Welcome, Rupuzioks!
Skyrim Logo Large.png
Hello Rupuzioks, welcome to The Elder Scrolls Wiki! We're building a collaborative source of information for The Elder Scrolls, and we need your help!
We saw you making some changes to our articles and thank you for it. We hope you choose to further this project, and we hope to see you around in the future. If you choose to stay, here are some links to help you out:


Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.


I hope you enjoy editing here! If you have any questions, see the help pages or ask one of our administrators.

--Atvelonis (talk) 18:35, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
 Archives.png Archives:
#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8

Perfect formatting[edit source]

Hello again. Look, I can't teaching you how to edit or to patrol edits. But I ask you to leave me alone. If I remove "health" and "power" from LegendsCards infobox — it's because an article about non-creature card — so, it haven't power and health. (Don't know if you played Legends, but you can see this on screenshots.) I checked Formatting guide: there is no rule "empty or unused parameters must be present in source code". Last year you wrote something like "it's for bot maintenance" as edit description. I understood it like "Rupuzioks take care of bots more than humans". But bots don't write articles. Humans do.
I also checked patrollers duties. Revert vandalism? Yes. Keep formatting? No. Man, you have more important things to do. There is 30514 articles included in different "Stub" categories. Exact number may vary, but, anyway: 45 % of wiki articles considered incomplete. It will be better expand them instead of putting back unused parameters, adding dots and commas, links to nowhere, and so on. Yes, pages will be "wrong formatted" then — indeed! They said "non-ideal pages encourage people to edit them". Let someone else to be crazy about formatting. You don't need to keep this sky on your shoulders.
Of course, I can unintentionally make really bad things. Sh*t happens. In this case, it's needed to explain me what I did wrong on my talk page. But you don't need to stalk my edits and fix them, like they were very, very wrong.--Hedera helix (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Let's assume good faith: Rupuzioks don't proving that Hedera helix making bad edits, he just doing his job as Patroller. Uh, wait, what kind of job? Project page says: "Scout Special:NewPages for recently made articles that may not meet our style and formatting guidelines." And you wrote: "…make sure that every article is formatted according this wiki's Style and Formatting". There is a difference between new pages and every article. Don't tell me about "outdated". TBH, I don't care about Moot and other TESWiki stuff — I'm not a part of this community and never will be. (One of reasons is they think I'm lame editor breaking everything I'm touching.) So, if these people make some decisions — it's not my fault policies or other important pages are not updated. And if I remove unused parameters — it's because „…it is easier to change the formatting later…“ part written somewhere in the air instead to be on a page can be linked to.
Keeping assume good faith: don't treat me like a vandal! If you didn't like some changes I'm doing — you had to explain this on my talk page. I can read. A lack of communication can break the best projects apart. And "practicing diplomacy" is listed as Patrollers duty. Not things like this. If link is "already above", why to put this element again? So, let make a deal: you don't 'fix' my edits IMMEDIATELY, even if you don't like them, and I don't believe you are the devil on the Earth. Silent devil.--Hedera helix (talk) 20:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
You didn't visit a link I posted above and was catched. That "blah-blah-blah" paragraph on my talk page not explaining why to add |link= to a file without an actual link. I guess it's because an edit was like "blah" itself. My, my. Why I wrote "I can't teach you" here above? Because your kind of people cannot be taught. You only have your edits and have no open mind to see humans behind them. Anyway. No more pearls before swine.--Hedera helix (talk) 20:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect links[edit source]

Hi! In the article https://elderscrolls.fandom.com/wiki/Custom_Fur_Armor_Price_List there are references to Snow Bear Helm and Snow Wolf Helm in the armor list. However, the articles about these armor items are called Snow Bear Helmet and Snow Wolf Helmet. You need to fix either the link or the title of the article. P.S. Also, please see my message to Atvelonis, because he doesn't reply. SergiuZ (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Editing on about Nerevar and Dunmeri Pantheon[edit source]

Hello Rupuzioks, sorry for editing many times without report it to you. For you see, Indoril Nerevar is a saint, not a god it because he is either Daedra or Tribunal. So far Nerevar himself is a greater saint for his work. Thank you! —This unsigned comment is by Dragonkid1234 (talkcontribs) 06:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.