Board Thread:Consensus Track/@comment-1251315-20140808194933/@comment-24274106-20140809200308

EmperorJohnson wrote: Likes-That-Tail wrote:

Lazarus Grimm wrote:

EmperorJohnson wrote: When people have been recommended for mod, the recommender has never stated the things wrong with the person he has recommended - so why should it be different from a consensus to demote someone? Jimeee has really, just edited and been an asshole to most users of the chat and wikia in general. The evidence speaks for itself, and if any of the supporters had a problem with how the consensus is set out, why haven't they stated? Oh..because they don't.

Helping is good an all, but helping an old women across the road can't be used to help you in court if you assaulted two people in the middle of the street There are 26 supports to this consensus before Jimeee has even gotten the chance to defend himself. This is like bringing the prosecutor into the court room, him giving his case to the jurors, and then the jurors all saying "he's guilty" before the defendant can say a word. It just isn't fair.