FANDOM


(Comments)
(Oppose)
Line 58: Line 58:
   
 
{{VoteOppose}} There isn't a sane person who would support EJ. He's incredibely vulgar and manipulative. He also tends to deliberately coerce others into losing faith in their friends. I don't care what anyone says, EJ is a living catastrophe. [[User:789Snowbird987|\m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/]] <sup>([[User talk:789Snowbird987|''Awaken the somneling demon'' ]])
 
{{VoteOppose}} There isn't a sane person who would support EJ. He's incredibely vulgar and manipulative. He also tends to deliberately coerce others into losing faith in their friends. I don't care what anyone says, EJ is a living catastrophe. [[User:789Snowbird987|\m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/]] <sup>([[User talk:789Snowbird987|''Awaken the somneling demon'' ]])
  +
  +
{{VoteOppose}}I agree that EJ might have shown some growth and improvement regarding "being helpful", but is that what Chat Mods are all about? How about we Mod everyone who acts decently in chat? Lemme cut it out for you: it won't work. I'll start by calling out on his edits. 14 edits on main. True, edits are not a requirement anymore, but 14? Also, EJ might be "helpful", but what about his character? Much like Stendarr pointed out, EJ fails miserably in this aspect. I've received a number of complaints from various users I will not name, for respect for them. Not only disagreements, no, but direct offension against them, for the sole purpose of hurting. And those very recently, too, which shows me EJ may have improved as an user, but not as a person. And what does it matter? Chat Mods need to be not only helpful, but nice, knowledgeable and trustworthy. Also, would I trust EJ? My answer is no. I've also had a few complaints because of him either telling things I told him in private, explicitly stating that it was to be kept a secret, or by saying I've done things I actually never have. If it was up to me, EJ would never be a Chat Mod. Now, one might argue my opinions are biased, to which I cannot deny, but I can assure nothing I said here is a lie, and people here know I'm not one for lying. [[User:PLPellegrini|PLPellegrini]] <sup>([[User talk:PLPellegrini|talk]])</sup> 23:32, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
   
 
<span style="font-size:15px;font-weight:bold;">Neutral</span>
 
<span style="font-size:15px;font-weight:bold;">Neutral</span>

Revision as of 23:32, June 10, 2014

Shortcut:
TES:CVOTE
Users must be nominated into their position by an active chat moderator or chat frequent staff member. Nominations for Chat Moderator should be made here, by using the button below.


Casting a vote

Community votes should be cast using one of the following templates with a reason:
{{VoteSupport}} → Voting-support SupportWrite a reason for support
{{VoteOppose}} → Voting-oppose OpposeWrite a reason for opposition
{{VoteNeutral}} → Voting-neutral NeutralWrite a reason for neutrality
{{VoteComment}} → Voting-comment CommentWrite a comment on the topic without voting

Voting generally lasts for 10 days, however, it may be shortened depending on number support/oppose votes.

Chat mod archive 1


EmperorJohnson

EmperorJohnsonTalkContribsEdit count


EJ has been helping around in the chat a lot lately, when things get out of hand he's never to slow to try and put things back in order, he's very helpful and for this I think he deserves to be a mod. Scholy the Wizard (talk) 20:34, June 10, 2014 (UTC)


Support

Voting-support Support – I support EJ. His behaviour improved over the last few months, and espescially the last days proved that he'd do a better job at moderating the chat than some other actual Chat Moderators. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 20:36, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – As nominator Scholy the Wizard (talk) 21:14, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – EJ is helpful to the chat and has acted maturely on many occasions as well as cooling down many arguments. I believe he should be a mod. MoS(Annoy me. Do it.)(Become a Stalker Today!) 20:47, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-support Support – I agree with all the other supporters, EJ has definetly improved and could make a good moderator. I'll give him a chance.DivineTedrius (talk) 21:18, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

