Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-3076045-20140314133348/@comment-24635935-20140324014726

Contributor 62 wrote: Jacen Veron wrote: Does this mean we will have a secondary vote? I would say that the people most involved in the idea of creating a guild for the wiki members, and of putting that idea into practice, and of setting up the voting system and the first name ideas (like yourself or Timeoin or others), should always have heaviest and final word on such decisions. The rest should be well considered ofcourse, but mostly for information and advise and opinion. This is a democracy, especially when voting. Timeoin, me and others have just as equal a say in this as everyone else. Also, Timeoin stated that one oppose is all it would take to cause a secondary vote, however, it should have signifigant backup to it. As it stands, its one opposed to twenty-one supporting and two neutral. So at this point, the oppose will need serious logical backup and/or more than just one oppose to counter the shear number of supports.