I have not engaged in any of those. I merely stated cold hard facts. All I did was stated a positive opinion about those entertainers on Youtube. You were the one who flipped your shit and called my comment a provocative and proceed to claim that my comment was not allowed.
Crossing paths with you multiple times all ends with negativity while I have crossed paths with many others with no negativity in this forum proves that you are the one filled with negativity and you particularly hate me because I don't buy any of your negative b*llsh*t.
"Did you know that you're the only one who lost your inner balance and tries to blame it on others?
You can voice your negative opinion about someone but you have no right to deprive other people's right to voice positive opinion about the same person."
Those are not provocative or insults, you were overthinking things believing that I was out to offend you when all I did was providing a positive balance to your negative imbalance. I am not generous enough to teach you how to achieve true inner balance, I only care for myself, much like everyone else but when you come and harass me because of your own issues, then I will tell you back.
Long story short. Nobody is trying to get you. Stop being over-sensitive.
Busiao No Laughs wrote: Long story short. Nobody is trying to get you. Stop being over-sensitive.
You're actively trying to provoke people by taking their words and changing one or two.
If you want to be helpful, be creative and post your own comment, don't copy-paste others and change a few words.
You're actively trying to provoke people by taking their words and changing one or two.
If you want to be helpful, be creative and post your own comment, don't copy-paste others and change a few words.
No I am not actively trying to provoke anyone. You are just being over-sensitive. I did not copy and paste anything. They are all my sincere opinion. The only difference is my opinion in its core is directly opposite of yours. Even if it is directly opposite of yours it doesn't give you the right to deny my right to voice it. Those two lines I gave have far more consideration behind them which you completely failed to pick out hence all you can see is negativity and assumptions that I am out to provoke you.
I stated "You can believe in anything you want" It includes you. First, Elder Scrolls Lore is in one blg cluster of mess, every lore should be taken with a grain of salt. Take Alduin vs Mehrunes Dagon, I am personally leaning towards Alduin is stronger at full strength but if the companies were to produce new Elder Scrolls contents that proves otherwise, then so be it. Mehrunes is stronger. Plus this line states clearly, I am not putting this line up to argue my opinion is right you must obey my opinion. I left the decision to believe whatever you want to whoever reads it. I have respected everyone's right to have an opinion but your immediate response was to disrespect and attempt to deprive my right to have an opinion.
You can have an opinion, you are free to believe whatever you want. Life goes on and if you want to continue living in negativity, that is none of my business. Do not impose it upon me!
I also stated "Anything Fudgemuppet states has certain viability to it" '
I did not say they are right you are wrong. I merely stated what they said had certain viability which somethings they said were true such as Mehrunes Dagon's Oblivion realm was indeed what they briefly described which everyone with TES IV: Oblivion has can see for themselves. Mehrunes also did managed to bring down the Dragonborn line of Emperors and caused the Empire to be destabilized, What they said about how Alduin was defeated were partially true because in the game, the LDB did work with the Ancient Heroes to defeat Alduin and that LDB didn't absorb Alduin's soul. Those are true hence has viability in them.
Thus anything they states HAS CERTAIN VIABILITY and not absolute viability
I said their Lore is superior. Superior than any lore provided by anyone here because of the sheer amount of effort one needs to put up a lore video. It is a fact that making a Lore Video is more effort and provides visuals to improve the viewers' experience.
Far superior than putting up an essay like this on a forum. Hence everything I said were facts and were never against you. Thus my statement that you were over-reacting is also true.
I wasn't even trying to harass or targeting the dude. I even stated on my first comment that this is just my opinion and left the decision to believe what you want (to have your own opinion) to anyone reading it. That was why I said "You are free to believe what you want"
So which one you think is more powerful? The big fat ugly Daedra or the big fat ugly dragon?
Which fatty you voting? The fat Daedra or fat dragon? Which one you think is more fun?
if this stuff is so essential to the lore and overall story, shouldnt it ALL be in the game and not simply floating around online?
because this "Imperial Library" site is full of bs. this site however, is the true lore of TES
Hey I think I got it
Alduin is a god.
Alduin is an aspect of Akatosh.
Akatosh is an aedra.
Mehrunes Dagon is a Daedra.
Daedra are literally anything but aspects of the gods - they are exact opposites, minus a shit ton of power.
Aedra > Daedra.
Alduin > all Daedra.
Case closed. You cannot argue with algebraic terms.
Alduin is an aspect of Akatosh. wrong Alduin is an aspect of Aka
Deadra are not aspects of the gods-they are gods. Deadra and Aedra are all et'Ada. The difference is that Aedra create Mundus and lose great part of their power while Deadra did not. So Deadra > Aedra
Also Alduin can probably best any Deadra on Mundus but not on Oblivion.
Deadra are not aspects of the gods-they are gods. Deadra and Aedra are all et'Ada. The difference is that Aedra create Mundus and lose great part of their power while Deadra did not. So Deadra > Aedra
Also Alduin can probably best any Deadra on Mundus but not on Oblivion.
The Daedra didn't sacrifice any of their power, thus, they are immortal in their own respective realms. On Nirn, however, Aedra are more powerful than Daedra. The power they "lost" is on the planet itself, hence, their power is everywhere. Nirn is the realm of the divines in the same way that each daedra has their own realm of oblivion.
The Aedra's power over the Daedra is demonstrated a lot of situations. The dragonfires which are bound by the compact between the emperors and Akatosh through the Dragon-God's divinde blood keeps daedric invasions away.
Martin Septim ascending into a mere "aspect" of Akatosh was able to defeat and banish Mehrunes Dagon.
Even things associated with the Aedra can give mortals and advantage over the Daedra.
The amulet of kings granted the Vestige power to defeat Molag Bal in his own realm.
Lorkhan's heart granted divinity to the Tribunal. At the height of their power, not even the most powerful Daedra could challenge them.
Almalexia defeated Mehrunes Dagon singlehandedly during 12 of Sun's Dusk in 2920 in the First Era.
Vivec stopped the moon Baar Dau with a gesture after it was hurled by Sheogorath.
Sotha Sil bound Azura, Boethiah, Hermaeus Mora, Hircine, Malacath, Mehrunes Dagon, Molag Bal, and Sheogorath into a compact that meant they can only be summoned by exceptionally powerful mortals, and not just any amateur summoner. The fact that all 8 of these daedra complied to demands of one "false" god is while they were IN Coldharbour, Molag Bal's realm, meant not even the prince of DOMINATION could dominate a mortal-turned god.
And Azura? What could she do when the Tribunal ascended into divinity? A curse that changed their skin and eyes? That's all?
Daedra are powerful, that's true, and they are within the confines of their realm. But Nirn is Aedric territory, and their power wanes the minute they enter the world. If the Daedra were more powerful than the Aedra, then all of them could easily take over Nirn.
But hey, that's never happened, and the times a few of them attempted to do so were failures.