Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-24274106-20140302212243

Due to the recent spike in chat ban mishaps, I feel we need a better way to deal with disputes. The current system of "go tell an admin"  isn't  very conveniant for anyone, as admins do not see the incident take place, and they also probably have better stuff to do (IE: Keeping the wiki running). I propose that when a "perma-ban" is issued, or if there is sufficient doubt in the necessity of the ban, that the facts should be presented in a similar manner to Ikabite's "Case of Jyggalag". This will not only stop arguments from flooding the chat, but could also help prevent arguments by showcasing the facts and providing a neutral evaluation of the incident.

All cases will be compiled by the moderator who administered the ban, and will be voted on and discussed by us, the users.

Any comments/feedback will be appreciated.

 