Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-9062114-20140111214003/@comment-9062114-20140111221547

Goldflame33 wrote: Zippertrain85 wrote: Goldflame33 wrote: Zippertrain85 wrote: Goldflame33 wrote: If you think people voted against you purely because they didn't like you, then you probably don't deserve the position in the first place. Kind of a one-sided of looking at that don't you think? I really don't. Forum Moderators often need to end arguements, and that can only be done by looking at multiple perspectives. Calling my view one-sided means you didn't stop and think about my perspective. You're right in the way that I should look at both sides, and I do. I looked at your side, and thought you were being one-sided assuming that just because I was rejected, it had to have been the right choice. Again, why does this only apply when I do it? Then you must not have looked hard enough. And even if people voted against you because they didn't like you (which no one did) they must have a good reason as to why they don't like you. Do you have any inkling as to what that might be? How do you know no one did? Do you know them personally? I stand by my point assuming they must've had a good reason to oppose myself or someone else and that it couldn't possibly be due to bias is somewhat one-sided.