|Have a sweetroll!|
|Atvelonis has awarded you a Sweetroll!|
|Congratulations on earning the Akatosh badge!|
|Have a fishy stick!|
|Rupuzioks has awarded you a Fishy stick! Congratulations!|
Books formatting - QuestEdit
Hi GreyFox, I noticed that you changed formatting at Quest section of Greymoor book articles. On older online articles here, it still looks the same as the edit you fixed. It's more than year since I work on books so if I miss something and this rule has changed I'll be happy for information. I'm planning to edit more Greymoor books, so I'd like to do it correctly. --FrisyN (talk) 14:55, August 10, 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer. Well ok. It's just confusing when articles aren't consistent, even though I compare it with Atv's previous Greymoor articles or corrections.(Which I see as a clue when I'm not sure). I would help, but it's important to know what's correct.--FrisyN (talk) 20:22, August 10, 2020 (UTC)
- Edit war: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page". One revert isn't three. It isn't an edit war just because I reverted a singular edit. I provided an explanation for this singular revert. I don't know why you point out the three reversion rule to me here, since I only reverted once. The other revert was performed by Ottoman Hold, and I don't see a comment on his talkpage about an "edit war".
- If every single revert is instantly considered an "edit war" then why does the "revert" option even exist? I have followed the policies and guidelines in my revert. I've reverted once, and provided an explanation for the revert - we cannot observe the statement of the article in battle. You can even see it in the page history. My last edit before that revert was in october of 2019. By no definition was this an edit war. PuceAardvark made a claim -> Claim lacked sources, so I reverted -> PuceAardvark reverted my revert -> Ottoman reverted PuceAardvark's revert.
- Just because I've broken policy in the past does not mean that every time I revert a bad edit means I must be edit warring. I don't know how you came to that conclusion. Why do you think I didn't revert PuceAardvark's revert of my reversion? Because I was done with the whole "edit war" nonsense, but I guess it follows me anyway. I'm sorry, but the mere accusation that this was edit warring on my part, just because I've been involved in edit wars in the past, is outright ridiculous.
- The definition of edit warring on the wiki is: "If your edit is reverted even once, this is not justification to revert it back; this is called "edit warring", as quoted from our policies. By this definition, I'm not the one edit warring, PuceAardvark is. A singular reversion is not considered edit warring. A reversion of a reversion is. I've already shown you the page history, which shows I never reverted a reversion, I merely reverted a false statement from an edit.
- If you could tell me how my singular revert is considered "edit warring" on my part, I'll gladly accept it. But since both definitions of the rule - both Wikipedia's and TES Fandom's - support my claim that I wasn't edit warring, I'd really like to know why you consider otherwise. I have followed policy in its entirety. You cannot expect me to have the ability to look into the future and know, before it even happened, that Aardvark would revert my reversion of his false statement.
I apologize for causing you to go through so much formatting. Every time I make edits or updates there always seems to be a mistake that needs fixing. I apologize. --Kajune (talk) 04:32, August 28, 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry again for any new mistakes you keep having to fix. I know you said it wasn't a big deal but I really hope in the future I can do proper edits and stop taking up your time with fixes. I'm sorry. --Kajune (talk) 12:04, September 7, 2020 (UTC)
I did an oopsieEdit
I was trying to archive my talk page, and I didnt know how, so I created https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:PuceAardvark/Archive_1?redirect=no and deleted everything on my talk page and moved it to there. But then I saw the option to archive the talk page next to the edit button. And I tried renaming https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:PuceAardvark/Archive_1?redirect=no to "I accendintaly created this" so someone would delete it. and then it created a complete nother user: https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:I_created_this_accendentaly and added all my messages to that talk page. I am so confused right now and idk who to contact since both admins are away. I really dont want to get blocked for switching accounts since I did all this by accident. Can you please delete https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:PuceAardvark/Archive_1?redirect=no and properly archive my talk page?
- Yes I have Discord, but I don't remember my username numbers. I'll login and send them to you tomorrow. I'll also join the TESWiki server.
RE:Spaces and referencesEdit
- Okay. Next time I edit a page, I'll try my best to avoid them. For your sake, if anything. --Kajune (talk) 03:58, September 15, 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I undo that revision over in the Bugs (Arena) page. And sorry for my grumpy & snark outbursts in the edit summaries, my short temper got the better of me, but I’m my more usual calm (though also anxiety) self. Anyway, if a gallery section of screenshots on a bug page is inappropriate and you (or another mod) needs to delete them later, I’ll understand. Clyde BlueSnake (talk) 00:49, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
Re: Animunculi (Skyrim)Edit
I will put back the Background header, didn't even realise I took that off. As for quests, I decided it would be best if that heading be removed completely. Animunculi are technically "creatures" and "enemies". That would mean that if we put quests for animunculi we would need to do the same for bandits, falmer, wolves etc. That would be very unnecessary and very irrelevant since they are all just possible enemies in the quest and don't usually affect the outcome in anyway. Wouldn't you agree? Animunculi is more of a lore article anyway, and should be kept like that.
- I did not actually add the quests header to start with. Thats the reason it was in the Skyrim Pages Missing Data category to begin with. I figured If I removed it then, everyone would get triggered, so I added quests. Now I realize it is largely uneccessary. Anyway, It doesn't matter anymore I guess. Problem Resolved. cept I gotta add that background info now XD.
Does Sheogorath require a Skyrim page? I know I created an Oblivion one, but is a Skyrim one necessary? I ask because I recently found out User:Deyvid Petteys had deleted the Skyrim one several years ago, because "Insufficient coverage to warrant individual article." What are your thoughts? --Kajune (talk) 21:46, September 18, 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll try to create a Skyrim page for Sheogorath. I hope it turns out all right. --Kajune (talk) 00:24, September 19, 2020 (UTC)
RE: Multiple referencesEdit
On the Atvelonis task page, it says "Remove the Category:Morrowind: Enemies from pages, Remove the Category:Online: Enemies from pages, Remove the Category:ESO Morrowind: Enemies from pages." does that mean remove ALL the pages from those categories, or just specific ones?
- I would let the bots do it, but they don't seem to be active at all anymore.