Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-26248987-20160107050227/@comment-25078513-20160913142438

Blademaster Jauffre wrote: MNA wrote: Uh...no, I don't really think so. Not broadly. And human history is not one of 'forgive and forget.' Really, take your pick historically.

Regardless, I'm not disputing that the Thalmor did that, just questioning why that would mean that an Argonian Dragonborn would or would not join the Stormcloaks. Never heard of any problems by the ones that were the actual slaves, the only ones you hear complain about slavery in real life are the people who weren't even around when it was a thing.

Because Black Marsh has no hatred for the Empire. Wha...? Are you seriously claiming there are no real long term reprucussions on our society from the legacy of slavery?

More to the point, look at places like Yugoslavia, or the Middle East, where ethnic feuds go back over a thousand years. People don't forget.

With regards to Black Marsh and the Empire...even if I give you that, so what? Does that preclude an Argonian from being sympathetic to the Stormcloaks? Or wanting to weaken the foreign power on their border?

In the case of a Dragonborn Argonian BTW, the larger issue might be the crisis of faith he or she would suffer from the claim that they have the soul of a dragon bestowed by Akatosh. It would be hard to square with Argonian religion.