Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-6941549-20140215223715/@comment-24325144-20140216102705

I think that there should be a re-evaluation of all members of staff. To see if they actually do what is asked of them. Also, add effective requirements of all staff members. Mods I feel, just like admins should be active in the wiki as a whole. In the forums, in the chat, & in the mainspace. For chat mods I do think even if a mod nominates somebody that the person in question contributions should be looked at. Also by how they act in chat, how they act in the forums, (if they go there) & how they act in the mainspace (if they go there). I do think there should be edit requirements, & how long they have been on the wiki, for all staff positions before they can be nominated. In all thruthfulness I shouldn't have been a chat mod, I didn't have the required edits, & I haven't been on the wiki long enough even now. I think for any staff position they should have 750 edits, & been the wiki for 3 months at least, they act maturely & have good spelling & grammar. As for the re-evaluation of staff, I think a complete re-evaluation should be done for all staff, (chat mod) (forum mod) (patroller) (admin). Through that, the users who don't  do their duties, are never online, or are bad mods in general should lose their powers. So that others can take those positions instead. That's my view on it, others might disagree & that's fine. On that note however, Tomb I do believe you should remove my chat mod powers, as I won't be on the wiki anymore thank you.