Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20140330060001/@comment-16047389-20140331153534

The incidents that Zippertrain has outline above are concerning, but given the amount of time that has elapsed since similar ones have occured, I feel it would be unfair to judge based on them alone. If someone is to have privileges taken away based on their behavior, it should be something recent since a person can generally change after an extended period of time. I also do not believe that inactivity is in itself punishable offense. We certainly want staff to be active, but there is a certain paradox that goes along with this thinking that should be considered. By eliminating staff for being inactive, the activity of staff only decreases further, as we are now down an additional staff member. I feel that if a person should have their powers removed, it should be because their contributions are detrimental, not minimal.

But, at the same time I see how many other users believe that inactivity is a valid reason. I won't argue over whether or not it is, but I felt that I had to get my two cents out there. Despite whatever views are had on it today, Jimeee's contributions have been invaluable in the past and he desereves that much at the very least.