The Elder Scrolls Wiki:Moot/2015 July 11


 * This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on its Talk Page or new Consensus track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. Please do not modify it. Emperor Jarjarkine  Aldmeri_Dominion.png  The Ragged Flagon - Cistern  13:54, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

Log

 * July 11, 2015 (Text)
 * Moot Leader: Cheatcodechamp

Agenda
The Moot went a little differently this week. Unlike the last two meetings, this one had no planed agenda. So we went over several projects related to Elder scrolls.

Changes

 * 1) Our wiki will continue to support the Interwiki project. It is out hope to get community's involved in each others success. By helping each other, we are helping ourselves. We are still looking for wikis to help in this project.
 * 2) We Talked about use of the IRC. The community present acknowledged that the IRC has several features that would help the IRC, but we felt that using chat will allow more people to get involved, mainly newer editors and those on handheld devices. We have decided that the IRC will remain as a backup, should the chat be to active or if errors occur that prevent use of the chat.
 * 3) We talked about the Guilds Project. We as a wiki should assist in making sure the project remains active. Teams of editors have shown to help articles to a great extent. We as a community will work on getting the guilds better put out in the community to assist in member activity and numbers.
 * 4) We are going to look for more ways to increase our image as a community. We may have passed some stressful times as a community, but those times left a reputation. We should continue in a friendly manner to help gamer's with their questions and problems, and will continue using sites such as Facebook to spread the word that this wiki is here and ready to help.
 * 5) We voted on an issue relating to a past CT. We decided awhile back to allow trivia to contain some speculation. However, members of the Reddit community pointed out that some of the speculation is not even properly sourced. We are returning to the past policy where trivia needs to be sourced. I want to thank the Reddit community for its constructive feedback.