Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131113224543/@comment-25047024-20140102014244

Octo8 wrote: 218.186.253.148 wrote: Ok, why don't we all stop arguing on MK's work and try to not use it. Because, in the case when the authenticity of a premise is called into question, it is better to drop it and proceed, as trying to include it can lead to further, non productive arguments, flame wars and possibly a vitroil throwing.

P.S. I do agree with Ralok on the point that MK cannot be taken seriously after he left beth, unless beth itself takes his work, also, Mead Drinker did raise a good point suggesting why MK may or may not be right. Its pretty safe to assume that MK is 50% right and 50% wrong.

"Oh hey guy, why not just drop this silly disussion, and instead do what is my take on the matter?"

Yeah... no. The solution goes the other way round: If Ralok or you don't like MK's works, stay out of discussions involving them.

@AES:

FWIW, from his forum posts MK seems a bit... unsympathetic. A bit too try-hard, and maybe also a bit too arrogant. Also he might *behave* like a fanfic writer at times, especially when it concerns Vivec. But of course, that changes nothing about the arguments why his works are in fact canonic.

Yeah, he seems to be a bit too... defending sometimes. But I'm sure he knows that a lot of people misunderstand his work the whole time and say stuff like "his work isn't canon/is bad/etc". He also probably explained the same things about Vivec thousands of times to users who didn't understand him, so...

Although he really is a bit unsympathetic, at times.