Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-4544033-20150520003550/@comment-26197005-20150520050614

So my question would be: are we nominating articles that we consider to be "good" for being our "featured" articles? Because if we are, than I am all for there being only one standard. My reason being, we can then point to our other "good" articles and say see this is an article which we can feature. As it already meets our highest standards. If being "good" is a step bellow being featured, then no, I do not agree.

If the real question is: should a good article also be a fetured article? Then my question is: why do we have both? What does being featured mean?

I would like to know more before I cast my vote.

Remember: knowing is half the battle, the rest is all lasers...

Nomar, the Nomarian