Elder Scrolls
Elder Scrolls

Welcome, High Templar Dominus!

Skyrim Logo Large.png

Hello High Templar Dominus, welcome to The Elder Scrolls Wiki! We're building a collaborative source of information for The Elder Scrolls, and we need your help!

We saw you making some changes to our articles and thank you for it. We hope you choose to further this project, and we hope to see you around in the future. If you choose to stay, here are some links to help you out:

I hope you enjoy editing here! If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask one of our administrators.

--The Cat Master (talk) 10:15, July 19, 2018 (UTC)

Re: About info in Enervating Touch article.[]

Hello, I know it's true because I'm the one who checked and updated all destruction spells. I just double checked again and it's there, though only if you load with Bloodmoon expansion. You should always check with at least Tribunal and Bloodmoon expansions too. --Rupuzioks (talk) 16:53, February 9, 2019 (UTC)

I'm using clean GOG's version of Morrowind (Game of the Year Edition, v.1.6.1820). And I always run both expansion master files (Tribunal and Bloodmoon) when I open CS. I excluded the master files of both expansions and loaded only the main master file into the CS. And this is what I got [1]

Do what you think is right. I'm just writing articles about all Morrowind+Tribunal+Bloodmoon spells for Russian TES Wiki now. I come here (Eng TES Wiki) to find out the original spell names regularly. From time to time I see some inconsistencies (in my opinion of course). But I decided to write only now 'cause today is a day off and I have some free time. I'm also a patroller just like you. Just take a note that when you run the CS without expansions, and with them there may be different information. Perhaps it makes sense to indicate this information in the notes.

Pajeen (talk) 17:53, February 9, 2019 (UTC)Pajeen

Nice job[]

Hey, just wanted to say thanks for all your work correcting and adding links to articles - it's much appreciated :) --Shockstorm (talk) 08:59, September 29, 2019 (UTC)

Hi, you overestimate my humble contribution but thanks anyway :) I appear here rarely 'cause spend alot of time on the Russian TES Wiki. Spent time in the past to be exact. You also add links to articles on the Russian wiki sometimes, I've seen that ;) --High Templar Dominus (talk) 15:06, September 29, 2019 (UTC)

It's still much appreciated though :p especially all the mistakes you corrected, we likely wouldn't have found them --Shockstorm (talk) 02:30, October 1, 2019 (UTC)
Hi can I rename "St. Delyn Waistworks North-One" article to St. Delyn Waist North-One? Proofs here: [2]. --High Templar Dominus (talk) 08:24, October 1, 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, just saw. Like Atv said, you can go ahead (with any pages you know of that need fixing) --Shockstorm (talk) 21:34, October 3, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Page Rename[]

If the correct term is "St. Delyn Waist North-One" in-game and in the CS, rather than "Waistworks," there's no reason not to change it. Just be sure to update the links via Special:WhatLinksHere, and tag the redirect for deletion (via {{Delete}}) when you're done. It would appear that the St. Delyn Waistworks (Morrowind) location is appropriately named, though, so I don't think you need to rename that. We also seem to be missing articles for the southern Waistworks rooms in St. Delyn, if you have a moment to create them. —Atvelonis (talk) 18:59, October 3, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Interwiki link[]

Hello, first you do not need to be so aggressive in the last sentence, we will resolve the issue regardless who is wrong or correct. You linked to the incorrect page, because the correct one is not created yet, there is no need to remove the redirect, you just need to create the page with suffix, for example "The First (Online)". If there is a need to leave the redirect then "The First" page should be made into disambiguation page and the redirect should be renamed with a suffix too. I'll ask about it to members who has more knowledge about the lore. Thanks. --Rupuzioks (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, looks like the redirect is indeed unnecessary, the page is moved and links are fixed. --Rupuzioks (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)