Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-26074798-20151029215715

CynicalEarth Wrote: Future arguments shall be ignored -- the majority has last say. What? My question still hasn't been answered. I dont have a lot of time to write another two paragraphs, so I throw my old post down again: Wait, I still haven't seen the evidence. And usercheck isn't enough-it's not always accurate. With that, we'd have to assume Innocence Until Proven Guilty and good faith. Unless we get some facts in here that Sajuuk deserves to be banned due to sockpuppeting, we should not leave him banned.

I gave this some thought, we only banned him for sockpuppeting, we only need to debate sockpuppeting. If we want to get rid of him so bad, we should debate that later, not right now. Right now should be just for this issue. Let's take it one step at a time. You don't carve a whole ship out of one tree, you put it together. And by the way, saw Wulf's post. Yeah, I've been talking to Sajuuk, I'd figure that'd get said at one point in time. Honestly, I am unsure if we should ban him or not, I feel we still need proof. I even told you that Wulf-. I haven't seen much of this proof, just a bunch of Timeion saying something that I havn't seen. SuperSajuuk can't use talkpages here either (and besides from my sandbox, I'm not active anywhere but here) so I don't think it can quite be seen as shady to contact me where I am.