User blog comment:MonkeydashUnderscore/Imperials Or Stormcloaks?/@comment-166.82.245.89-20120509022154/@comment-166.82.245.89-20120510173040

What I'm saying is that refusing to take the title of High King could be a ploy to make him look more humble than he really is.

As for the treatment, I simply view the mistreatment as thousands of years of cultural bias and due to a lot of fighting with other races, which at least I think needs to change, just look at the Reach, not the Forsworn, they're obviously far too crazy, but look at the injustices suffered by the native populace, or as they're called, Reachmen, its not the Stormcloaks, its just Nords, and the Stormcloaks support the old Nord way of doing things, which is taking control of things and antagonizing and pretty much putting to borderline slavery the non-Nords, even if they're the local populace.

And for those who say the Stormcloaks are for religious freedom, they're not, all they want to do is to worship Talos and go back to the old Nord way of doing things, which is basically fighting over some of the more basic things when you could at least talk it out. That's why Ulfric is wanted for murder, because the Empire doesn't believe you can simply kill your king just to become king yourself. With the religion thing, look at how they are hypocritically oppressing the natives of the Reach and keeping them from worshipping what they want to, IMO if your going to side with either the Empire or the Stormcloaks for religious freedom, you might as well side with the Empire since they don't have as nearly a bad history when it comes to oppressing people, WGC not withstanding.

And could you speak a little clearer? Its kinda hard to understand what you're saying when you don't use commas or much else.