Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4544033-20150712015608/@comment-25356303-20150712121947

@Bluesonic: We didn't overturn the CT; we really are just stressing that speculative trivia is getting us some backlash, so it absolutely needs to be both referenced and believable.

We have to avoid coming to far-fetched conclusions with this type of thing. For example, having two identical texts in the same language—Bible of the Deep Ones and N'Gasta! Kvata! Kvakis!—is certainly noteworthy, and one can surmise that there is some sort of connection between the two. However, that is the furthest conclusion that should be drawn; there is nothing else to support the idea that the Sload are the Deep Ones, which was the contentious statement I have since reworded (the latter article actually still contains some ideas that need referencing). Basically, simple speculation is allowed, but complex and/or wild theories are not.

@Wulfharth: It was on a thread I started a little while ago, here is the link to the actual discussion. Some criticism was dealt regarding the wiki's quality control, including the Sload-Deep Ones theory, which made me think twice about that CT.