Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20150415101511/@comment-4984687-20150423093709

Madman97 wrote: Don't see how creating a usergroup for honored users is pointless, Sajuuk. The point is to honor them. Yeah, I admit it is a bit flashier than a simple pat on the back, but how else would we show public appreciation for GramsJ if we take away her rights, name color, ect. other than just among those who already knew her? I understand the security reasons in regards to her rights, and that is a perfectly reasonable argument for removing them, but the question is how will people even know she existed at one time on this wiki? I don't think a user clinking her name and seeing she is no longer active, and fighting cancer, is that big of a waste of time, maybe a minute at the most, and of no real inconvenience.

I'm just throwing some things around to think about if the consensus goes either way. A blog post would be appropriate. All past staff are documented by the "Inactive ____" on their TESW pages. I'm not sure what a usergroup would do either.