Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-24325144-20150106201659/@comment-4544033-20150123214733

Madman97 wrote: I believe it is good to have good faith, but not so it is solely the reason a person is chosen, even if they have shown good skills. However, I am sure there are flaws with both arguments presented within the chat dicussion, so here is what I think should happen.

There are some candidates who are open for the spot, and in order to see exactly what they have in mind for their future vision (Going off of your idea, Aldmeri), is that these candidates should create a new thread where they present their cases on what they hold in store and people will have the oppurtunity to critique.

I can see the benefit of this, my only concern is turning this into a election. I see no harm in somebody representing their views, but I have never been a fan of people almost campaigning themselves, I saw wikiawnsers finish itself off doing this.

We would need to set of a set group of questions for a "candidate" to answer, as well as allowing people to ask them questions relating to that person. Once this was done, we open up the polls/discussions (whatever) to decide if they should be Admin. This would require help from our news team and the community.