Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140808194933/@comment-12.23.90.195-20140810140838

SuperSajuuk wrote: It is kinda funny that the anon IP thinks the messages on my talkpage are relevant to this CT. If they are relevant, all they do is bolster the evidence in the CT, rather than act against it. Can we stop grasping at straws to find reasons to oppose, it's pretty obvious that people are doing that. Also, I like how some random guy opposes and accuses people of making sockpuppets to vote.

@U.F.B.: The reason there's few editors is because anyone decent has been scared away by some users of this wiki. Plus, we need to have editors on ESO but hardly anyone here has the game to create content. It is absolutely relevant because the interaction ban on your talk page shows it wasn't a one time incident. There was a history of issues with the user and thus they weren't banned for two weeks for one little comment but for the history of comments. In real life if you commit three small crimes, going to jail after each one, the last time you go to jail for a long time, because you have shown you cannot learn from your mistakes. The user was previously warned and continued to use personal attacks. That is why your talk page it relevant, because without it, you don't know the history of the situation. The ban was clearly justified. Other people have posted the same thing about the other ban. Clearly both bans were appropriate once you know the history of the people involved.