The staff is currently undergoing re-evaluations, per community consensus. Here, active members of the community will be asked to judge our current patroller force on their activity levels. Some questions to consider before voting are:
Has this user maintained high activity levels throughout all or most of their time as patroller?
Has this user made regular and sufficient use of the tools granted to them, such as the rollback tool?
Has this user overall followed the rest of the duties of a patroller outlined on the project page?
Please be objective when voting, but remember to be respectful while doing so. Your vote should be based off the points above; how valuable each user is as a patroller specifically. Check each user's contributions for an idea of what they have been doing.
A {{Support}} vote means you support them staying in their position, a {{Neutral}} vote means you are neutral, and an {{Oppose}} vote means you support them being removed from their position. Please provide adequate reasoning for each vote, otherwise your vote will be discounted.
Existing patroller. —Atvelonis(talk) 21:48, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support[]
Support – Bron has my full support on this. He does his job and he does it exceptionally well, he remains consistent, and he enforces the rules as they need to be. I believe he is a prime example of what a Patroller should be. -Kora Stormblade(talk) 21:59, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support – Seen active edits, is active in both the Wikia and the chat, nothing negative to say. Ikabite(talk) 22:18, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support – Oppose because British. --Shockstorm (talk) 22:47, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support – He is good editor who is dedicated to the wiki and takes his position seriously. The Cat Master(talk) 00:06, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Support – One of our two active patrollers. He's always editing, and add tons of new content. If I every have a question about ESO, he usually can answer it. He's good. Ottoman HoldMessage MeMy Action12:38:34March 03, 2016
Support – Very active in the chat and in editing. Dedicated and mature. Blutbad(talk) 13:25, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Support – active on both chat and editing. deserves to stay. Ashley Kirshbaum(talk) 16:37, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Support – Bronkiin is always editing, always adding new images, always adding new content, always I can go on for a bit of time on this always nonsense but I'm not. Bronkiin monitors recent edits and uses VIP often. Following suit, he matches the rest of the qualifications. He also has quite a bit of fun reverting my edits, likely the most tedious task on the wiki. The_CrusaderTalkpage01:42:12_March 04, 2016
Existing patroller. —Atvelonis(talk) 21:48, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support[]
Support – Seen active edits, nothing negative to say. Ikabite(talk) 22:18, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support – Cat Master has been doing a great job when he edits, and he's been consistent with them too. He does his job as a Patroller well and I see no reason why he shouldn't keep his spot as one. -Kora Stormblade(talk) 22:08, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support – Despite being pressed for time, Ser Pouce clearly makes an effort to contribute regularly. He adds both content and works on maintenance. He has kept a keen eye out for vandalism and updates VIP. He's making a good effort. Bronkiin(talk) 22:26, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support – The other active patroller here. He constantly edits and adds info. He uses his tools constantly, so he's perfectly fine as a patroller. Ottoman HoldMessage MeMy Action12:38:34March 03, 2016
Support – The Cat Master is yet another active patroller here. I don't see any reason why he has not done his role as patroller to it's fullest extent. —This unsigned comment is by The Crusader of Truth (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
Support – Per above. Also I'd like to point out that forum/chat activity has never been a requirement for patroller. --Shockstorm (talk) 02:38, March 4, 2016 (UTC)
Neutral[]
Neutral – as far as I can tell, Cat Master is active at least in the forums and editing; I haven't really seen him around in just chat, but I have to say neutral on this one because I don't really have all that much positive to say, and I have no negative. Sorry, Cat Master.Blutbad(talk) 13:27, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose[]
Comment[]
Comment – I'd like to point out that a patroller's duty is not to chat or forums, but to the main space. That is why the have the roll back tool, so whether he is in chat or not I feel is irrelevant. Ottoman HoldMessage MeMy Action02:52:43March 03, 2016
Existing patroller. —Atvelonis(talk) 21:48, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support[]
Neutral[]
