Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-10789912-20151024212957

Zippertrain85 wrote: Bronkiin wrote: No matter what you think of Saj, I feel you need far more concrete evidence to ban someone for a year. He can definitely come off as rude, touchy or whatever, but that's not a reason to remove editing rights (I'm not suggesting that is why they were removed. I do anticipate it as a reason to keep the ban in place). I do not think the block is valid. Agreed, neither side in my opinion has complete evidence for their position, so in the sake of fairness we should assume Innocent Until Proven Guilty with Sajuuk and atleast lower his Year Long ban, and throw in some Talk Page editing as well (why was that banned for him too?) All respectable systems run on Innocent Until Proven Guilty, and anyone whom says otherwise has no respect for policy, our rules, or basic human interaction.