Just Found a website that had leaked the dragonbone weapons. Here is the link.
- We already know, but we can't use any leaked images.
- Oh, Should I take them down if I added them as photos?
- You can craft arrows now?18.104.22.168 06:52, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know if a Dragonbone Crossbow will also be added to the game? (That is assuming that crossbows will be of different materials) 22.214.171.124 15:13, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
Strength of the weapon
Actually the only thing they surpass Daedric Weaponry in is weight. As far as damage goes Daedric is better. After looking at the damage ratings for both sets of weapons you could easily see that.
The base attack of the Daedric Sword is 14. The base attack of the Dragonbone Sword is 15. Um, I do believe 15 is a higher number than 14, so yes, the Dragonbone Weapons are stronger. Evnyofdeath 21:22, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
It would be rather odd to have the Dragonbone weaponry be heavier but deal less damage. I also believe it about time to create more deadlier weapons than the overappreciated Daedric ones. Dinner Sorcerer (talk) 20:55, August 1, 2012 (UTC)Dinner Sorcerer
This page should mention the fact that a mod for the base game has existed since around the beginning of the year that allows Dragonbone Weapons to be crafted.
Can Dragonbone Armor and Weapons be crafted without having Dawnguard? 126.96.36.199 22:16, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
- nope, sorry.Jimeee (talk) 22:40, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
- So is there any point to keeping Dragon Bones and Scales or should I just sell them? And if so, to who? 188.8.131.52 21:48, April 10, 2013 (UTC)
I would like to point out that the item IDs for the Dragonbone weapons should be edited. Dawnguard isn't in index 02 for everyone in their installation of Skyrim (for example, my Dawnguard.esm is in slot 03 because I have the Unofficial Skyrim Patches installed and loaded directly after Skyrim.esm and Update.esm), and those should all be switched out to "XX" as it is on so many other pages concerning IDs from game expansions, for consistency's sake. I'd do it myself, but for some reason, the edit option isn't available on the article for me. Lordgeorge16 (talk) 14:59, July 30, 2014 (UTC)