User blog comment:Zippertrain85/The reasons why Serana is not from the First Era./@comment-9156240-20130508234036/@comment-9062114-20130510021330

Oh my God. I'm sorry, this is complete nonsense. I'll explain why

When did it say Valerica came to the Soul Carin in the First Era?

No, he wasen't. I wrote a whole blog on why he couldn't have possibly been a king. Go read it if you want to know.

Basless assumption.

You know he ran a Vampire Clan, right? I highly dobut he had time to practice all of this when he had to be the king to all the Vampires. It's just common sense. HE WASEN'T ROALTY! HE WASEN'T A KING OF ANYTHING! Sorry, but I'm sick of hearing this. Please go read my blog about why Harkon wasen't a king. If you want to debate that, do it on there please.

Do you know any person that could use words to literally put an image an exact image of someone in their head? I don't think so. The likleness that this would be true is next to impossible.

The majorirty of people thought the Earth was flat a long time ago, does that means they were right? No! Universal consensus does NOT equal truth. That's a poor argument. Those people might not be aware of the things I brought up (I'm not trying to sound Arrogant, I'm really not). Or they could be wrong, just because the majority thinks something does not make it right.

Nothing that existed back then was like that. These Renisance like castles. The culture that became like that was the Bretons, who didn't exist in the early First Era. Also, things like Marble were not common in Skyrim. Iron and Steel are, that's why Nords use them with their buildings and weapons. So they must've gotten imports, but back then their was virtually no one the Nords could trade with.

I'm not trying to sound coindescending, but these arguments were weak. Most of them are based off the assumption that Harkon was a king, which I wrote a blog on showing why it's almost impossible for him to be.