Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4799587-20140926205622/@comment-768817-20140928220031

Lab Coat Billy wrote: If they take it away without consensus/with a consensus in which they ignore overwhelming opposition, that does give us the right to consensus an Admin for refusing to listen to the community. Not saying we should trade eyes for eyes, of course, but if the majority speaks and the admins ignore them, it would probably be a good idea to replace said admin. In the end, this is not a democracy, they can do what they well please, as long as it doesn't break the Terms & Services policy (Which has nothing in it about being fair, or caring about the wiki.).

Cheatcodechamp wrote: Ok so again, are there any ideas you guys have that involve everybody walking away content? I see the valid points of both sides, and if there are valid sides on both fronts then we should come up with a middle unless I am missing something. I'm worried there might not be a middle road. This is kind of an all or nothing situation. One idea, the administration could of done, would have been encouraging more RPs to be on ESRP wiki, and Sandbox Wiki, as to slowly and peacefully remove their problem, and everyone would have been happy, but they have already crossed the Rubicon, on this one, (Or the Colorado, if you're into Fallout.) and there's no going back.