Board Thread:Community Announcements and Events/@comment-4544033-20150322005151/@comment-26017205-20150324092024

SuperSajuuk wrote:

Wulfharth wrote: 3) Even if you do switch to using a Lore namespace, there is a huge amount of work associated with that. For one, people will need to go through ALL the existing pages and re-link ALL the links to the lore namespace. A bot can't do this. Yeah, I can't see anyone jumping at the change to do that exciting job.

4) Best solution, keep using the "Pagename (Lore)" system. Its not perfect, but its much less work. This will be my last post on this matter, but I found this a little insulting. It's not going to be a lot of work, we don't have tons of lore articles and very few articles link to them in the first place. If it's really a problem, there's a script that would help in mass-updating the links in a simple manner. Also, I would have no problems doing the work myself, it's not something that will get done overnight.

Anyway, if someone wants to start a lore namespace discussion, fine. There are a huge number of lore pages: Lore Characters has 400 alone. Some overlap with the games of course, but if you are going to do a lore namespace there is not sense in doing it half right - that means moving all the lore info on the game specific pages to their own lore page in the lore namespace.

Then, the script can only mass update links, but a human needs to determine if the link should point to a game specific page or a lore page. Either way, you need to ask yourself if this is worth all the work. Personally I'd prefer more info on ESO, but thats me.