Elder Scrolls
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
Elder Scrolls
Elder Scrolls
72,014
pages

Talk: The Pale Lady (Creature)

Back to page
Edit source
(Created page with "= Wrongful Undo = Atvelonis, Please explain what is "speculative" about the edit. It is a fact that she resides within The Pale. It is a fact that she is a ghost and is d...")
Tag: sourceedit
 
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Atvelonis,
 
Atvelonis,
   
  +
Please explain what is "speculative" about the edit.
⚫
Please explain what is "speculative" about the edit. It is a fact that she resides within The Pale. It is a fact that she is a ghost and is depicted in the game as having a ghostly pale appearance. Neither of those things are speculative. Then, since her name can be read in two ways: The Lady of The Pale Hold and The Lady Who Is Pale, her name is a pun. That isn't speculation either. Now it might be speculation to suggest that the pun was *intended*, but I did not say that. Please revert your undo or provide some proof that your undo isn't arbitrary. [[User:DaBarkspawn|DaBarkspawn]] <sup>([[User talk:DaBarkspawn|talk]])</sup> 04:34, December 4, 2016 (UTC)
  
  +
  +
* It is a fact that she resides within The Pale.
  +
* It is a fact that she is a ghost and is depicted in the game as having a ghostly pale appearance.
  +
  +
Neither of those things are speculative.
  +
  +
Then, since her name can be read in two ways: The Lady of The Pale Hold and The Lady Who Is Pale, her name is a pun.
  +
  +
That isn't speculation either.
  +
  ⚫
Now it might be speculation to suggest that the pun was '''intended''', but I did not say that. Please revert your undo or provide some proof that your undo isn't arbitrary. [[User:DaBarkspawn|DaBarkspawn]] <sup>([[User talk:DaBarkspawn|talk]])</sup> 04:34, December 4, 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:39, 4 December 2016

Wrongful Undo

Atvelonis,

Please explain what is "speculative" about the edit.

  • It is a fact that she resides within The Pale.
  • It is a fact that she is a ghost and is depicted in the game as having a ghostly pale appearance.

Neither of those things are speculative.

Then, since her name can be read in two ways: The Lady of The Pale Hold and The Lady Who Is Pale, her name is a pun.

That isn't speculation either.

Now it might be speculation to suggest that the pun was intended, but I did not say that. Please revert your undo or provide some proof that your undo isn't arbitrary. DaBarkspawn (talk) 04:34, December 4, 2016 (UTC)

*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms