Reason[]
Why the hell do we have a page for this? —This unsigned comment is by BrooklynGuido42 (talk • contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
- This article only exists for its relevance to the TESWiki project. Read through it, or the pages that link here for a better understanding. Also, please remember to sign talk pages using the proper format. Thanks! --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 18:36, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
Useless[]
I see that the edit summary CCC gave was just a copy/paste of Deyvid's reasoning above. Obviously that means you cannot actually give a reason for the existence of this article. Every single wiki that has been created on Wikia has been done for the exact same reason: specific content on Wikipedia was being removed. This page doesn't actually explain anything new, nor is it even remotely relevant to this wiki. I call again for its removal and would like actual substantive reasoning from those users who actually want this to be kept (and that does not mean quoting reasons given by previous sysops simply because you cannot give a real reason). --Sajuuk 20:06, October 10, 2015 (UTC)
- Why reword the reason when the one Deyvid posted works? You do not get to set terms on our reasoning and your "call" is denied.Cheatcodechamp (talk) 20:53, October 10, 2015 (UTC)
- And neither do you get to decide arbitrarily to disallow discussion on removing this page. As I can see it, you are just opposing anything you don't personally like. You can't even give a real reason why this article should not be removed, except to use other people's reasoning, even going as far as to claim that the reasoning of Deyvid represents the entire community.
- Just because you are a bureaucrat doesn't mean you can just go around dictating how the wiki works: if the community decides to remove this page, then you cannot just arbitrarily decide to ignore the consensus.
- You are not helping the wiki with your arbitrary opposition to every single thing, simply because you don't want to change things. Other sysops aren't so narrow minded as you are being. --Sajuuk 20:56, October 10, 2015 (UTC)
Oh Sajuuk, you act as though it was just you and CCC voting at the moot today :)☽O☾ Bluesonic1 • Message Me •
-- { 10:12, October 18, 2015 (UTC) }
Oops, thanks for pointing that out and sorry for the mistake XD I went by the comment left on the weekly update, and for some reason took edit summary bit as the summary CCC included with his vote in the moot (which was very similar to Dayvid's comment). I'll also make sure I'm wearing my glasses next time :P
☽O☾ Bluesonic1 • Message Me • 
-- { 11:26, October 19, 2015 (UTC) }