User blog comment:Zippertrain85/Do people hate me on this Wiki?/@comment-11296535-20140111182330/@comment-13446185-20140112220310

'If you can't handle when people question things you say, then you probably shouldn't even talk about lore on here anymore. Beliefs are questioned, what you think isn't always right, acting like it somehow would make me a bod moterator is absurd. ' There is a fine line between questioning the lore and outright saying that the lore is wrong. There is overwhelming evidence that the Volikhar clan existed during or before the first era, and in turn no real reason to question it. I have no problem with you arguing about the Civil War and stuff like that, but when you start trying to go against established lore, that crosses the line, especially when their is barely any inconsistencies to question. The reason why I think you will be a bad moderator is not because of your beliefs but rather because you aren't ever willing to abandon your beliefs even when their is overwhelming evidence that proves them wrong. Basically I feel like you need to stop saying lore is wrong just because it contradicts what you think is right, in other words when you actually want to defend your argument don't do it with absurd assumptions such as this "How do you know he wasen't being sheltered? He obviously had connections with Necromancers, they could've hidden him." which have absolutely no lore backing them (There is no lore that connects him to normal necromancers, he is just a dragon who practices necromancy, he learned everything he knows from the Ideal Masters, who trapped him). Back your arguments with actual lore, if you can't do that then you are probably wrong; and for gods sakes don't take my accusations personally, I'm not attacking you.

'No, you didn't refute what I said on that blog in the least, you just ignored my evidence and repeated the same stuff I hear from Lore Fundamentalists all the time. '

Funny thing, I did not ignore your evidence, literally everthing I posted was a response to something you said (If you don't believe me then look a line above you, that's exactly what I was doing on your Blog); if you're referring to that last post you had, I decided to not even bother answering that as it had almost no lore backing it (that was when it came apparent to me that you are willing to go against lore just to prove that you are right). I also did not repeat anything at all, I have no idea where you pulled that from; and by saying "same stuff I hear from Lore Fundamentalists all the time" are you implying that lore shouldn't be followed?

If you want me to refute the evidence you had at the end of your blog I can.

'How do you know he wasen't being sheltered? He obviously had connections with Necromancers, they could've hidden him.'

Well first of all I already explained why the necromancer thing is not believable in my first response.

Second of all saying that he was being sheltered would go against the fact that he fought with other dragons often, a sheltered dragon would be in hiding and not able to fight lest it risk blowing its cover.

'it could've also skipped over Denehviir since he went to the Soul Carin by the time the book was written. '

Well that would contradict your evidence that the Volikhars date to the Interregnum as the book Atlas of Dragons was written in 2E 373. Which is before the Interregnum.