Board Thread:Lore Discussion/@comment-24.44.141.89-20131113224543/@comment-218.186.253.148-20140102024108

I never said he wasn't canon, read the last part, he is but a historian. I tried to write it as clearly as possible but still seems like my opinion is open to interpretation...

Just because you don't use it doesn't mean its not canon or outright wrong, but its simply a conciliatory gesture to those who don't buy it. Lets say you are the skaal shaman. Just because you have the knowledge that the all maker is real doesn't mean you go around screaming he is real, or that your skaal religion is correct.

I am saying if someone says MK is wrong it is not right to outright discredit them, cause MK could indeed be wrong. Plus, i never said you can't use 'MK references, just don't use those that are too contentious, controversial or lore distorting, especially those that many do not believe in, because it will end up as an argument of the premise rather than conclusion.