Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-10789912-20151109180419

I know what you are thinking- this consensus has been done twice beforehand, but that was in a different time, before our modern userbase moved in. Many times we have all spoken about this, and every time we came to a unanimous agreement- that the user rights of GramsJ should be removed.

Policy of inactive administrators states that after a month of inactivity, the user's rights will be removed, and they can attempt to regain them later. This is where the issue comes it. GramsJ is an "Honored Editor", and we all know what that boils down to. She has died of her illness.

This creates a morality issue for some users, whom don't want to appear as if they are insensitive to the dead, especially a cancer victim. I will ask that you leave morality based arguments off of this thread, do to the fact '''morals are not static, and are different for every user. They hold no ground in a discussion.'''

My proposition is one simple thing, that will permanently fix this issue for the wiki.

Removal of GramsJ's Rights, placement of a "monument", perhaps a funerary thread, on her profile

This is agreement we all reached multiple times in chat, and the one this thread is created in support of. The rights, by policy, are supposed to be removed, and should have been long ago. Due to GramsJ's fight with cancer, we allowed a lot of time to return. I'm going to break a stunning revelation to you all. She is either dead, or has bigger things to worry about and doesn't care about the wiki.

A monument of this type would be much more personal, and much more of a "thank you" than leaving her rights attached to her profile. A place where users that knew her could post little thoughts, and one that would solidify the memory of this user on the wiki.

I'm hoping that this thread will reach a final choice on the matter. 