Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-26213507-20150928140042/@comment-25513154-20151021235440

Phantasys wrote: LLamakingGod&amp;7 wrote: Oh my self, this again. Hey you "guys" know Heimskr? Do you "guys" know MK? You know those words Heimskr says... Exactly...there's a reason why the original code of the game had Balgruff and Elisif die. There's still even dialogue from guards if you kill Elisif via console commands.

Hell, General Tullius still threatens to throw you in prison even if there's no realistic bountry system. Yep the game wasn't even finished. Mk the guy would came up with the civil war quest which is really the main '''Theme/quest of the whole game pointed out that there is no Empire. Basically stating your player is a rebel fighting the Dominion and there puppets.'''

'''Do people understand this? The game Skyrim isn't even "Finished". Massive cuts were made causing a chain reaction breaking basically all quest "immersion" or lore friendlyness of the game. '''

People would start whinning about how the game seems a lot like the Witcher 2. Being focused on a guy of one race dragonborn killing the dead empire and the Thalmore....Heck the player still kills Thalmore which would get him a bounty from Elenwen, which in turn would be sent to Tullius. But logic like that can't be in because it would kill the dough.

In order for Beth to shake in the dough they cut the "immersion" of the game to catch casual gamers and such. Secondly they were out of time and theres no dening that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/teslore/comments/1ypzzk/is_there_a_reason_why_the_imperial_dragon_emblem/

Yet again Mk did this part of the game for them. While still not fully working for them. Got that?