I think that the dragonborn should follow a "no masters" choice in the civil war, clearly Ulfric and Elisif are not suitable for the throne. So maybe the dragonborn should restore the peace and unite My opinion..
I think that the dragonborn should follow a "no masters" choice in the civil war, clearly Ulfric and Elisif are not suitable for the throne. So maybe the dragonborn should restore the peace and unite My opinion..
then i assume you have better options hm ?
Honestly, instead of making it a wrong/wrong choice, when that choice alters the game's lore to cause headaches in later games.. Why didn't they only make one side of that quest?
Stormcloak supporters wouldn't exist is Ulfric Stormcloak assassinated Torygg
Legion supporters wouldn't exist if the Legions were the ones that were enforcing the Talos ban
To me, they really painted themselves into a corner for any TES game that comes after Skyrim. Either way, about half of their player base is going to feel alienated.
Stormcloak supporters wouldn't exist is Ulfric Stormcloak assassinated Torygg
Legion supporters wouldn't exist if the Legions were the ones that were enforcing the Talos ban
To me, they really painted themselves into a corner for any TES game that comes after Skyrim. Either way, about half of their player base is going to feel alienated.
i know but what i meant was the player has the choice to eigther help evey one, help them but with power,or fall in the same hole as miraak did because you eigther die a hero or you live long enougth to see your self become the villan
but i think so the players can have a choice of on whoms side they whant to be. but it would be nice to have the choice to just go like " bitches let figth later and now kick the thalmors arse"
Spidermanfromthe60s wrote:
Stormcloak supporters wouldn't exist is Ulfric Stormcloak assassinated Torygg
Legion supporters wouldn't exist if the Legions were the ones that were enforcing the Talos ban
To me, they really painted themselves into a corner for any TES game that comes after Skyrim. Either way, about half of their player base is going to feel alienated.
but i think so the players can have a choice of on whoms side they whant to be. but it would be nice to have the choice to just go like " bitches let figth later and now kick the thalmors arse"
I kind of wish that too, there isn't a faction I hate more than the thalmor, I don't care for killing the stormcloaks and imperials, I want to just kill the Thalmor, then they can do whatever the hell they want.
I would have thought there would be an option to become Thane of all the regions, or a majority and then when a moot was called the Dragonborn would be the clear choice.
And you want to controle the province with wich army? Why is everyone obsessed with becoming High King, Jarl or Emperor. You are playing as an adventurer. Not a fat, old, dirty nobleman.
well so was the courier in new vegas guess what..he singel-handedly took over new vegas...
now the dragonborn who clearly saved skyrim from the judgement day (and whole nirn) should kind off...you know..get something in return..in oblivion you became the champion of cyrodiil for christ sake..thats a pretty high title...now the dragonborn should have the options to become high king..its seems pretts fair and well...elisif and ulfric arent made to rule...dragons however...the were made to rule
Well, in a way it would make sense if the Dragonborn became the emperor to continue the dragonborn lineage, however for the sake of storyline, the Elder Scrolls were not made for you to become ruler, you just have a very high influence on who becomes ruler, or you have some big title.