Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131113224543/@comment-24358064-20140101213637

Ralok wrote:

Octo8 wrote: Look, if you don't want to read MK's texts, then don't. But then don't expect to be taken serious at discussions. You just want to eat your cake and have it, too. Too stupid to read and understand the required material (which also explains the stupid nature of your posts as assemblies of simpleton one-liners, and your inabilte further up in the discussion to properly read my posts), and yet still wanting to take part in discussions, and hence you rage about the canonicity of MK's material. Even though the devs themselves clearly still use that material. If the devs use that material, how the hell is it not canon? You can argue legalese all you want, but this only matters to courts and not here! Get it in your own damn thick skull that these are two separate issues! I do read, I just wont ever consider them canon because you know... im not an idiot.

and o they arent two separate issues, only bethesda has the right to make elder scrolls. and Kirkbride is not the holy messiah of bethesda studios. You do quite behave like an idiot here, though.

Only Bethesda has the copyright etc. They do not have the right to determine what the fans and the community accept as canon. You just don't seem to get that distinction. Are you so much of a corporate loyalist? That would make you something worse than an idiot: A useful idiot.