Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-28664595-20160605220956/@comment-26893431-20160606235626

Bronkiin wrote: Agreed, it should be taken with a grain of salt. That is a bit of a step back from saying it has no place on the wiki. It does. But we flag it quite strongly as being OOG and needs treating with skepticism. The point is that you really can't see which parts of an article belong to one source and which belong to the other. I don't even know why it's added if it should be taken with a grain of salt.

Tell me, if it's not published by Bethesda, nor used by Bethesda, why should it have a place on the wiki regarding the lore from a game from Bethesda? If it's unconfirmed, nor used why does it have a place here? Because it's about the Elder Scrolls universe? Does that mean that I can write an article based on my own story and just say these are OOG sources? Because to me that sounds a little bit.... off....