Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20151024212230/@comment-26896471-20151024230734

RenzXVI wrote: Just because the supposed alt account posted on Sajuuk's wall doesn't mean it's not an alt. He COULD be talking to himself specially since A Wkia contributor does talk like Sajuuk, using the terms "Sysop" which Sajuuk always insists instead of saying "admin". SuperSajuuk talking to A Wkia contributor is NOT a valid evidence that they are different people using different accounts.

To what Wulfharth was saying, I'd agree that he is rude on a lot of threads/CTs that he posts in (which I have read) but I don't have that much knowledge about forum rules to say that he does deserve a 1 year ban, he MAY not deserve that, but I do not know if it's because he doesn't really violate policy or because no one simply punished him for it. I am in no position to make comments on his wiki block, But...

Regarding his behavior in chat, prior to his ban he had been warned about a lot of stuff, Cheatcodechamp had warned him about using NumidiumBot to send vulgar messages to other users, I have warned him about using NumidiumBot too much in a short period of time then when the bot disappeared Sajuuk started using a lot of smileys (possibly to replace his fun with NumidiumBot), he complains about a lot of things in a rude way and had been insulting several users to the point that Atvelonis and G0LD3NF1RE had warned him about it (a day before his ban) but he still went on until he got banned from chat. IMO he had been lucky he wasn't banned sooner from chat, his behavior there is bad. If he breaks policy on chat, he probably does the same on the wiki since it's all due to his general behavior. IMO, his actions on the wiki could/should be looked at to prove if he did get away with other offenses like what Wulfharth has been saying. I also agree with what CynicalEarth said, if Sajuuk had disappeared and reappeared repeatedly on this wiki due to trouble and still behaves the same, he should know better.

Note: I am not saying disliking him is enough to get rid of him, I am saying that I believe he does violate wiki policy which somehow slips through and it deserves to be looked into since a lot of people are pointing it out. We all agree on the ban from chat, but that's not what's being debated. We are saying that while the Chat ban is just, the one year ban from all editing is excessive.