-20130915082315/@comment-3524435-20131215180107

80.216.217.27 wrote: Sevec wrote: The real reason? Bethesda would have to make three versions of most armor/clothing. Take the nightingale armor, for example. If Argonian women didn't have breasts, the devs would need to make one model for male characters, one for female characters, and one for female characters with flat chests. This is more important with some outfits, like the tavern clothes (where the breasts themselves are visible) than daedric armor (where they aren't seen.)

And remember that in Morrowind, they didn't have breasts. However, if you equipped a curiass or shirt that looked like there were breasts underneath, it would look the same on Argoinians as it would on anyone else. If this is it...

What exactly would prevent male Argonian armor from working on female Argonians?

There'd be no difference between female an male Argonians, so what exactly would the problem be?

Why would there be a need for a third armor? Breasts aren't the only difference between male and female bodies, in real life or in Skyrim. There are differences in body proportions that make women look more feminine. The male body in Skyrim is very masculine; there isn't any ambiguity in its gender. If you used the male body for female argonians, they wouldn't look like women, they'd look like men.

Look on the bright side people, you should be able to have argonians with small/no breasts in The Elder Scrolls Online!