Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-32767830-20190908182120/@comment-25646820-20191001014851

73.Anon.52 wrote: DaBarkspawn wrote: Just as a general principle, I think we should avoid ESO-specific rules when possible. Consistency is to use the same rule everywhere. It would be consistent to call a spade a spade though... the numbered games and any game not online will have defined end dates and minimal alterations, ESO just keeps going till it's too outdated to support, this means constant changes and inconsistencies are the norm and to be expected while the others remain static. Anything else that is online only should get the same treatment, but atm only ESO seems to have the staying power to fill that rule.

I think if you want call ESO a spade, then you have to call the main line of games hearts, Blades as diamonds and Legends as clubs. The point being that the wiki is a pack of cards entire, it isn't here to support any one of the suits in particular. I also think that "the numbered games and any game not online will have defined end dates and minimal alterations" misses the point of the The Real Barenziah example, because it was significantly later in Morrowind that the book was radically abbreviated from its Daggerfall form. Change has happened in other books over series of games as well.