Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-209.217.122.137-20151004221600/@comment-27095143-20151228232027

LDuka wrote: High King Emeric wrote: 209.217.122.137 wrote: I'm getting some conflicting messages from the wiki. Are the Aedra and Daedra classified as the beings formed from the spilled blood of Anu + Padomay and Padomay, respectively, or are they classified by their involvement in the creation of Mundus? It seems unlikely that the et'Ada created from only Padomay's blood just so happened to be all the et'Ada to refuse/dismiss the creation of Mundus, and vice versa with the Aedra. Well, nothing is certain. I think the best thing to do is to let it go, or believe one of the hundreds of thories. I believe that Anu and Padomay created the Aedra and Padomay solo created the Daedra. Of course, what about Talos, or Malacath, or....? Yes, there is no certain definition. Talos was born mortal, like every men. No big deal there.

And Malacath was created like all Aedra and Daedra, no big deal there. It is the AFTER, that concerns us. Talos has possibly ascended to godhood. Malacath was an Aedra, called Trinimac once.