Voting-oppose Oppose – I have not actually seen him help in chat. Template:Signature/Pickleseller 20:39, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – EJ has shown multiple times to be hot-headed and aggressive towards people who disagree with him, giving him the ability to ban other users could most likely lead to trouble for the chat. Zippertrain85 (talk) 20:45, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – I have met and spoken with EJ on many occasions, I have known him for almost a full year now, I do not belive him being a Chat Moderator is a good idea Nelthro (talk) 20:53, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – EJ is not Moderator material. He has ended issues, what, twice from what I heard. Yesterday being one. Another being a few months ago.  The reason I oppose him is because before this month, all he would do is shit on people, whether Main Chat or Private Messages. I've personally been attacked by EJ multiple times on Main Chat. Another User, who I will not mention, has been personally attacked by EJ on Main Chat. On PMs, he harrasses me, even when I told him to stop. He's manipulated many friends of mine while doing nothing good. He's matured abit, I will admit, but he has not done anything worthy of the honorary title of Chat Moderator. He's only improved this month. I genuinely feel once he gets the small power of Chat Moderator, he'll stretch it a long ways and become a Corrupted Moderator. The first, if memory serves me right. — KETIK Profile/Talk 21:13, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – He seems to have a habit of swearing. Like, a lot. (Admittedly it can be funny, but it's certainly not necessary) He also is somewhat offensive towards people when he is speaking. No hard feelings, man. Hypomaniac (talk) 21:20, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – Sorry, but I don't think EJ is suitable for the position of chat moderator, while he has shown improvement, multiple times there have been problems involving said user. Anyone is capable of moderating a chat, it's a different situation when it comes to having the correct mindset and having the ability to stay calm in demanding situations. (talk) 21:26, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-oppose Oppose – There isn't a sane person who would support EJ. He's incredibely vulgar and manipulative. He also tends to deliberately coerce others into losing faith in their friends. I don't care what anyone says, EJ is a living catastrophe. \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ (Awaken the somneling demon )

Voting-oppose Oppose – I agree that EJ might have shown some growth and improvement regarding "being helpful", but is that what Chat Mods are all about? How about we Mod everyone who acts decently in chat? Lemme cut it out for you: it won't work. I'll start by calling out on his edits. 14 edits on main. True, edits are not a requirement anymore, but 14? Also, EJ might be "helpful", but what about his character? Much like Stendarr pointed out, EJ fails miserably in this aspect. I've received a number of complaints from various users I will not name, for respect for them. Not only disagreements, no, but direct offension against them, for the sole purpose of hurting. And those very recently, too, which shows me EJ may have improved as an user, but not as a person. And what does it matter? Chat Mods need to be not only helpful, but nice,  knowledgeable and trustworthy. Also, would I trust EJ? My answer is no. I've also had a few complaints because of him either telling things I told him in private, explicitly stating that it was to be kept a secret, or by saying I've done things I actually never have. If it was up to me, EJ would never be a Chat Mod. Now, one might argue my opinions are biased, to which I cannot deny, but I can assure nothing I said here is a lie, and people here know I'm not one for lying. PLPellegrini (talk) 23:32, June 10, 2014 (UTC) 

Neutral Voting-neutral Neutral – I thought about my vote again, and I think EJ isn't fully ready to become a Chat Mod yet. I'd give him 1-2 more months before supporting him. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk)

Comments

Voting-comment Comment – @ Pickle: Really? You were probably not Online yesterday evening when the whole Zipper accident happened. EJ exactly like a Moderator would behave (which Zip didn't, btw) and tried to solve the situation. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 20:41, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – @AES: Even if that did happen, we should not give people moderator status for a one-time incident. The reason we have so many mods who don't do their jobs is because we gave the job too willy-nillily. If, however, he does more things to warrant him becoming a chat mod, I will consider changing my vote. Template:Signature/Pickleseller 20:46, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – Trying to start an argument AES? Not very mod like... Zippertrain85 (talk) 20:55, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – @Pickle, thing is that what happened yesterday wasn't a one-time incident. As I said in my support-post, EJ has been improving over the last few months. He also often tries to enforce the rules if moderators don't. @Zip, I wasn't trying to start an argument. I simply mentioned what happened yesterday. Pelinal Whitestrake (talk) 20:59, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – I don't deserve to be a chat moderator at the moment, as a slow improvement is not the same as what moderators have got. However some of the opposements are downright hypocritical, But I shall not get into this for 'fear' of being called biased. EmperorJohnson (talk) 21:33, June 10, 2014 (UTC)

Voting-comment Comment – Don't we have enough Mods, already? \m/O1s£@u±D£±N£1g£\m/ ( Awaken the somneling demon )

*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.