The Elder Scrolls Wiki:Administrators/Ghost Anubis

Administrator nomination for Ghost Anubis^{Talk • Contribs • Edit count}

Ghost has been an editor ever since he joined the wiki. He did go away for a while but after his return he has been more passionate and dedicated to make the wiki much better. As a patroller he has done everything that is required and is also helping new users in directing them to the appropriate policies and have been monitoring the chat. With all the work as a patroller, plus creating new articles, adding more to existing articles, cleaning up in areas where there have been a mess for a long time, and cleaning among the redirects, he has been hindered by the absence of sysop tools. So he has had to come to me in the past, for things such as deleting pages or fixing links on protected pages.

He has also come up with ideas how to improve the wiki as I have mentioned here in the forum. I think it is well deserved for him to get the tools and I think the wiki will improve with his help. —EbonySkyrim ^Message! 14:02, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Support

 Support – As nominator. —EbonySkyrim ^Message! 14:02, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

 Support – Ghost is the best member of the wiki and he clearly has the know-how to be a good sysop on this wiki. I cannot find any reason that he should be opposed in becoming a sysop. --SuperSajuuk ^{Talk Page | Tabber Code | Channel} 14:34, September 13, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

 Neutral – You came to the wiki when I went inactive, and so I never got to know you very well. In the short-time that I have seen your influence on this wiki, I have noticed quite a few things, but only two really stand out to me:

1. You are quick to edit/deal with vandalism, you are regularly active in chat, and you are clearly and generally liked across the wiki.

2. You are hot-headed, to the point where you have personally attacked another user for simply sharing their opinion, and in a different situation, you attempted to mediate between users without understanding the full-story, nor did you even attempt to seek out an understanding. Both of these are worrisome, because should you become an administrator, you will need to be able to remain impartial as a leader.

Ultimately, the pros outweigh the cons, and my evaluation is incomplete, as it is only based off of the very short time that I have gotten to know your actions. So I abstain from voting, with my rationale left for consideration should it be desired - good luck on your request, and I will trust that you will treat the position with respect should the community decide you need the tools. :) ^{Some Assembly Required!} 14:49, September 13, 2014 (UTC)