Neutral – Rim is not quite inactive but he's getting there. A dedication to the wiki in the past, combined with the fact that when he does edit, he's adding content and the edits themselves are bulky, leads me to see an oppose as being too hasty. Bronkiin(talk) 22:26, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Neutral – I was mixed between a support and being neutral on this. Rim does wonderful edits but I'm not sure if he's as consistent with editing as some of the others. However, I feel as if an oppose is, as Bron said, too hasty. -Kora Stormblade(talk) 22:30, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Neutral – I'm with Bron and Kora on this one. He is an excellent editor, and is always on top of new ESO DLC. however it seems as if he doesn't do enough patrolling. The Cat Master(talk) 00:06, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Neutral – Rim's inactivity pulls him down here. However, when he does edits, he is usually adding information. I'm really in the middle on this. Ottoman HoldMessage MeMy Action12:38:34March 03, 2016
Neutral – As we've all stated so far (For the most part) Rim's lack of activity greatly pulls Rim down. As Bronkiin said, it would be a bad idea to jump the gun on removing Rim's rights. I say we wait a bit longer yet. The_CrusaderTalkpage01:42:12_March 04, 2016
Oppose[]
Oppose – Been a great member of the Wikia, and I'd like to believe also a friend of mine, but I don't think he's been too active recently. Haven't checked the contributions page, correct me if I'm wrong. Ikabite(talk) 22:18, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose – Rim of the Sky HAS been a great member, but without checking his contribution page I don't know how active he currently is in the forums and editing; I know I haven't ever seen him in chat. I have to oppose him keeping his position. Blutbad(talk) 13:29, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Comments[]
Comment – Blut, the role of Patroller does not require one to come to chat. Basing an argument for removing him as patroller off of the chat room is a little...outrageous... The_CrusaderTalkpage01:42:12_March 04, 2016
Existing patroller. —Atvelonis(talk) 21:48, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Support[]
Neutral[]
Neutral – I sure where i stand here, but at the moment i feel an oppose may be too rash. He was quite active in the main space and in the chat room for a while, but recently his activity has been kinda sporatic. When he does come he will do some maintenance. The Cat Master(talk) 00:06, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose[]
Oppose – Maybe I haven't been around at the right moments, but I haven't seen the level of activity on the Wikia that's required by a patroller from Star. Ikabite(talk) 22:18, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose – Despite many promises to the contrary, there has been almost no increase in activity. He does edit from time to time, but it is only from time to time. Unlike Rim, he never adds content. A great guy who I hope to keep seeing in chat, but isn't doing enough to justify holding onto his rights, and he hasn't been for a while. Bronkiin(talk) 22:26, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose – Sorry Star, but I gotta oppose you on this one. I haven't seen you do much since you got your star, and you haven't remained consistent with the things you have done. I hope that if you do more for your job and put in more effort you'd be Patroller material, but I'm not seeing that much currently. -Kora Stormblade(talk) 23:55, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose – Don't want to be negative here, but Star doesn't really fill the role currently. He edits sometimes, but doesn't really add information. Haven't seen him use his tools much at all. Ottoman HoldMessage MeMy Action12:38:34March 03, 2016
Oppose – In my opinion Star fills the role as chat mod, but I don't think he deserves a position as patroller. Blutbad(talk) 13:31, March 3, 2016 (UTC)
Oppose – Star. The user who taught me how to do simple edits, and basically got me started as an editor here on the wiki. Ah, the long and torturous days that you had where I would sit down and bother you as to how to add a template to the wiki. I truly hate doing this, however, I know it's the logical thing to do. You have been too inactive to keep the role of patroller. I would truly love to be able to sit here and support you keeping your rights, but it just isn't the thing to do. Just, please do continue to hang around. I'm not done with bothering you yet. We still have to discuss playing Arnea. The_CrusaderTalkpage01:42:12_March 04, 2016
Support – Bron has my full support on this. He does his job and he does it exceptionally well, he remains consistent, and he enforces the rules as they need to be. I believe he is a prime example of what a Patroller should be. -
Neutral – as far as I can tell, Cat Master is active at least in the forums and editing; I haven't really seen him around in just chat, but I have to say neutral on this one because I don't really have all that much positive to say, and I have no negative. Sorry, Cat Master.
Comment – I'd like to point out that a patroller's duty is not to chat or forums, but to the main space. That is why the have the roll back tool, so whether he is in chat or not I feel is irrelevant. 
Oppose – Been a great member of the Wikia, and I'd like to believe also a friend of mine, but I don't think he's been too active recently. Haven't checked the contributions page, correct me if I'm wrong.