Following the recent CT, you may be already aware that Zippertrain85 has been removed as a Forum Mod due to his unacceptable language and behavior towards others. However, in the interests of fairness, the comment you made before him ("Grow the fuck up Zipper") was harsh and should not have been made. This rule goes for everyone - from anons to bureaucrats. There are less hostile ways to make your point, and given that you are staff, you should really be setting an example. I'm sure if someone made a personal attack in the chat, you would deal with it.
After discussing this with the other admins, it has been decided that it's only fair to issue you with a formal warning about this comment. Please try to stay calm during these discussions and keep a clear mind. --Jimeee (talk) 10:12, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
Updated with new information
hey, I had an idea for the TES wiki channel, a video where we travel from one end of Tamriel to the other (TESIV + TESV) south to north to show off some of the franchise's awesome features. It sin't uneventful because a lot happens (lol) but I have it recorded and ready to go, 720p, roughly 30 mins long and worth using to get the TES wiki channel back into the uploading business - what d'ya say?
(Also if TES wiki doesn't use it, I will and I want TES wiki to upload again, so maybe I could contribute this way?)
I deleted the archive you requested. Next time, please post a more detailed reason in the deletion template to avoid any possible confusion and hasten deletion. Thank you, however, for posting that in the edit summary line, although it should have been placed in the template. --—Deyvid Petteys (bother \ stalk) 00:12, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
By your own request on chat, I'm actioning an interaction ban between youself and User:Zippertrain85. Both of you are officially prohibited from interacting with each other, in any way, on the wiki in order to avoid future conflict.
After the restriction has been enacted, the next time either person violates the restriction prohibiting any interaction, the violator gets an official warning. After the warning, any further violations by the same editor will result in the editor being blocked. The administrator making a block should determine the appropriate duration based on the circumstances. As long as the other editor does not respond or do anything to violate the restriction, the other editor will receive no warning and won't be blocked.
Prohibited actions under the proposed restrictions would include:
- Making comments about the other editor, indirectly or directly, anywhere on the wiki.
- Making any edit to the other editor's user page, user talk page, or user subpages.
- Undoing any edit made by the other editor.
If either of you absolutely need to contact each other, you can only do so via an admin. All violations must be reported to an admin. If the violation occurs on chat, a screencap must be provided as evidence.
Do I know you?
- But he only needs to make another two pages, then I get 50 points (or something like that).Legoguy451 (talk) 16:47, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I haven't time, I have to go to bed as it's 1 am here, I jsut wanted to finish what I started.. It'll have to wait until tomorrow I'm afraid. —EbonySkyrim Message! 22:57, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
Your recent conduct on various CT's has been completely unacceptable, and will no longer be tolerated. In the Elchzard CT you made two comments that were inciteful, presumptuous and rude. It certainly breaks the Etiquette policy:
- "Do you consider the forum mods to be worthless, in your eyes?"
- "Ghost, Elchzard basically said "If you don't like my opinion, I am removing your rights". Are you condoning that sysops have every right to do this? "
This habit of putting words into people's mouths - when you know fine well that is not what they mean - is unprofessional. As a chat mod, you should know better and its disappointing and frankly embarrassing that I need to remind you of this.
In regards to my reply about sysops, I find it utterly astonishing that you noticed I omitted forum mods and completely focused on that, while ignoring the actual rational I posted. I posted the bulletpoints to give an example, because this is now the third time I have explained this rational. The previous two was in private chat, as you well know. When someone takes the time to explain something, you certainly don't accuse them in such an aggressive manner. Considering all the time I have spent listening and trying to understand your grievances in private chat, this is disappointing. Keep it civil.
This has nothing to you "sugarcoating" your words or "telling it like it is". It's a lack of manners that you believe you are entitled to. You admitted it yourself when you replied to GarouxBloodline with: "I refuse to be nice about things". This is not a one time incident either. This is becoming a pattern. Legitimate criticism is perfectly fine and welcome, provided it is done in a civil manner.
I'll "tell it like it is" without the sugar coating. You already have one warning under your account for conduct related to your behavior. You are a hair's breadth away from a second. This is not how any member of this wiki should behave, be they editor, chat mod, patroller, sysop or indeed forum mod. You are welcome to make constructive criticism - provided you follow the Etiquette policy and assume good faith. Continue to follow you mantra of "I refuse to be nice about things" will only end in one way.