That is a lie, and you are a confirmed liar. You are absolutely and unequivocably posting YOUR BIASED INTERPRETATIONS of source material. And you are doing so poorly. Your lack of objectivity is offensive and as has been staying, you are a pain to have to slog through, when actually trying to get unbiased information. BeastOfWar (talk) 01:48, March 10, 2017 (UTC) Beast
Also, before I forget, good example of the cretiny smarminess I mentioned.
Also also, keep in mind when you formulate your failed retort, posting assertions of credibility of biased source material is as bad as biasing it yourself. Attempting to claim backup from obviously unobjective source material is technically a little bit worse than just twisting things yourself as you then don't even have the courage to do it on your own. All honest pages on a wiki should be completely non-biased, or failing that, as must happen constantly on this particular wiki; make note of the obvious present bias in source materials. And they should further not be used to explain any honest point, other than how obviously biased they are.