Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-26893431-20190205174447

Hello folks, Jauffre here.

In the Moot of January I brought up the way we cover Creation Club content and that it might be time for a change. I had forgotten to check the older Moot logs, and apparently a decisions was made regarding the way we cover its content in the past.

So, I've decided to instead put my idea out here, and see how the community responds to it.

For those of us who somehow don't know what Creation Club content is, they are ingame purchases available for. They are official content, both licensed, published, and checked by Bethesda, and created by a combination of modders and official Bethesda staff.

When we created the page for Creation Club, it was agreed to limit its content down to own page. For a long time, this was fine, Creation Club didn't really offer much in regards to content worthy of its own page. Now, however, it appears that some of its creations are a bit better, and larger, than its old ones. And considering the players on Playstation are not permitted mods, this is one of the only ways for them to obtain additional content. I'd consider it fair for these players if they are able to obtain the knowledge required before they make a purchase.

Think of the "Forgotten Seasons" and "Civil War Champions" creations, which are more in-depth than some of the older content of CC. For this reason, I suggest that each creation from CC is permitted a page in which its content is explained, possibly with additional pages for items, characters, etc. within the creation itself.

A counter argument for the latter that could be made is the amount of content CC would add. But considering the fact that a lot of Crown Store pets, mounts, and costumes also have their own individual page (while largely being no more than cosmetics) I personally do not support said argument.

Still, the main point of this CT topic is if we should change the way we cover Creation Club content. Should we keep it the way it is now, or change it over to permit it to be covered more in-depth? Perhaps some sort of middle-ground? 