Board Thread:Consensus track/@comment-7153552-20130927224851/@comment-7153552-20130928194740

Flightmare wrote:

PsijicThief wrote:

As for the contribution requirements, what if we altered it to say at least 50, and notate that X amount or percent need to be non-minor? Can be tricky, any user fixing 100 links or other very small errors would not validate with such reasoning. Lots of minor contributions can be some major jump forward in many ways.

And we are talking about the contributions in a 30-day window. The original guideline doesn't say anything about recent edits, just overall. Perhaps if we were to raise the number somewhere between 50-75 minor or major wouldn't be a determining factor. At that point we would just need to take a gander if said edits were apparent badge hunting.