Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-92.251.228.132-20141108020915/@comment-26332923-20151113212904

Bone-Abbacus wrote: Platinum Luffy wrote: Why not? It is. It is always the simplest things that are true. Even when someone says "childish" when you're doing something out of your will, it comes out to be true. These are the most rational. Also, you don't need "evidence" for this. You're being too dependent. You can figure this out for yourself. If you're having a philosophical debate with the purpose of convincing someone else that what you feel is an objective truth (which appears to be your position) yes, you need evidence. It's a fundamental building block of any logical debate.

Conversely I could point to the countless societal examples of children even from the earliest stages of their lives displaying an acute lack of morality (or even an understanding of the concept itself) which points to the "evidence" of my position. But I would never try to spin that as an objective, universal truth. But based on the evidence, it is true for me. No i don't. You're dependent on something that is wrong. I know the truth, and that's all that matters. Evidence as a concept is wrong.