User blog comment:Aramithius/Anuic/Padomaic Re-Examined, and Found Wanting/@comment-28642724-20170819114200

It's all well and good, Aramithiius, but how would you come about "Change" (Or Padomay as a physical rep.) If we take The_Truth_in_Sequence as an argumentative point? It would mean that there is no Padomay, and so what would that make the term "Padomaic" itself? An illusion? A self-pity upon those who want natural change and linearity? Also, a less interpretable question...what would this make Anu if he had no other? How would "Change" kill Nir, in a metaphorical sense?